Earlier quoted context omitted.
until the miners are convinced otherwise bit like the central banks
not at all like central banks because mining is decentralized. Besides, there are also users and merchants who are just as important and miners don’t dare pushing changes that nobody wants.
Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf]
221–230 of 243 posts
Re: Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf]
#222I'm so lost, there are so many conversations here talking about IPFS compared to things like Dropbox and S3. Why? To me, IPFS aims to solve a completely different problem. IPFS does not exist because we don't have means to host and distribute files - that is a problem solved by a hundred different entities. IPFS, as advertised in many mediums (video/etc), is a platform to distribute data from a local-first P2P medium…
Re: Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf]
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bikeshedding this some more because HN is for bikeshedding... I am toying around with the wacky heresy that Karl Marx (not Lenin) was right. Capitalism will evolve into socialism. It would be a form of socialism we haven't seen yet and that would have been technologically impossible in the past. Capitalism's role is to develop the technology, wealth, and infrastructure to enable it... as Marx said. Tech titans, start…
I'm trying to see how small numbers of bourgeois nerds running energy intensive get-rich-quick schemes - often with the help of billionaire backers - resembles the Marxian concept of the proleteriat fighting to gain the full benefit of their day's labour and struggling tbh...
Socialism is inconceivable without large-scale capitalist engineering based on the latest discoveries of modern science. [...]
Only those are worthy of the name of Communists who understand that it is impossible to create or introduce socialism without learning from the organisers of the trusts. For socialism is not a figment of the imagination, but the assimilation and application by the proletarian vanguard, which has seized power, of what has been created by the trusts. We, the party of the proletariat, have no other way of acquiring the ability to organise large-scale production on trust lines, as trusts are organised, except by acquiring it from first-class capitalist experts.
We have nothing to teach them, unless we undertake the childish task of “teaching” the bourgeois intelligentsia socialism. We must not teach them, but expropriate them (as is being done in Russia “determinedly” enough), put a stop to their sabotage, subordinate them as a section or group to Soviet power. We, on the other hand, if we are not Communists of infantile age and infantile understanding, must learn from them, and there is something to learn, for the party of the proletariat and its vanguard have no experience of independent work in organising giant enterprises which serve the needs of scores of millions of people.
Re: Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf]
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
As an economist, I am much more comfortable with that statement It is somewhat a worse situation than you describe, as though bitcoin is legal tender nowhere, it is assuming many of the features of a component of broad money supply (somewhere in the neighbourhood of M3 or thereabouts, so it can self-perpetuate for a long time indeed). Also, as a consequence of its construction and finite supply of bitcoins, it does n…
Hi Qubex, I appreciate your thinking here. I’m fascinated by the topics of economics and currency controls here and would would love to discuss some of these issues with you (relevant to a current project). Can we email? My contact is in my bio.
I wish to remark however that mine is a purely doctrinarian point of view, argued from first principles, and that bitcoin is by no means my field of expertise. I'm just looking at is as any neoliberal/monetarist financial economist (with a passion for market failures and the study of disequilibria) would.
To coin an analogy (pardon the pun): I'm like a chemist telling people about how dangerous plutonium is, purely on the basis of its chemical reactivity and toxicity, blissfully ignorant of its transcendent physical reactivity and fissile potential.
Within the window of that proviso, and assuming I have more to say on the topic (it might surprise you, but I'm not terribly interested in bitcoin, and don't bother to stay up to date on it beyond the occasional sensationalistic news that filters through Bloomberg and international media), I'm always eager to have a rational, measured conversation even between people that disagree. I'm not a bitcoin guru, I'm not an active equities, commodities, or derivatives analyst or investor, and I concern myself with the comparatively mundane task of running a family business that has blossomed into a multinational corporation. Despite what my written English may belay I'm not even an Anglo-Saxon, so I couldn’t declare myself to be entirely up-to-date on the nuances of political debates occurring in America in particular either, and I will of course exhibit an unknown Continental, centrist, statist bias.
Re: Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf]
#225> a total of $257 million – so far the biggest initial coin offering (ICO) as of today (September 2017).
This appears incorrect, as the Sales Summary on https://eosscan.io/ shows EOS having raised over $400 million by September (first 68 days).
Re: Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf]
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're comparing Bitcoin to diamond, but there are many more asset classes that are actually more similar to Bitcoin, which actually work. I think a lot of people make the mistake of using pattern matching to judge Bitcoin when they don't have enough patterns to work with. There are and were many financial products that could have worked (but failed because of corruption) or are working currently that most people who…
Why does it matter that there's no single centralized group who does the marketing and controls scarcity? Bitcoin's entire selling point is that those kinds of things can happen without centralization!
You want to know what is scary? Two weeks ago my sister's former boyfriend, a private soldier that left school at sixteen, started gushing enthusiastically about bitcoin and about how he had made fifty euro on his investment over the past three weeks. I started to feel sick in the pit of my stomach and I thought of how Henry Ford called his broker and instructed him to “sell everything” when his doorman or elevator-operator (anecdotes differ in detail) started telling him about stocks in 1929.
Folks, sell everything.
EDIT: Oh heh today bitcoin crashed, again. How amusing.
Re: Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf]
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
not at all like central banks because mining is decentralized. Besides, there are also users and merchants who are just as important and miners don’t dare pushing changes that nobody wants.
Do you realize that of miners decided to fork in favor of a model which is better fit them, there will be a shortage of block mining until the difficulty declines. Which means transactions would be frozen for around a month. I'm not sure users and merchands could stand that fight …
Rational miners realize that forcing a protocol change that isn’t acceptable to users or merchants will destroy valuation of the fork they choose to mine, so there is discebtive from such behavior.
But yes, if they do it anyway, there will be period with very slow blocks and that will hurt the project a lot but then difficulty will adjust downward.
Re: Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf]
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
As an economist, I am much more comfortable with that statement It is somewhat a worse situation than you describe, as though bitcoin is legal tender nowhere, it is assuming many of the features of a component of broad money supply (somewhere in the neighbourhood of M3 or thereabouts, so it can self-perpetuate for a long time indeed). Also, as a consequence of its construction and finite supply of bitcoins, it does n…
Just a few days ago the thought came to me that a government mandated crypto-currency in Canada might be well-named as the Loonie. Also, I am wondering how hard it would be to create a model - interactive online - that has different models of comparing a Ponzi scheme scale operation vs. a Bitcoin-like operation.. Is there software or online platforms for economists to run these kinds of analysis?
Re: Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf]
#229Earlier quoted context omitted.
Filecoin is trying to solve (paying for) file hosting through IPFS. Many of the existing projects around IPFS are "host X, but on IPFS".
No, it's more generally about hosting any content-addressed data. That's much much more than files/directories, as S3/Dropbox/Sia are doing. Files and directories are just one particular data structure you can store on IPFS. Think of it as a global unified content-addressed graph database really, and Filecoin can store any arbitrary (sub)graphs within that.
Back to my original points, I don't think it is about hosting the data. It's the location of the data. Eg, a room full of people downloading a large video don't need to leave the room for the majority of the data, they can share the data between each other - seamlessly. Leading to less clogging of the network of data when there's absolutely no need for us to be downloading from youtube/etc.
For me personally, another thing IPFS does is allow access to immutable data. Seeing as websites love to change data on the fly, it's hard to know what someone else saw, compared to what you saw. Was the article modified? Did X political candidate change what s/he's saying on their site? IPFS solves this, and this is my favorite part, tbh.
Re: Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf]
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
So what is your opinion on Ethereum, given the knowledge that one of its co-founders was awarded a Thiel Fellowship?
There wasn't any Ethereum ICO. Every ETH was mined.