Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Schneier is a so-called expert who has testified in front of congress Schneier has been around for a long time, knows the industry well and has made significant contributions. Not everyone get's things right all the time including Schneier. Credibility wise he .. - has a master's degree in computer science - was awarded an honorary Ph.D from the University of Westminster in London - is chief technology officer of B…
But that does not excuse knee-jerk reactions. >China or Russia would be my first guesses Why? If this is just based on it being a massive attack, then there's no basis to automatically blame China/Russia. Have you not noticed this trend? Every time there's a big attack or new strain of malware, it's always China/Russia/North Korea, and that finger pointing is before any concrete evidence? Honestly, it's xenophobic an…
Occam's razor? If the majority of large, coordinated attacks and malware come from those countries it seems reasonable to suspect them initially, doesn't it? He said they were "guesses". He straight up told you he was speculating. That's not xenophobic, that's statistical probability.
> Even if there's a good chance it is them, should we not believe in innocent until proven guilty?
Yes, but if no speculation is allowed until after a conviction then how would anyone ever be investigated? We would never be able to accuse anyone of anything!