Earlier quoted context omitted.
If this is the case for hackers then I can at least see a very good reason for it. The _only_ reason I learned to program was for the power it gives me to create new things and explore whatever I want. Take that away from me? Forget it, I'll do any number of occupations where I can earn more.
But some things are hard or impossible to achieve alone, so teaming up with others might be necessary.
Why Student Programmers Rant about Business Students with “Ideas”
31–40 of 42 posts
Re: Why Student Programmers Rant about Business Students with “Ideas”
#32Let it die this already. I think this has been beaten to death. A businness type, with just an idea, without any hackers, or capital to implement it, is just day dreaming. And it is annoying when they think they deserve more than half of the company just b/c of that idea.... If they were providing more than that, capital, connections, userbase, community or something significant, then yes that idea is more than just…
>>> A CS major can easily go to MBA and be good at it, will the reverse is very rare The technical/science degree to MBA path is there for a reason and is extremely common. A lot of people work in a technical job for five years and then decide that they'd rather move on to management then spend the rest of there careers as programmers, engineers, biologists, etc. If there was an good enough reason for a business unde…
It's a cost-benefit tradeoff and you're only considering the benefits while treating the costs equal.
I surmise it's easier for a person without a business background to pick up an MBA than it is for a non-CS/Math/Eng person to pick up a Masters in any of those fields. The learning curves and requirements are different.
Re: Why Student Programmers Rant about Business Students with “Ideas”
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
I made another note to the essay. What I mean to say is that successful programmers will try business, but what successful business people try engineering? But "trying to" is not a sufficient condition for "succeeding at."
Like I said, generally I agree with the article, and it makes some good points. But the button-pusher for me (and the point I'm trying to make) is that labeling the technically adept as "socially awkward" is about as acceptable as saying that black people have "soul", poor people have "dignity", women are more "empathetic", and business-people are "aggressive", as though the one naturally leads to another. I honestly…
But stereotypes shouldn't be taboo for reasonable discussion here. That something is uncomfortable to talk about doesn't make it false or nonsense. In fact, I find that uncomfortable subjects are most interesting to explore because they force you to consider what you otherwise prefer not to believe.
Re: Why Student Programmers Rant about Business Students with “Ideas”
#34Unfortunately all these discussions are too filled with obnoxious generalizations to be useful. In my experience good business people are rare and when you find them you should keep them. I am a science PhD with my own company and my first business development person (MBA dropout - employee number 5) is worth his weight in gold. He brought a customer focus and an outward orientation that few hackers are capable of. O…
And I agree that there are many generalizations, and I purposely avoided hedging language to pad them. They do not apply to everyone in all cases, which is why they are generalizations. If you could argue that these generalizations are false or that it is false that they are widely held ---that could be interesting.
Re: Why Student Programmers Rant about Business Students with “Ideas”
#35Since the first boom, the number of wildly successful tech companies started solely by engineers far outnumbers those started by business guys, backed up by some engineers. The smart money has followed along, such that the "business" requirements a VC looks for are pretty slim. They no longer care if you have an MBA on the team. Not even a little bit. I know this to be true, because I've talked to a half dozen VCs and a few angels. They don't care that our company is two hackers working out of our houses. They care that we've built something that millions of people use daily.
You need a business plan, sure, but it can be eight pages and mostly charts. Any hacker with a couple hours to kill and a word processor and spreadsheet, a deep understanding of their business and their market, and a couple of example business plans, can make that happen. You need a monetization strategy that makes sense, but business guys are no better equipped to come up with this than the hackers who spend half their time researching the competition and other businesses that work in similar fields (hackers are obsessive compulsive about research, so it comes very naturally). The most successful monetization strategy of the last ten years (context sensitive ads) was created by a nerd.
The stereotypical nerd no longer matches the stereotype. I've seen it at several companies where I've contracted over the years. Older developers (say, 40+) are nerdy in the traditional sense. A little overweight, a little socially inept, a little insecure in meetings except when discussing their particular interests, etc. The younger ones are generally healthier than average, more likely to have hot girlfriends/boyfriends, aggressive enough in meetings to handle even the most boisterous business guy, and full of the confidence that comes only from having a really firm grasp on your subject. It's not always true, but true enough that I feel confident saying it about the majority of great engineers. And, good engineers are no longer broke...they make a lot of money when they want to work for another company. Not MBA money, but they aren't desperate for any crumbs you want to throw their way. If the engineer you're talking to is desperate, he's not a good engineer, or at least, hasn't had the time in the market to establish that he's a good engineer. A BS in computer science has recently become the highest paying four year degree for first-time job seekers.
Business guys can certainly bring things to the table--but a hacker no longer needs one in the roster to raise money or build a successful company. They may hire one later, when the business side of the business is a full-time job.
So, I can understand business guys feeling a bit upset by this turn of events...and they can certainly point to lots of hacker-founded failures that made major business mistakes. But the road of MBA-founded tech startups is also littered with innumerable failures, for many of the same reasons (and a few additional ones, like: failure to deal with technology appropriately).
MBAs are certainly useful. They make a lot of money in established companies for a reason--starting salary for MBAs at Google is higher than for a fresh-out-of school engineer. But a tech startup doesn't NEED an MBA to reach a reasonable level of success. Accept it and move on. Sure, you can still start a tech startup, if you're a "business guy"...but you need a hacker, so you'd better get used to treating them as a partner rather than an employee and someone you can look down on as socially inferior. We've got hotter girlfriends than you, now, you know?
Re: Why Student Programmers Rant about Business Students with “Ideas”
#36The funny thing about all of these rants is that they reflect an outmoded understanding of the engineer/MBA dynamic in the tech business. Since the first boom, the number of wildly successful tech companies started solely by engineers far outnumbers those started by business guys, backed up by some engineers. The smart money has followed along, such that the "business" requirements a VC looks for are pretty slim. The…
A quick flickr search for "ycombinator" suggests the opposite...
Re: Why Student Programmers Rant about Business Students with “Ideas”
#37The funny thing about all of these rants is that they reflect an outmoded understanding of the engineer/MBA dynamic in the tech business. Since the first boom, the number of wildly successful tech companies started solely by engineers far outnumbers those started by business guys, backed up by some engineers. The smart money has followed along, such that the "business" requirements a VC looks for are pretty slim. The…
"The stereotypical nerd no longer matches the stereotype. " A quick flickr search for "ycombinator" suggests the opposite...
Perhaps you haven't looked at the average American lately...
Re: Why Student Programmers Rant about Business Students with “Ideas”
#38The funny thing about all of these rants is that they reflect an outmoded understanding of the engineer/MBA dynamic in the tech business. Since the first boom, the number of wildly successful tech companies started solely by engineers far outnumbers those started by business guys, backed up by some engineers. The smart money has followed along, such that the "business" requirements a VC looks for are pretty slim. The…
Given this hypothesis, it would be best to be an engineer in one's 20's and then transition to a more strategic business identity in one's 30's and beyond.
This fits your new YC founder profile.
Re: Why Student Programmers Rant about Business Students with “Ideas”
#39The funny thing about all of these rants is that they reflect an outmoded understanding of the engineer/MBA dynamic in the tech business. Since the first boom, the number of wildly successful tech companies started solely by engineers far outnumbers those started by business guys, backed up by some engineers. The smart money has followed along, such that the "business" requirements a VC looks for are pretty slim. The…
Maybe a technical identity required to start a web software startup peak in one's late 20's because good technology perpetually abstracts itself irrelevant, but an interpersonal business skills continue to improve as one builds a professional network and earns experience. Given this hypothesis, it would be best to be an engineer in one's 20's and then transition to a more strategic business identity in one's 30's and…
Re: Why Student Programmers Rant about Business Students with “Ideas”
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe a technical identity required to start a web software startup peak in one's late 20's because good technology perpetually abstracts itself irrelevant, but an interpersonal business skills continue to improve as one builds a professional network and earns experience. Given this hypothesis, it would be best to be an engineer in one's 20's and then transition to a more strategic business identity in one's 30's and…
I'm not sure I buy this. I think the best hackers (perhaps not the same as engineers) have a certain mindset that doesn't go away. The oldest working developer I've ever worked with also happens to be the fellow that turned me on to Ruby AND Lua, when nobody on Reddit was talking about them (actually before reddit existed) and nobody else in the office was tinkering with them. He just had a roving interest in technol…
There's nothing wrong with that, but it's not what I would expect from, say, a multi-million dollar CEO in semi-retirement. Maybe more a member of the board or a private investor who works on various fun projects.