Live data from Hacker News

Using Artificial Intelligence to Augment Human Intelligence

distill.pub

31–33 of 33 posts

Re: Using Artificial Intelligence to Augment Human Intelligence

#31
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honest intellectual sparring over art comes in the form of art. Saying "I could have made that" is false in the context of art. If a person could have they would have. If they didn't, they can't. The proof is in the work.

That's ridiculous. Every artist has to make choices -- they can't pursue every avenue of creative development. Not everyone brings all their potentials to fruition. Opportunity costs. To say "unless you have already done x, you cannot do x" is a mind-bogglingly wrong perspective to take. Many people are capable of coming up with, for example, witty, plausible conceptual art ideas. Generally they don't pursue it becau…

An art idea, however witty is not a work of art. The hard part of art creation is the willingness to evaluate opportunity costs in terms of lost opportunities to make art. Saying "This sunset would make a lovely photograph" is not making a photograph of a sunset. Art is in the artifact.

The professional artists I know aren't famous. They don't persuade people. Sometimes they do what they do. Sometimes they make things they think people will like. Sometimes they make works on commission. They make a living at art, but it is something they were doing before making a living at art and had ordinary day jobs. As professionals artists their day job looks a lot like other day jobs in that they work a lot of hours and have to deal with paperwork and order supplies and collect money from customers.

Re: Using Artificial Intelligence to Augment Human Intelligence

#32
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's ridiculous. Every artist has to make choices -- they can't pursue every avenue of creative development. Not everyone brings all their potentials to fruition. Opportunity costs. To say "unless you have already done x, you cannot do x" is a mind-bogglingly wrong perspective to take. Many people are capable of coming up with, for example, witty, plausible conceptual art ideas. Generally they don't pursue it becau…

An art idea, however witty is not a work of art. The hard part of art creation is the willingness to evaluate opportunity costs in terms of lost opportunities to make art. Saying "This sunset would make a lovely photograph" is not making a photograph of a sunset. Art is in the artifact. The professional artists I know aren't famous. They don't persuade people. Sometimes they do what they do. Sometimes they make thing…

Since the 1960s, conceptual art has been an uncontroversial thing. An idea _can_ be art. A gesture that leaves no perceptible trace can be art. "A great artist can make art by simply casting a glance." – Robert Smithson.

The reality of the trendy art world (high-profile artists and gallery) is that good PR is the one thing an artist absolutely can't do without. Everything else is optional. Anything can be art. No physical manifestation is required.

I'm sure the artists you mention are serious and professional. There's a distinction that's sometimes drawn between the kind of conceptual/trendy work and supposedly more honest, commercial or traditional art production. It's almost always the more conservative, conventional people who make that distinction -- it's a way of dismissing more conceptual work as pretentious or elitist.

Re: Using Artificial Intelligence to Augment Human Intelligence

#33
post #23
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dude. You can't be serious about bastardizing stunningly detailed 9th Wave by Aivazovsky and calling it "Process for turning classic paintings into beautiful color muses." That's like making a confetti from the Mona Lisa with a hole puncher. https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2000/1*sph_3TactpBHo_mZ-... Original for reference - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/Hovhanne...

This is an uncivil, low-effort dismissal. Hacker News doesn't need any of those, so could you please not post them? https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Kindly elaborate how this is uncivil.

I genuinely don't understand how can anyone consider passing a masterpiece through a blur filter and then calling it a "process" or a "work".

Post reply on HN