Live data from Hacker News

The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

lil.law.harvard.edu

151–160 of 167 posts

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#151
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same as if I drive down a street ten years later... I can't expect the street to be a time-capsule to mt memories.

Old buildings stand until they decay or we run out of space nearby and demolish them. HTML doesn't decay and we can't run out of URLs; web pages only disappear because our hosting infrastructure needlessly demands ongoing payment from (only!) the author. I say "needlessly" because the actual cost of storage, CPU, and networks are dropping so quickly that hosting a page forever should asymptotically approach a fixed c…

> I say "needlessly" because the actual cost of storage, CPU, and networks are dropping so quickly that hosting a page forever should asymptotically approach a fixed cost that isn't much more than the first few years.

As someone who's been involved in internet hosting since the days of dial-up, that's just not true. Or rather, it's not the whole picture. Hardware breaks and becomes unsupported. Dynamic pages run on software that rots. Is a hosting provider expected to still support pages that run on SSI, CGI with Perl that requires libraries that haven't been updated in 15 years and are full of security holes?

Who's going to pay to move websites to new hardware? For the trouble of ensuring backups are working properly? For reacting to legal problems?

Hosting involves a lot more than sticking a .html page behind an internet connection. Software rots. Webpages rot. Someone has to be paid to provide upkeep.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Either that, or the homepage owner doesn't want to pay the hosting (bandwidth) costs, so he/she just references the Way Back machine. This is kinda brilliant.

That doesn't seem to be the case: curl -v http://www.milliondollarhomepage.com/index_files/widgets.js returns an HTTP 200 (not a 301/302). Additionally, the comment says: /* FILE ARCHIVED ON 5:47:20 Aug 6, 2015 AND RETRIEVED FROM THE INTERNET ARCHIVE ON 20:45:19 Aug 24, 2015. JAVASCRIPT APPENDED BY WAYBACK MACHINE, COPYRIGHT INTERNET ARCHIVE. ALL OTHER CONTENT MAY ALSO BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT (17 U.S.C. SECTION 108…

The '/index_files/' bit seems to imply someone went to the internet archive, pulled up milliondollarhomepage, and then in a Browser, did 'Save As Webpage Complete' which saves the main page (in this case index.htm) and all its assets in a sub folder called 'index_files'.

They then just copied it all as-is back into some web hosting.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#153

FWIW, I'm building https://PageDash.com as a private web archive to address the problem of link rot, beginning from a personal level. Launching in late August. Think of it as a private version of perma.cc.

lol, you found your domain on impossibility, didn't you.

lol, not sure I got what you meant by that :P lucky me I guess :)

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#154
post #2

The Million Dollar Homepage is not decaying (it is still serving its million dollar purpose) - it is the Web itself that has decayed. The brittleness of URIs is on full display. "Cool URLs don't change," but most of these URLs were never cool: they had to rent coolness from Internet cool kid Alex Tew.

It's a frame of reference problem. Note that this article is published by a library research group. One of the hottest topics in library science is how to archive and reference the WWW. While it's entirely valid to view the Million Dollar Web Page as a decaying artifact (let's call this the Art Critic view), it is also possible to view it as an archaeological record that needs its links to be complete (let's call thi…

Librarians are always worried about preserving garbage, which is what the Million Dollar Web Page is. Now before you downvote me, bear in mind I did Information Science in grad school, so I hung around with a lot of librarians. I know the librarian hoarder mindset pretty well.

The point I'm trying to make is that the Internet is a different kind of thing than a library, it is more dynamic (which is good and bad) and generally a more living and lived-in type of medium. MDH was a money making scheme. Clever? Maybe. Intended to be long-lasting? Doubtful.

It's a cool article, nonetheless.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#155

I think in many ways it is not a 'decaying digital artifact' as it is an excellent representation of the fallacy upon which a lot of the Internet hangs. In the Library of Alexandria you didn't have scrolls disappear because the kingdom where they originated had been crushed under the boot of an invader. But the Internet is no great library, no respository of knowledge, or an oasis of independent thought. The Internet…

Yes - and a different economic model for maintenance than the Library of Alexandria. In this case, the library didn't fail. The ecosystem around it did.

The library burned down, iirc. Largely due to societal rot as you suggest--invasions, pestilence, and probably the deaths of the original founders and their vision did not translate to the following generations.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#157
post #119
post #109

I wonder how he got everything to fit as more and more space was sold and if it was a manual process? It must have been like playing Tetris on expert mode.

The way it worked was that as you bought, you could select the region that you wanted. You would be charged based on the number of pixels in the region. I actually have seen the server that it was on. The hosting company provided free hosting to it for several years (at least 8 IIRC). I think that at some point the server died and Alex Tew decided to move elsewhere. At one point, he had the million dollar pixel lotto…

So it was like buying tickets online? if multiple people were interested in the same region, the one which payment went through first got the region? However, this must still have been chaotic once the interest started to rise as space would seem empty until the payment was confirmed, and others would try to buy in the meantime. I guess you would also just have to make a rough estimate on the design of your banner and just buy the space, no time to design it first.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#158
post #109

I wonder how he got everything to fit as more and more space was sold and if it was a manual process? It must have been like playing Tetris on expert mode.

After some research I'm now able to provide an answer to my own question.

The canvas was partitoned into blocks of 10x10 pixels that was white until sold. You would make a payment for X number of blocks through 2Checkout or PayPal. After transferring the money, you would send an e-mail to Alex Tew with the image, coordinates of wanted blocks, URL and TITLE/ALT text. He would then confirm the payment and upload your banner within 48 hours.

So the entire operation was manual with orders placed by e-mail.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#159

I just heard about the "Million Dollar Homepage" for the first time last week. Would this idea (or one like it) work today? Making a million dollars for something so bizarre, fun, and straightforward sounds amazing. Can anyone reference other attempts at similar ideas?

reddit's recent April Fool's experiment. They had a blank 10,000x10,000px (?) canvas where people could manipulate 1 pixel at a time with time constraints. No money involved, but seeing the panoply of different subcultures come together was unbelievably fascinating.

Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact

#160
post #125
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But, and I feel like I'm going to get a proverbial reprimand for asking the obvious, but why, in all this time, has no solution been proposed?

"No perfect solution has been proposed." might be more accurate.

That sounds like a excellent opportunity for corporate IT departments to make a good haul of PR and general kudos, for making a effort to release their archived caches, wherever they may be stored due to data retention policies.

I have a huge soft spot for projects where you can get the most happening because you are not required to jump a known hurdle to usefully contribute.

Overnight I was fretting with the necessity of sorting out any residual legal issues that might attach to digging out old cache dumps.

But forgetting the fact that the very same companies are commonly invested in just the tech to sort out the problem,.

Problem being one which can present all kinds of ways. Do you have any chance of finding adult content in your cache? Do you care about how much you are seen surfing the competition's websites? Will URLs reveal that anonymous forum login from 2002, slagging your rivals benchmarking? Did you put Squid on your intranet or webmaster, without https because your predecessor thought it was on the non routeing private range? Did you use DNS in any way to point to document resources that are accessible to users via the proxy server and Squid?

Anyhow lots of data protection suites have been used to purge archives and remove any trace of activity or files best kept private.

That's how the latest HDS kit is sold : cluster FS with hyperconverged local nodes crunching security, audit and search results.

I'm sure I'm only wishing on a prayer that you can find great troves for redecorating the empty space that the WWW once pointed to.

But imagine that we really could fill enough gaps in the dead link forests!

Even just attempting could be a superb way to promote your storage products and bless your customers who offer up the raw stores with lots of great ways to engage regular journalists with the subject.

I totally live best effort projects, and especially the ambitious culturally interesting ones.

So does Joe Public.

I'm in.

Where do we start?

(if I have the time, I'm quite serious about this, my profession is advertising not online but the traditional way of doing it. I have just got my head back from exploding with the multitude of ways to sell, promote, demo, boast, reminisce, predict, forecast, warn people about how society will crumble without personal all flash arrays... Last one might be pushing it a bit, but I see a fantastic deal of business on the back of the idea. It's beautiful because everyone is invited to participate, no vendor or company is locked out. So the public is not getting the boring official line and canned quotes. This is real people showing the technology but showing the extent to which we discard valuable culture. For thousands of years mankind grew as our means of recording documentation and thought and expression grew. Look now how easily we will throw it all away!!!! I know we can do better.

Post reply on HN