Text-only CNN
181–190 of 319 posts
Re: Text-only CNN
#182Re: Text-only CNN
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just a few reasons: * To overcome government censorship and surveillance. * To stop internet providers from injecting ads and tracking scripts.
>To overcome government censorship and surveillance. But the site isn't being censored? Also https won't stop the government from knowing that you connected to those servers. I agree that we want to avoid censorship and surveillance in general, but it really doesn't seem relevant here. >To stop internet providers from injecting ads and tracking scripts. Is your ISP actually doing that to you right now? Or is that jus…
Re: Text-only CNN
#184This is what the world needs. Seriously, I hate this trend to bloat up websites with the rage of a thousand suns. There is absolutely no value, but it increases bandwith usage, load times and CPU/RAM usage. News websites having "fancy, modern" websites actually make me think less of them. Fuck this web-bloat shit. The web is broken.
death to auto-playing video always and forever... CNN's site is especially bad about that, as I've experienced cases where I stop the "big" video at the top of the page and scroll down, only to have it start back up again when it moves to the sidebar.
Re: Text-only CNN
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems to be using the same CDN with the same hostnames as regular CNN, has their logos, their content, looks theirs.
Then why is it not on a subdomain of cnn.com? Anyone could copy their logo and their content.
Re: Text-only CNN
#186This is what the world needs. Seriously, I hate this trend to bloat up websites with the rage of a thousand suns. There is absolutely no value, but it increases bandwith usage, load times and CPU/RAM usage. News websites having "fancy, modern" websites actually make me think less of them. Fuck this web-bloat shit. The web is broken.
No value to the user, but all that bloat allows for analytics and tracking for more ad $ and the images make emotional manipulation easier to get more clicks. Not to mention that 99.9% of people don't care or don't even know what bandwidth, CPU, or RAM are.
...but they sure know what data rates are. Not that a website is the root of their data problems of course
Re: Text-only CNN
#187This is what the world needs. Seriously, I hate this trend to bloat up websites with the rage of a thousand suns. There is absolutely no value, but it increases bandwith usage, load times and CPU/RAM usage. News websites having "fancy, modern" websites actually make me think less of them. Fuck this web-bloat shit. The web is broken.
Re: Text-only CNN
#188Also, NPR has had a text only site for ages http://thin.npr.org
Read More ... ( 19213 bytes )
Brilliant!
Re: Text-only CNN
#189https://twitter.com/CNN/status/906821174805630976
I'm not sure if the reason behind this is because of possible weak phone connections or that the hurricane is a good way to promote the text only site, but either way, huge shoutout to CNN for going forward with this themselves.
I've thought for a while about scraping news sites to just show their text, or something like classifying articles based on their subjects from different ones. On this front, they did it first.
Re: Text-only CNN
#190https://hn.algolia.com/?query=convolut&sort=byPopularity&pre...