Live data from Hacker News

Text-only CNN

lite.cnn.io

231–240 of 319 posts

Re: Text-only CNN

#231

Someone pointed out below, but in a comment way down in the thread, but CNN is actually who's behind this: https://twitter.com/CNN/status/906821174805630976 I'm not sure if the reason behind this is because of possible weak phone connections or that the hurricane is a good way to promote the text only site, but either way, huge shoutout to CNN for going forward with this themselves. I've thought for a while about scr…

[deleted]

Re: Text-only CNN

#233
Nice format, hopefully with some real unbiased content but I am not expected that at CNN though, nowadays the news has to be a mean value of (Reuters + NYT + CNN + Foxs + ....)/N, but I just do not have enough time to read them all, so I read HN instead.

Re: Text-only CNN

#234
post #192
post #185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it's a separate site? I have no idea. It takes 30 seconds to convince yourself it's theirs, though, so I'm not sure what you're asking me.

How did you manage to convince yourself it's theirs? Why couldn't they just put it on lite.cnn.com? If you try to look up the whois for cnn.io, you only get: Registrar: CSC Corporate Domains, Inc. Registrar IANA ID: 299 Registrar Abuse Contact Email: Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: Name Server: NS-24.AWSDNS-03.COM Name Server: NS-630.AWSDNS-14.NET Name Server: NS-1845.AWSDNS-38.CO.UK Name Server: NS-1268.AWSDNS-30.ORG…

>There is nothing here that indicates this is legit CNN?

Registering through CSC is difficult if you aren't a BigCo.

Re: Text-only CNN

#235

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is what CNN looked like on 9/11: http://i.imgur.com/tqnVwp6.jpg All the major sites switched to something like this when the internet slowed to a halt. I assume they've always had a minimal version ready in case something like it happens again.

I was working at AOL Time Warner on 9/11 and our team helped out the CNN team to keep that site online. It was a crazy experience. I recall that Sun Microsystems had provisioned a huge datacenter room full of gear for another AOL project as a sort of "try before you buy" deal. We spent the afternoon kickstarting those machines and bootstrapping them as CNN content servers. It was a huge struggle just to keep everythi…

Well thank you. I was in a college computer lab reading CNN's web page.

Re: Text-only CNN

#236
This might be counter-intuitive to types who comment here but the CNN Snapchat thread should also be appeasing to you for the same reasons this text-only site is. You go through their stories until you find the one you want and that's all you get. No ticker tape. No flashing "BREAKING NEWS" decorations and no fluff. It's the same concept only in a visual medium.

Re: Text-only CNN

#237
post #135
post #19

The absolute worst thing about cnn.com is the auto-playing videos. I've been in quiet places and clicked a CNN news link only to have a video start blasting on the speakers. It's not only annoying but a huge waste of mobile bandwidth. Now I just need an extension that rewrites all CNN urls to this site.

Disable HTML5 Autoplay https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/disable-html5-auto... works for me at the moment. You never know when the blighters will change the format though.

chrome://flags/

Search for "Autoplay policy" and change it to "Document user activation is required"

I haven't test it on other sites but in Youtube works fine.

Re: Text-only CNN

#238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is what CNN looked like on 9/11: http://i.imgur.com/tqnVwp6.jpg All the major sites switched to something like this when the internet slowed to a halt. I assume they've always had a minimal version ready in case something like it happens again.

I'd pay $5/month for a reputable news site to provide this all year long.

[deleted]

Re: Text-only CNN

#239
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Shame that thin.npr.org does not have HTTPS

Why do you need to encrypt your connection to that site? No sensitive info sent.

There's a whole website by the Freedom of the Press Foundation that addresses that question:

https://securethe.news

Post reply on HN