Live data from Hacker News

Pineapple Fund: Donating $86M of Bitcoins to Charity

pineapplefund.org

151–160 of 227 posts

Re: Pineapple Fund: Donating $86M of Bitcoins to Charity

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While true, as someone with a number of friends just now "getting into" bitcoin, I find the zero sum aspect of it troubling. Assuming a crash/correction is coming, most of the wealth that accrued to the early adopters will be at the expense of these later, less-informed "investors" who bought in thinking it was a no fail quick buck.

That’s how markets work. Early adopters take risks that pay off when late-comers try to bet on a proven winner.

no, it is not how normal markets work. a stock, bond, real estate "generates income". that's why it has value. bitcoin does not.

Re: Pineapple Fund: Donating $86M of Bitcoins to Charity

#152
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s how markets work. Early adopters take risks that pay off when late-comers try to bet on a proven winner.

no, it is not how normal markets work. a stock, bond, real estate "generates income". that's why it has value. bitcoin does not.

A) Bitoin is not a stock, it's a currency. It'ss value lies in its utility.

B) There are (a lot of) stocks that do not pay dividends and never will. There are a lot of stocks that were issued by companies that never made a profit. Both of those categories are traded with a value above zero, how do you explain that?

Re: Pineapple Fund: Donating $86M of Bitcoins to Charity

#153

It's hard to sell large amounts of bitcoin. Most banks, when they see an incoming wire transfer for $10M marked "bitcoin" will run a mile and close down your account. Hopefully by 'donating' it to these charities, who will probably choose to sell slowly over time or hold it, that alleviates the problem.

I've sold and transferred more than $800K over the course of 3 days. I had no problem. This was from Gemini to a US Bank

Very interested in the bank name.

Re: Pineapple Fund: Donating $86M of Bitcoins to Charity

#154
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

no, it is not how normal markets work. a stock, bond, real estate "generates income". that's why it has value. bitcoin does not.

A) Bitoin is not a stock, it's a currency. It'ss value lies in its utility. B) There are (a lot of) stocks that do not pay dividends and never will. There are a lot of stocks that were issued by companies that never made a profit. Both of those categories are traded with a value above zero, how do you explain that?

Bitcoin has absolutely no utility as a currency. Look at the current mempool [0] to see why.

People then switch to arguing that it's a great store of value. Given its volatility this makes no sense.

[0]: https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#24h

Re: Pineapple Fund: Donating $86M of Bitcoins to Charity

#155
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

no, it is not how normal markets work. a stock, bond, real estate "generates income". that's why it has value. bitcoin does not.

A) Bitoin is not a stock, it's a currency. It'ss value lies in its utility. B) There are (a lot of) stocks that do not pay dividends and never will. There are a lot of stocks that were issued by companies that never made a profit. Both of those categories are traded with a value above zero, how do you explain that?

It doesn't matter if a company isn't making a profit. It still has assets - whether physical, intellectual, goodwill, brand, or anything else. If you own stocks in a company you literally own a part of all of these.

Re: Pineapple Fund: Donating $86M of Bitcoins to Charity

#156
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A) Bitoin is not a stock, it's a currency. It'ss value lies in its utility. B) There are (a lot of) stocks that do not pay dividends and never will. There are a lot of stocks that were issued by companies that never made a profit. Both of those categories are traded with a value above zero, how do you explain that?

It doesn't matter if a company isn't making a profit. It still has assets - whether physical, intellectual, goodwill, brand, or anything else. If you own stocks in a company you literally own a part of all of these.

That would mean that the value of the stock would be decoupled from financial success of the company, which is clearly not the case. A company with very few assets and record profits every quarter will have an expensive stock price.

Re: Pineapple Fund: Donating $86M of Bitcoins to Charity

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A) Bitoin is not a stock, it's a currency. It'ss value lies in its utility. B) There are (a lot of) stocks that do not pay dividends and never will. There are a lot of stocks that were issued by companies that never made a profit. Both of those categories are traded with a value above zero, how do you explain that?

Bitcoin has absolutely no utility as a currency. Look at the current mempool [0] to see why. People then switch to arguing that it's a great store of value. Given its volatility this makes no sense. [0]: https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#24h

To clarify: Bitcoin is deeply flawed, and I agree with you that Bitcoin is probably worth less than many people speculate it is worth (but not zero).

Cryptocurrencies in general have a lot of utility and solve real problems.

Re: Pineapple Fund: Donating $86M of Bitcoins to Charity

#158
post #71

This seems so fake. If its too good to be true...

It's not liquid capital, it's not cash. It potentially has no value, yet giving it away will likely help with the donors' tax situation. Likewise, by giving more people Bitcoin et al, it creates more people with vested interest and who will likely speak positively about Bitcoin et al - which is all to help perpetuate the openly talked about, decentralized and global Ponzi schemes that are taking place.

Pretty misinformed and seemingly bitter, especially for a self proclaimed yogi.

It is liquid capital - and its value is $86mm since you could liquidate this at any moment without moving the order book.

Re: Pineapple Fund: Donating $86M of Bitcoins to Charity

#159
post #3

People spend their entire lives focused on wealth accumulation. Bitcoin has endowed many people with financial means in a way completely orthogonal to their day-to-day work. Say what you will about bubbles, but this "fund manager's" perspective is healthy check on reality.

While true, as someone with a number of friends just now "getting into" bitcoin, I find the zero sum aspect of it troubling. Assuming a crash/correction is coming, most of the wealth that accrued to the early adopters will be at the expense of these later, less-informed "investors" who bought in thinking it was a no fail quick buck.

"no fail quick buck"? If you listen to mass media for the last several years whenever they mention bitcoin they tell you it's an incredibly risky investment.

Re: Pineapple Fund: Donating $86M of Bitcoins to Charity

#160
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The address checks out: https://blockchain.info/address/3P3QsMVK89JBNqZQv5zMAKG8FK3k...

And a NULL transaction to/from that address encoded the string "pineapplefund.org" https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/tx/c44ad5f83ddc84d08967c765...

That transaction cost 20€. Ouch.
Post reply on HN