Try quickly typing 1+ 2 + 3 into the iOS 11 Calculator
201–210 of 501 posts
Re: Try quickly typing 1+ 2 + 3 into the iOS 11 Calculator
#202Almost all of the animations on iOS are about 2x-3x as long as they should be. First off, they look terrible, the slooooooow change from one thing to another. Secondly, they severely impede usability because you have to wait wait wait for 1000ms here, 1000ms there, and another 1000ms there after every action. It's enough to make me want to give up privacy and switch to Android. Soooo pissed at slow animations. 500ms,…
Re: Try quickly typing 1+ 2 + 3 into the iOS 11 Calculator
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Conveniently, this should be a trivial fix trivial to fix the bug in the calculator app. not trivial to deploy that fix. this would be a full system update, right?
Yeah, it'd have to be a proper OS update, because it's one of the core apps. But, also conveniently, iOS 11.1 is in beta at the moment. They just released beta 5 today, so it's not like they couldn't slip a fix for this in before the final release if they wanted to. Whether they will or not, well...
Re: Try quickly typing 1+ 2 + 3 into the iOS 11 Calculator
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
It definitely looks more sort of futuristic, I have to concede that. Too bad we have to actually use these devices instead of just admiring them in the shop. Thank you for advocating mechanical buttons.
In the 70s my family bought a microwave oven. It had one knob with a dial, which you would turn clockwise to the number of minutes. The microwave would immediately start (if closed, of course) and count down. The gradations had a logarithmic scale. If you wanted to stop early, you turned the knob counterclockwise to zero. That interface was genius. These days I sob and cry every time I have to figure out how to use a…
Re: Try quickly typing 1+ 2 + 3 into the iOS 11 Calculator
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
Another example, which has existed for as long as I have known, is the spinning number selectors on iOS, used in apps such as Clock for setting alarms or selecting times/dates. The new value doesn't register until the animation completes, so if I set my alarm too fast, it doesn't save: Let's say the alarm is set to 09:00 and I change it to 09:30. So I spin the minute field up to 30 and hit Save. If I do it too quickl…
I find the spinner interface is a bit clunky in the first place as well. I haven't found anything as fast to use as the N9-style circle[1]. [1] http://www.nition.co/2014/08/the-nokia-n9-alarm-clock
A screenshot at the beginning of https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37809848/can-we-use-some...
However IMHO it's a big usability regression from the old time picker widget, which was a number pad to enter the four digits a time is made of. I know the time I want to set and instead of typing it straight away I have to look for numbers on a dial. It takes longer.
Design teams are losing their way. Too much eye candy is making them blind to efficiency, pun intended.
Re: Try quickly typing 1+ 2 + 3 into the iOS 11 Calculator
#206As soon as I upgraded my 6s to 11, I saw performance seriously degrade. It takes -seconds- to bring up the iMessage editor. My immediate thought was that Apple had liberally sprinkled wait() into the iOS 11 code base so that I'd feel like my ole A9 CPU just wasn't cutting it any more and I'd realize, as they do, it's time to upgrade. Or... maybe they are running every key stroke through the new Azure-enabled Cray com…
My iPhone 7 - the latest iPhone at the time iOS 11 came out, and with the fastest single threaded mobile CPU for some time - can no longer play locally downloaded audio and be used at the same time without stuttering constantly. Everything is broken on iOS 11. Extremely frustrating. I will buy a new phone, but not an iPhone.
Re: Try quickly typing 1+ 2 + 3 into the iOS 11 Calculator
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
Capacitive buttons are a plague, man. Even the cheap new stoves have them now. Monitors and TVs have had them for a while. Cars are going for touch displays. There's a delay, they don't work every time, and you can't feel them out. Are they cheaper? I don't understand the point of them in the cases where they're literally just replacing a real button. The worst is when they don't even indicate clearly where the butto…
They certainly must be cheaper - no mechanical components, just a single wire (instead of two) connecting the pad to the micro-controller. And they are "fancy"/"futuristic". My lab placed fancy touch-screens in the place of the light switches. Now turning the lights on or off takes at least 15 seconds but we get to pretend to be luxurious :(
Re: Try quickly typing 1+ 2 + 3 into the iOS 11 Calculator
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is revisionist drivel. Every year it's always "Apple is dying" as they continue to siphon money from every industry they touch. They are about to push a tonne of users into a higher price point with the iPhone X. The Apple Watch is an unquestionable success. We are on the precipice of seeing an ARM based MacBook based on their incredible work with A-series chips. They are also strategically very well placed with…
Do we even have sales figures for the apple watch. All I see is made up numbers and guesses.
Not that I spend any time looking at people's wrists, but you'd think if it was a massive success everyone would notice.
Re: Try quickly typing 1+ 2 + 3 into the iOS 11 Calculator
#209Reduce Motion helps a bit, but honestly I’d disable all animations that aren’t absolutely non-blocking.
Re: Try quickly typing 1+ 2 + 3 into the iOS 11 Calculator
#210People are talking about "lag" and performance, as if this was a "the system can't handle it!" issue. This is a misleading description. The actual issue is that some developer at Apple screwed up their animation configuration when implementing the calculator redesign, and nobody tested adding more than two numbers together quickly. Multiple failures, none involving system performance. What's happening is: the operato…