On the topic of having nothing to hide, the following description of how 'privacy' differs from 'secrecy' really opened my eyes to the importance of the whole privacy issue and why not having anything to hide isn't an excuse to give up your right to privacy: What you do in the bathroom is not a secret, but you still want to close the door—you still want your privacy. Everyone knows what happens in the bathroom, but e…
But someone might not be doing what everyone thinks they're doing in there.
Nothing to Hide – a documentary about surveillance and you [video]
21–30 of 47 posts
Re: Nothing to Hide – a documentary about surveillance and you [video]
#22We all have stuff to hide, but shouldn't we agree that we shouldn't?
Re: Nothing to Hide – a documentary about surveillance and you [video]
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
But we don't have glass doors in bathrooms because of that
Tons of mens restrooms don't have doors or walls around shitters specifically so no one fucks or does drugs in them.
Re: Nothing to Hide – a documentary about surveillance and you [video]
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
But someone might not be doing what everyone thinks they're doing in there.
The same could be said for what you do in your own home with all the curtains pulled.
Re: Nothing to Hide – a documentary about surveillance and you [video]
#25We all have stuff to hide, but shouldn't we agree that we shouldn't?
The powerful ought to be have no privacy, because with power there's the need for public oversight. Ditto for corporations, government, and so on. And conversely, the weak ought to have total privacy, because they're so vulnerable. In reality, we have pretty much the opposite. Because wealth and power protect themselves. So it goes.
Still, the idea that the weak should have more privacy sounds about right.
Re: Nothing to Hide – a documentary about surveillance and you [video]
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
The powerful ought to be have no privacy, because with power there's the need for public oversight. Ditto for corporations, government, and so on. And conversely, the weak ought to have total privacy, because they're so vulnerable. In reality, we have pretty much the opposite. Because wealth and power protect themselves. So it goes.
Perhaps the powerful should have less professional privacy. But personal privacy is not far from dignity for many. So let's not make their personal lives any more of an industry than it already is. Still, the idea that the weak should have more privacy sounds about right.
Re: Nothing to Hide – a documentary about surveillance and you [video]
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's why we should get rid of SSNs, credit card numbers, passwords, etc.
You're missing the point. Receipts, work-related files, birth certificates, passports. There will always be information we have to safeguard. It's not feasible to switch all authentication from what-you-know (passwords) and what-you-have (certificates) to what-you-are (biometrics), which is the only way I can see us getting rid of SSNs, passwords, and credit card numbers.
Re: Nothing to Hide – a documentary about surveillance and you [video]
#28We all have stuff to hide, but shouldn't we agree that we shouldn't?
If the universe had somehow formed to create humans who shared a single consciousness, sure that would work. But as long as we are individuals, we need the space to have a self .
Re: Nothing to Hide – a documentary about surveillance and you [video]
#29We all have stuff to hide, but shouldn't we agree that we shouldn't?
The things worth hiding might not be the same things in 20 years. It's not illegal to be a Jew right now but look back a few years and see what could happen when there are registers of peoples beliefs.