Earlier quoted context omitted.
This seems backwards: network neutrality ensures that anyone is free to setup a host with whatever rules they want. If you treat the network as a neutral layer, there's less risk if a particular service chooses not to support something — whereas in a world of paid prioritization you'd have to worry about, say, paid prioritization or outright blocking as well as the other costs. (This is one of the reasons I'm not a f…
My point was not about whether net neutrality is right or wrong, but that the same person sometimes protests AGAINST net neutrality when it fits their agenda, and sometimes pretend as if they're the guardian of the justice who's supposed to guard net neutrality. That's hypocritical. People should instead have rational conversation about pros and cons and make an informed decision, but that's impossible nowadays becau…
That said, I do wish your argument would not be downvoted, even if I think you're wrong.