Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Schneier is a so-called expert who has testified in front of congress Schneier has been around for a long time, knows the industry well and has made significant contributions. Not everyone get's things right all the time including Schneier. Credibility wise he .. - has a master's degree in computer science - was awarded an honorary Ph.D from the University of Westminster in London - is chief technology officer of B…
I don't want to throw more shade at Schneier than needs to be thrown, but I want to point out that you've pointed out basically two† real credentials: * He has a masters degree. * He wrote a bunch of popular books, and reaped a lot of fame from them. I work, part-time, in the cryptography space his best-known books cover. His most popular book, Applied Cryptography, is not well regarded in the field. Opinions differ…
That‘s nothing to be ashamed of, I‘m sure he didn‘t just do it for the fame, but because he wanted to make things better. I still think he‘s a better cryptographer than writer, but he really seems to enjoy writing.
But it feels uncomfortable when people misunderstand his role.
(And he lost some of my good-will and admiration when he ridiculed Randall Munroe‘s comic and didn‘t have it in him to post a correction for what was basically him not reading the comic, but projecting something he already had in mind. That happens to everyone, it‘s a bit embarassing and not really bad, but sticking to it when he knows full well that the masses trust him is inexcusable.)