The title says "San Francisco" but the article only mentions "Mountain View, Cupertino or Palo Alto" ... ??? What kind of comparison is this?
Choosing New York over San Francisco
81–90 of 122 posts
Re: Choosing New York over San Francisco
#82Not every time, but much of the time, I try to talk about what I do with a New Yorker (most East Coasters, actually), they start by bringing a lot of stop energy[0]. They'll say something like "Why are you doing that when there's already X?"[1], "That'll never work because of Y"[2], "Why did you quit your job at Z?", "Why don't you go work at ABC Investments, Hedge Funds, and Worldwide Arbitrage, Inc?"[3], etc. It's…
I'm not sure a little stop energy is such a bad thing. I'd say take their views with some salt...but Silicon Valley tends to be an echo-chamber. What's important in the valley isn't always important everywhere else. Unless your business/venture/idea is only targeted at people in the Bay Area, it pays to keep a little attention elsewhere.
Re: Choosing New York over San Francisco
#83Is san francisco ruby or python?
I don't know, but Boston is C++. Its mixture of hacker culture, hyper-IQ academia, and classical puritan social values is sort of like implementing closures with template metaprogramming and special #ifdefs everywhere for compiler backward compatibility. It's puritan social values plus academic liberalism plus nerds. It is backward compatible but not strictly a superset. Comparing cities to programming languages thre…
Re: Choosing New York over San Francisco
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know, but Boston is C++. Its mixture of hacker culture, hyper-IQ academia, and classical puritan social values is sort of like implementing closures with template metaprogramming and special #ifdefs everywhere for compiler backward compatibility. It's puritan social values plus academic liberalism plus nerds. It is backward compatible but not strictly a superset. Comparing cities to programming languages thre…
Do you think Boston is the best city for nerds? I'm looking for a genuinely pro-intellectual climate.
If you like the quiet life, lots of academic options, and very tame social gatherings then Boston is for you. If you like excitement, extraverted social culture, and lots of new experiences then I'd look at SF.
Boston has some plusses: it's a walking city... possibly the only true walking city in the country (of any size). You do not need a car. It's ridiculously safe for a big urban area. Bostonians' idea of a bad neighborhood is one without a Starbucks in eye-shot. It's very economically healthy and has a lot of good high paying techie jobs.
But some of that could be said about SF too... just not the walking city part. (Well, SF proper can be handled without a car, but all the techie stuff is in the valley which is a car-centric suburb.)
Both are among the nicest cities in the country.
Re: Choosing New York over San Francisco
#85Not every time, but much of the time, I try to talk about what I do with a New Yorker (most East Coasters, actually), they start by bringing a lot of stop energy[0]. They'll say something like "Why are you doing that when there's already X?"[1], "That'll never work because of Y"[2], "Why did you quit your job at Z?", "Why don't you go work at ABC Investments, Hedge Funds, and Worldwide Arbitrage, Inc?"[3], etc. It's…
Re: Choosing New York over San Francisco
#86Not every time, but much of the time, I try to talk about what I do with a New Yorker (most East Coasters, actually), they start by bringing a lot of stop energy[0]. They'll say something like "Why are you doing that when there's already X?"[1], "That'll never work because of Y"[2], "Why did you quit your job at Z?", "Why don't you go work at ABC Investments, Hedge Funds, and Worldwide Arbitrage, Inc?"[3], etc. It's…
You should have good responses to questions loaded with "stop energy" anyways.
Re: Choosing New York over San Francisco
#87 San Francisco is fun, don’t get me wrong. Compared to New York,
it’s boring. I have trouble even thinking about living in an
apartment in Mountain View, Cupertino or Palo Alto. Those places
are socially dead.
Mountain View, Cupertino or Palo Alto are not San Francisco. It is like saying... New York City is fun, don’t get me wrong. Compared to San Francisco,
it’s boring. I have trouble even thinking about living in an apartment
in Staten ISland, East Rockaway or Westchester. Those places
are socially dead.Re: Choosing New York over San Francisco
#88I think one major argument that he didn't mention is that NYC beats SF hands down in the 'getting laid' department. If you are young and your idea of having a good time is going out, partying until 4am, and getting laid often, then you should stay in NYC. If you a super hipster, social outcast and/or into weird stuff, then come to SF. Your friends are already here.
I'm from the east coast too. Been there, done that.
Re: Choosing New York over San Francisco
#89Another common gripe about California that I'll echo here: there's no weather! It may sound masochistic but I miss the seasons, the snow, wearing a scarf, sheltering inside with a cold nose and hands with something warm. The passing of the seasons gives life a constant pulse and direction. The eternal summers of CA get to be disorienting after a while.
San Francisco is fine You sure get lots of sun But I'm used to four seasons California's got but one http://www.allthelyrics.com/lyrics/bob_dylan/california-lyri... Which shows how little time he actually spent in SF, of course. Mark Twain's famous line about the coldest winter he ever spent being a summer in San Francisco is a lot closer to the truth. Unfortunately, Twain never actually said that. The internet, dest…