Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sweden, but on closer inspection it seems I was mistaken. There are, however, very strict rules: • No junk mail addressed to anyone under 16 years of age. • No TV advertisements directed towards, or meant to catch the attention of, anyone under 12 years of age. Additionally, in TV shows aimed at children below 12, there can be: 1. No commercials preceding or following the program, nor any commercial breaks in the pro…
How about sugary foods in the supermarket, advertised with e.g. superheroes or idols on the packaging?
YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeting children
151–160 of 461 posts
Re: YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeting children
#152Also, in case you glazed over the link to the recent Medium article, here it is: https://medium.com/@jamesbridle/something-is-wrong-on-the-in... I read it last night after the wife recommended it ... and wow.
Re: YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeting children
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah. She's only allowed on Netflix now. I've seen Sofia 10,000 times.
I never understood how it was possible for little girls to watch the same movie literally hundreds of times, sometimes twice in one day. Some day science will get around to the real mysteries like this. I think I've tried to erase the memories of torture I survived, hearing Horton Hears a Who played most days for almost a year.
Re: YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeting children
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
"I cannot be bothered to look after my offspring therefore I will downvote whomever doubts that education-by-internet for two year olds is appropiate"
I don't remember seeing "whomever" before, so I hope you don't mind me trying to understand where it is used. I see that it is used for the object of a verb, and whoever for the subject of a verb, but I am a bit confused here, because here it is the object of "downvote", but the subject of "doubts", so I am confused. In the sentence "I will look at whomever Bob greets.", I think I understand why it is "whomever", and…
Re: YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeting children
#155I was exposed to tons of super-weird stuff on TV an the internet (adult swim, fat-pie, etc) and so were most of my friends growing up. I don't think it was problematic for any of us.
When you're a kid and something feels disturbing, you turn it off. Our society really doesn't give kids any credit for being autonomous and resilient.
Most of all, I don't like that one corporation has the power to "crack down" on a whim about what's appropriate for kids to watch on a global scale.
Re: YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeting children
#156This could have been an ideal add-on to the YouTube Red brand. I hope instead their reputation takes a hit from this oversight.
Re: YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeting children
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
RIGHT. People complaining about these bizarre violent videos but they'll sit their kids in front of mind control all day.
Don't know why you got downvoted, have an upvote
I think it's more of a "why did bots and inattentive parents fuck it up for the rest of us."
Re: YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeting children
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
How on earth can parents willingly expose their children to any kind of advertisement is beyond me. Adblocking is a must. Especially at such young age, you should know and control all manipulative media your kid consumes.
You mean like TV ads, billboards, bumper stickers, magazines, newspapers, NPR sponsors, ....
Re: YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeting children
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
RIGHT. People complaining about these bizarre violent videos but they'll sit their kids in front of mind control all day.
Don't know why you got downvoted, have an upvote
Re: YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeting children
#160It's (un)surprising how fast YouTube responds to this somewhat mild criticism, while holding steady on their radio silence regarding the large amounts of huge creators who are getting demonetized and community strikes against their accounts. Nearly every big channel I watch has posted a video complaining about it in the past 2 months, with many just this week. Gives you some good insight on where their priorities are…
Based on who the complainers I’ve seen are, I’m sure that at the very least youtube threw out some baby with bathwater. But that said, their monetisation has not been successful. They do need to make big, hard changes. A lot of what monetisation did was encourage spam, or content quality just above the spam threshold. Meanwhile, patreon (though obviously which a much smaller footprint) seems to encourage the kind of…