Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

hacks.mozilla.org

161–170 of 190 posts

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#161

Tab Mix Plus, DownloadThemAll, RightToClick, Status-4-Evar... all regularly used by me, none migrated yet. Not to mention the loss of Classic Theme Restorer's control over the UI highly disappoints me. I really really dislike being locked into the "Chrome Style" UI. I've disliked it since Chrome was released.

Read the news for DownloadThemAll: http://www.downthemall.net/

It's coming. He has started. You can help by becoming a patron.

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#162
post #57
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The good of the many outweighs the good of the few.

IMO Gutting your developer base is seldom good.

What developer base? 99% of new addons are Chrome first/only (like uBlock, uMatrix). And most of the legacy addons were abandoned long ago.

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would like to switch to Bitwarden, but I don't know how I can assure I can trust them with all my passwords. Are any of the founders well-known security experts? Has the service been recommended by respected security researchers? I am not a security expert, so I cannot assert their trustworthiness myself. I know that you can run your own server. But even then, without auditing the code, configuring a firewall, and…

I didn't pick Bitwarden right away. The comment that mentioned it prompted me to research password managers in general. I looked at primarily online (1Password, LastPass, Bitwarden, etc) and offline desktop client ones (Keepass). I do prefer the idea of using something like Keepass and not relying on a service but I found it rather frustrating to manage between my multiple devices. I knew if I were to actually make u…

FYI: KeePass plus Syncthing works great for me for cross-device password databases.

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would like to switch to Bitwarden, but I don't know how I can assure I can trust them with all my passwords. Are any of the founders well-known security experts? Has the service been recommended by respected security researchers? I am not a security expert, so I cannot assert their trustworthiness myself. I know that you can run your own server. But even then, without auditing the code, configuring a firewall, and…

I use KeePass as my password manager, it doesn't sync automatically across all my devices, I occasionaly transfer my keys database to my phone. You could always upload your encrypted key database to dropbox, and keep your private key on your phone, on your computer, or on a USB stick, if you want automatic sync.

Syncthing + KeePass works very well for cross device peer-to-peer syncing.

Just make sure to configure Syncthing to ignore KeePass lockfiles.

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately that's also where I'll stop during at least a few months after Firefox 57 is released. Quantum is ultra fast, but my extensions are more important. Greasemonkey and Stylish, for example, have equivalent WebExtensions, but they're not as polished. Same with DownThemAll. I think WebExtensions should have matured a bit longer, with Quantum, electrolysis, and Photon being made available for all with the old…

At least for the time being, you can use legacy extensions, by enabling the right option [1] in about:config. [1] extensions.legacy.enabled -> true

You can enable legacy extensions but this is not the same as being able to use them. Many significant and important-to-me legacy extensions (such as FireGestures) are currently non-functional on Firefox Nightly and have been for some time. I can only assume that Mozilla has decided that they don't care about keeping any legacy extensions working other than their own (they have some).

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel your pain, but I think your position of "please don't release new versions until you have compatibility with the plugins I, specifically, use" might be a tad unreasonable.

how so?

Because I you're not the only one using the browser?

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately, a profile backwards-incompatibility was added in FF55, IIRC, so if you're already on 56 you can't downgrade to 52.

A forum thread[1] suggests it may be possible to use the profile refresh functionality to recover most of the profile. Only problem is that it does not preserve extensions or settings. [1]: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=3032457

What does it preserve, then? (Bookmarks? That's the easy thing to restore. Transfer to another browser then transfer back.)

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn't pick Bitwarden right away. The comment that mentioned it prompted me to research password managers in general. I looked at primarily online (1Password, LastPass, Bitwarden, etc) and offline desktop client ones (Keepass). I do prefer the idea of using something like Keepass and not relying on a service but I found it rather frustrating to manage between my multiple devices. I knew if I were to actually make u…

FYI: KeePass plus Syncthing works great for me for cross-device password databases.

Will have to check this out. Not used Syncthing before. Thanks!

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A forum thread[1] suggests it may be possible to use the profile refresh functionality to recover most of the profile. Only problem is that it does not preserve extensions or settings. [1]: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=3032457

What does it preserve, then? (Bookmarks? That's the easy thing to restore. Transfer to another browser then transfer back.)

This link should clarify what is preserved by the refresh.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/refresh-firefox-reset-a...

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#170

Frustrated by the new "screenshots" tool. The "save" button automatically uploads your screenshot up to mozilla servers. The "download" button saves it to your computer. It seems completely backwards. The "save" button should save it to my computer (there's no reason call something a "download" when it's already local). The "download" button should be replaced with an "upload & share" button that sends it to mozilla'…

I've tried Developer's Edition, but gave up when I saw that Vimperator would not work on it.
Post reply on HN