Earlier quoted context omitted.
I had the same reaction when I saw the blood-boy thing going on last season. Then I found out where the idea came from...
Oh God, is that a thing that actually happens in the real SV too? I thought the show made that up.
The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact
121–130 of 167 posts
Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact
#122Decaying in more than one way. The JS files on milliondollarhomepage.com start with: /* FILE ARCHIVED ON 5:47:20 Aug 6, 2015 AND RETRIEVED FROM THE INTERNET ARCHIVE ON 20:45:17 Aug 24, 2015. JAVASCRIPT APPENDED BY WAYBACK MACHINE, COPYRIGHT INTERNET ARCHIVE. ALL OTHER CONTENT MAY ALSO BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT (17 U.S.C. SECTION 108(a)(3)). */ I guess someone didn't keep backups?
Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact
#123I actually purchased a $300 spot on this. I did get quite a few clicks, but very low-quality traffic. Mostly, I got lots of offers from copycat sites to join their "billion dollar" homepage or whatnot. It's crazy how many copycats came out, very unoriginal thinking going on.
I too bought, about $800, at the bottom right, to place the words "Million Dollar Script". The script cost $50 a pop, and allowed you to make a self-hosted copycat site. I was quite busy for the next few months as orders kept rushing in! I've also had a few competitors pop up & the script was pirated, including some selling it on ebay, they even forgot to remove my contact email, so their customers were coming to me…
Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
What about personal caches? I know that few people likely keep locally saved Web pages in near line accessibility. But if you only build the tool, I would happily mount the nearly 5 terabytes of ULTRASCSI drives I've got in storage, which were largely Squid cache snapshots, from my office WAN proxy box.
Yes does anything like this exist? I would love to remember all of my surfing. I currently bookmark nearly 100% of my visited links.
Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
The article does not purport to have a solution to this problem. It is a contribution to an ongoing effort to describe the problem and understand it so that solutions may be pursued.
But, and I feel like I'm going to get a proverbial reprimand for asking the obvious, but why, in all this time, has no solution been proposed?
Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
The article does not purport to have a solution to this problem. It is a contribution to an ongoing effort to describe the problem and understand it so that solutions may be pursued.
But, and I feel like I'm going to get a proverbial reprimand for asking the obvious, but why, in all this time, has no solution been proposed?
Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
The article does not purport to have a solution to this problem. It is a contribution to an ongoing effort to describe the problem and understand it so that solutions may be pursued.
But, and I feel like I'm going to get a proverbial reprimand for asking the obvious, but why, in all this time, has no solution been proposed?
Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
The article does not purport to have a solution to this problem. It is a contribution to an ongoing effort to describe the problem and understand it so that solutions may be pursued.
But, and I feel like I'm going to get a proverbial reprimand for asking the obvious, but why, in all this time, has no solution been proposed?
Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact
#129I just heard about the "Million Dollar Homepage" for the first time last week. Would this idea (or one like it) work today? Making a million dollars for something so bizarre, fun, and straightforward sounds amazing. Can anyone reference other attempts at similar ideas?
You didn't notice because the people who created them didn't, either.
Re: The “Million Dollar Homepage” as a Decaying Digital Artifact
#130Decaying in more than one way. The JS files on milliondollarhomepage.com start with: /* FILE ARCHIVED ON 5:47:20 Aug 6, 2015 AND RETRIEVED FROM THE INTERNET ARCHIVE ON 20:45:17 Aug 24, 2015. JAVASCRIPT APPENDED BY WAYBACK MACHINE, COPYRIGHT INTERNET ARCHIVE. ALL OTHER CONTENT MAY ALSO BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT (17 U.S.C. SECTION 108(a)(3)). */ I guess someone didn't keep backups?
Either that, or the homepage owner doesn't want to pay the hosting (bandwidth) costs, so he/she just references the Way Back machine. This is kinda brilliant.
curl -v http://www.milliondollarhomepage.com/index_files/widgets.js
returns an HTTP 200 (not a 301/302). Additionally, the comment says: /*
FILE ARCHIVED ON 5:47:20 Aug 6, 2015 AND RETRIEVED FROM THE
INTERNET ARCHIVE ON 20:45:19 Aug 24, 2015.
JAVASCRIPT APPENDED BY WAYBACK MACHINE, COPYRIGHT INTERNET ARCHIVE.
ALL OTHER CONTENT MAY ALSO BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT (17 U.S.C.
SECTION 108(a)(3)).
*/
Note the dates. It was archived on Aug 6, 2015 and retrieved just 18 days later on Aug 24, 2015. Given it's 2017, there's no way this file is being served directly from archive.org's servers.