Portugal’s policy is deeply flawed because it does not legalize the sale of all drugs, only the consumption. When selling is legal is when organized crime leaves the picture, taxes can be collected, product is clean and measured and of quality. Both sides of the equation are important to legalize, doing one without the other means huge problems remain.
Portugal’s radical drug policy is working. Why hasn’t the world copied it?
111–120 of 545 posts
Re: Portugal’s radical drug policy is working. Why hasn’t the world copied it?
#112The nastier side of this elephant in the room is that three letters in general, the CIA in particular, really dislike the fact that congress holds their purse strings, so by creating and then dominating a black market, they can generate money off the books with no congressional oversight for those black projects and whatever other unconstitutional fad of the day is. The CIA learned this all the way back in its OSS da…
Re: Portugal’s radical drug policy is working. Why hasn’t the world copied it?
#113So it’s apparent that many governments around the world are unwilling to take a similar approach to drug use. But could Google, Apple, Facebook et al provide services there? Create functionality to aid in harm reduction and addiction outreach? What would those things really look like, and would those companies actually leverage their access to billions of people to help with drug abuse?
Pls no. Pls, really no. I really dont want any of those companies to even get anywhere near this.
Re: Portugal’s radical drug policy is working. Why hasn’t the world copied it?
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
One things Marijuana legalization has done is decrease opioid usage in states that have legalized it. It has also reduced drunk driving rates. Of course taxes are nice, and removing the money from the underworld is a big win too.
> It has also reduced drunk driving rates. What happened to the overall DUI rates, though?
Re: Portugal’s radical drug policy is working. Why hasn’t the world copied it?
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be fair, the 70% number is true but misleading due to a lot of the new smaller members in the East. More than 80% of EU population is living in a country where either gay marriage or civil unions (which are pretty close) are legal.
edit: the downvotes would be amusing if it weren't because I'm bringing up how regressive most European nations are about gay marriage. I understand it's an inconvenient fact and upsetting to some, I'll go ahead and retain my position however: 70% of European nations not allowing gay marriage, is a travesty. Consider for a moment, that in the responses below, people are actually defending and rationalizing that 70% o…
Re: Portugal’s radical drug policy is working. Why hasn’t the world copied it?
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
Any citation on fewer handguns, fewer deaths? Violent crime actually increased in the UK after they banned guns despite near simultaneous expansion of police funding. These issues aren’t as simple as you might imply. The demographics of Sweden are different than those of Chicago or Matamoros. Conroe, Texas has very high gun ownership and very low violent crime. New York has very low gun ownership and relatively low v…
Here's a study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828709/ > Gun ownership was a significant predictor of firearm homicide rates (incidence rate ratio = 1.009; 95% confidence interval = 1.004, 1.014). This model indicated that for each percentage point increase in gun ownership, the firearm homicide rate increased by 0.9%. Firearms ownership rate doesn't correlate directly to firearms crime rates, but the…
Secondly, this research looks only on guns vs. homicides, I would say that there could be a few other factors that might be more stronger then guns (poverty level, drugs abuse level, local society structure, etc.) - this is speculation, but I don't see that researches even looked on possible other factors that can potentially explain higer/lower homicide rate.
Re: Portugal’s radical drug policy is working. Why hasn’t the world copied it?
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hmm - do you have a cite on your claims about the UK? It's hardly fair to ask for citations when you give none.
edit: I'd like to see the people downvoting my facts , counter how this doesn't amount to a wave or big surge of crime, these numbers are huge increases in a short amount of time. --- Crime has seen a huge increase in Britain and it appears set to keep getting worse. Crime in London has increased dramatically. I'm not going to claim that's due to gun laws, however it is factually correct that crime is surging big tim…
I agree both that you're factually correct and that your data does not at all support your earlier assertion that "banning guns increased gun crime".
So % are increasing, but the overall per-capita UK gun crime and death is still woefully below the good ol US of A as per: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/06/16/gun-vio...
Re: Portugal’s radical drug policy is working. Why hasn’t the world copied it?
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
edit: the downvotes would be amusing if it weren't because I'm bringing up how regressive most European nations are about gay marriage. I understand it's an inconvenient fact and upsetting to some, I'll go ahead and retain my position however: 70% of European nations not allowing gay marriage, is a travesty. Consider for a moment, that in the responses below, people are actually defending and rationalizing that 70% o…
If you're doing the census of an appartment block, do you count the flats or the people in each? Same difference here.
> If you're doing the census of an appartment block, do you count the flats or the people in each?
If I were doing a census of an apartment block, I would count the number of flats and the people in each. For conceptually the same reason it's a good idea to know how many households there are in a nation as well as how many people total.
Re: Portugal’s radical drug policy is working. Why hasn’t the world copied it?
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be fair, the 70% number is true but misleading due to a lot of the new smaller members in the East. More than 80% of EU population is living in a country where either gay marriage or civil unions (which are pretty close) are legal.
edit: the downvotes would be amusing if it weren't because I'm bringing up how regressive most European nations are about gay marriage. I understand it's an inconvenient fact and upsetting to some, I'll go ahead and retain my position however: 70% of European nations not allowing gay marriage, is a travesty. Consider for a moment, that in the responses below, people are actually defending and rationalizing that 70% o…
It’s possible for something to be both true and misleading - the 70% figure makes the situation sound worse than it really is, IMO.
Re: Portugal’s radical drug policy is working. Why hasn’t the world copied it?
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
edit: the downvotes would be amusing if it weren't because I'm bringing up how regressive most European nations are about gay marriage. I understand it's an inconvenient fact and upsetting to some, I'll go ahead and retain my position however: 70% of European nations not allowing gay marriage, is a travesty. Consider for a moment, that in the responses below, people are actually defending and rationalizing that 70% o…
It's not misleading in the least It’s possible for something to be both true and misleading - the 70% figure makes the situation sound worse than it really is, IMO.
The situation is bad, IMO, when the majority of European nations don't allow gay marriage. It's a grotesque travesty.