Live data from Hacker News

Statistics Professor Just Banned by Google: Here Is His Story

investingchannel.com

111–120 of 211 posts

Re: Statistics Professor Just Banned by Google: Here Is His Story

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ProtonMail is OpenPGP under the hood, not 'custom' encryption. Tutanota is custom.

Does this mean ProtonMail is more reliable? Would you recommend using ProtonMail?

It means that the crypto is certainly more solid (roll-your-own is a terrible idea in cryptography) and can in principle interoperate with other OpenPGP implementations, at least once the client supports it.

I like ProtonMail a lot, but full disclosure: I work there, so I'm biased.

Re: Statistics Professor Just Banned by Google: Here Is His Story

#112
post #60
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, Peterson is clearly politically active. For those who don't know, he rose from complete obscurity because he opposed an anti-transgender-discrimination bill in Canada. His argument was that it was a serious threat to free speech and would force him to use pronouns he didn't want to use, despite nothing like that being on the bill and despite numerous respectable legal scholars informing him that you could never…

>the supposed infiltration of Marxism into culture and ideas like White Privilege and Cultural Appropriation You can't argue that "white privilege" hasn't infiltrated culture. An alarming amount of people have openly disparaged white people when talking to me, even though I am white myself. If you're not white, it's almost socially acceptable to say "fuck white people" in cities like SF, NYC, and Chicago. I think it'…

If you're not white, it's almost socially acceptable to say "fuck white people" in cities like SF, NYC, and Chicago

I'm sure Google, CloudFlare, PayPal etc will be shutting down that blatant hate speech too.

Re: Statistics Professor Just Banned by Google: Here Is His Story

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We're already beginning to see this effect in "customer service" fields: talking with intellectually deficient and apathetic bots to solve any problem is the worst experience ever, and Google is leading the charge.

Google's AI jumbling up my search queries and insisting on answering entirely different questions from the one I asked has finally pushed me to duckduckgo (which is greatly improved and not yet as botty.) So I bet you're right thinking it's a demented bot. Such bots (and especially, "forests" of bots) tend to punish anything that's sufficiently eccentric. This could be countered by a separate forest of bots that look…

Fwiw. Duckduckgo is using Bing under the hood I believe.

Re: Statistics Professor Just Banned by Google: Here Is His Story

#114
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you find you have problems delivering to other mail servers? That has always been the trick. Running the mail server is easy. Having your email show up in other servers is "hard". Right now, with so many users using GMAIL, using gmail is a huge boon to not being marked spam (Google is way less likely to market a @gmail.com email as spam compared to say a @aol.com email).

I haven't had any issues but I've been hosting my own mail server since 2000 or so. I've been blacklisted by spamhaus? before years ago but I submitted a request to remove and they did. Google has a page to help with this though. https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126?hl=en&vid=0-107... Also, I personally host at home and have Comcast business internet. I have a 5 IP block of which one is a mail server. I have…

I'd like to add another voice to this: I host my own email myself out of my house, and I've never really had any problems with it either. AFAIK I've never been marked as spam, even after I've sent a couple of mis-configured emails that should have probably been marked as spam.

Re: Statistics Professor Just Banned by Google: Here Is His Story

#115

I wonder how much I would lose if my Gmail was deleted... Everything I have is behind that address. What would be my best bet to move to if I'm too much of a bad to host my own email?

using google's "takeout" feature you can back up all of your gmail/google acct data.

If they haven't already blocked you...

Re: Statistics Professor Just Banned by Google: Here Is His Story

#117
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

After review, your account is not eligible to be reinstated due to a violation of our Terms of Service. Doesn't sound like an accident.

"After review, ..." -- signed, an algorithm. Google is not a human facing company, you're most likely conversing with a bot even when you don't think you are.

Even if it is an algorithm: So? Just because an algorithm made the bad call doesn't mean it's OK.

Re: Statistics Professor Just Banned by Google: Here Is His Story

#118
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven't had any issues but I've been hosting my own mail server since 2000 or so. I've been blacklisted by spamhaus? before years ago but I submitted a request to remove and they did. Google has a page to help with this though. https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126?hl=en&vid=0-107... Also, I personally host at home and have Comcast business internet. I have a 5 IP block of which one is a mail server. I have…

I'd like to add another voice to this: I host my own email myself out of my house, and I've never really had any problems with it either. AFAIK I've never been marked as spam, even after I've sent a couple of mis-configured emails that should have probably been marked as spam.

Have you ever done mailing list work? Like run a mailing list with a few tens of thousand users?

Re: Statistics Professor Just Banned by Google: Here Is His Story

#120
post #74
post #55

I can't imagine how people depend so heavily on free accounts from Google. Which notoriously ignores help requests. And typically don't retain backups. Seriously? But bottom line, it's Google's business what they do. And with a free account, there's no recourse. Except maybe getting to HN front page, and reaching someone sympathetic at Google.

I mean, they have _millions_ of users that have never had a problem. It's far more likely this is a mistake than any kind of malicious act, just given the sheer number of customers they have.

If it only happens to one out of millions, why can't they have an actual responsive human being to respond to queries?

"We have so many zillion customers that we're forced to use bots for customer service" and "Only one out of a zillion customers has this kind of problem" would seem to be mutually exclusive.

Post reply on HN