Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains

janbambas.cz

191–200 of 266 posts

Re: Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains

#191
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there any way you can make this work for Chrome on iOS?

I don't think Chrome supports extensions on mobile, but Firefox does, so you could try that if you really want an adblocker.

Firefox does on Android, not on iOS.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/add-ons-firefox-ios

Re: Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains

#192
post #177
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> wipe out data per-request Why would you do that? You are providing a service to the people that is a pure benefit for them and doesn't harm them at all. Why would anyone want to delete such helpful data?

If they don't want a € 10 million fine they have to comply with GDPR, even if no one is going to use it.

AFAIK, GDPR doesn't tell you there need to be an automated way to delete the data. If people can send you a mail with the request and you manually delete it, that's also fine. So if no one will use it, you basically don't have to do anything and be compliant (to this specific GDPR rule).

Re: Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains

#193
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A couple of years ago I went to a conference where one of the speakers outlined his company's web page optimization methods. The big one was to delay executing JS until at least the visible page content was loaded, and all JS that actually implemented customer-useful bits. His example page loaded 94 scripts, which he claimed was representative of many pages.

> His example page loaded 94 scripts, which he claimed was representative of many pages. I know this is the norm, but can we just agree that this is insane ? Some sites I go to, I just see the block badge on UBlock Origin ticking up like a Bitcoin price tracker.

> ticking up like a Bitcoin price tracker

Fitting comparison - we can also expect performance degradation similar to Bitcoin's.

Re: Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The clue here is that even though you’ve been downvoted by multiple people, they’re all too chickenshit to voice their “legitimate” opinion backing the downvote. The only real interpretation here is that, while ethically, you may be correct, you’ve expressed an opinion that “ stealing is wrong ” among members of the thieves guild.

notyourday is insulting the guy based on a supposed lack of "authorization" to speak. That has absolutely zero to do with ethics of the company or the contents of their post.

When pointing out that the king is naked is considered an insult to and by the people clapping about those amazing invisible clothes, one needs to seriously examine if he or she wants to be the person clapping

Re: Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains

#196

I work for an analytics company, this will affect my snippet – I don't think it is a big deal, but I'm going to benchmark it on a few sites. From what is described here, it may actually help us. When folks throw tons of tags into their site, we're all competing against each-other as well as the site's own loading – it makes sense to prioritize the site's rendering. I think of this as no more invasive than pre-caching…

I'm looking forward to the EU regulations kicking in and you having to get consent from everyone ou save data on.

Re: Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains

#197
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

An even better approach is to block all ad-serving domains at the DNS layer. If you associate with my home access point and use my DNS cache, you don't get ads period, and you don't have to install an ad blocker or lift a finger.

Can you explain how you do that?

I loathe ads and tracking. I run ublock origin/https everywhere/privacy badger (the latter of those 2 are from the EFF).

I run a dedicated pfsense machine (old optiplex 755 with an old ssd) I added a nic to it. All network traffic must physically flow through it (1 nic goes to lan 1 goes directly to the cable modem). It's running pfblockerng and DNSBL with a bunch of sources. It's amazing. I can watch youtube videos on my smart tv in the living room streaming with 0 ads.

Re: Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains

#198
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yea, not exactly Pi-Hole, but the same concept. dnsmasq running on router, with a big list of ad-serving domains and hosts resolving to 0.0.0.0

Wow, nice and simple. Is that list available in some repository? would like to implement that since I run a dnsmasq bearing router at my home border as well.

I do the same - my approach was to take some of the popular /etc/hosts files (like http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/zero) and sed them into dnsmasq format:

    # before:  0.0.0.0  evil.biz
    # after:   address=/evil.biz/0.0.0.0
    sed 's#^0\.0\.0\.0[[:space:]]*\([^:]*\)$#address=/\1/0.0.0.0#'
which goes in a file in /etc/dnsmasq.d/, with this line in /etc/dnsmasq.conf:

    conf-dir=/etc/dnsmasq.d
The results can be trimmed a lot, e.g. if you have rules for a.evil.biz and b.evil.biz, you can usually reduce those to a rule for just evil.biz. I wrote some scripts to help with this, which are now at https://petedeas.co.uk/dnsmasq/. I might write something up about the process later.

Re: Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I 100% agree with what you are saying, but in support of GP, I'm sure they were meaning the spirit of net neutrality (don't shape my request), NOT the legal definition of it.

the browsers requests are your requests

But are they? You have no real control on what the browser does when you say GO. Sure you can change browsers, and thats cool, but most consumers don't know who/what/when/where/how to change to another browser.

Its a bit naive, because we technical people can switch willy-nilly from one browser to the next, to assume everyone can.

Re: Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains

#200

I work for an analytics company, this will affect my snippet – I don't think it is a big deal, but I'm going to benchmark it on a few sites. From what is described here, it may actually help us. When folks throw tons of tags into their site, we're all competing against each-other as well as the site's own loading – it makes sense to prioritize the site's rendering. I think of this as no more invasive than pre-caching…

I'm looking forward to the EU regulations kicking in and you having to get consent from everyone ou save data on.

Do you agree for us to save your data?

[Yes] [Read more]

Post reply on HN