Earlier quoted context omitted.
Being a billionaire definitely helps, but it's not really a massive advantage to be a multimillionaire. I have a few wealthy friends (single digit millionaires) who still struggle with dating.
Seriously? Why? Do they expect young supermodels to date them?
McClure steps back at 500Startups after internal sexual misconduct investigation
181–190 of 201 posts
Re: McClure steps back at 500Startups after internal sexual misconduct investigation
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have seen questionable material come from him [1]: Examples: "Money Shot" with kitten spreadings its legs and "Great Products...Get you LAID". [1] https://www.slideshare.net/dmc500hats/how-to-pitch-a-vc-or-a... edit: link directly to slides and deleted nested comment.
To be fair, the second slide directly says it is guaranteed to offend.
Re: McClure steps back at 500Startups after internal sexual misconduct investigation
#183Re: McClure steps back at 500Startups after internal sexual misconduct investigation
#184Without defending anyone, My honest takeout by the whole sexual harassment threshold in the bay area or the US in general is that you could never end up together or even married with a colleague in that paranoid atmosphere. Which is exactly what I did where I live in Italy. Happily married and yes, after saying things to a colleague of mine that would have made me accused in the bay area.
Re: McClure steps back at 500Startups after internal sexual misconduct investigation
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a difference between being involved with a peer or with someone outside your reporting structure on the org chart, and being involved with someone who is inside your reporting structure. It's the differential in power when combined with sexual advances that creates problems, not the sexual advances alone. Of course, unwanted sexual advances are a problem regardless of the relationship of the two parties, but…
Relationships with a power differential are common in the US too. Women generally date up. This is especially common within professions with a high status since it is difficult to meet someone equal/better. View https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2016-who-marries-whom/ People generally are poor at reading others and end up pushing too far or getting offended easily ( not referring to this case) What's more likely to…
As for "women generally date up", that is a near tautology given the imbalance in power generally between men and women. By the mere fact that men overwhelmingly hold positions of power, women will typically "date up". There is no way around that. So it's not a useful statistic and certainly isn't evidence of anything.
Re: McClure steps back at 500Startups after internal sexual misconduct investigation
#186I hope each and every person is exposed and held accountable for their actions.
It's inspiring to see all the women who are standing up and speaking out about these issues.
Re: McClure steps back at 500Startups after internal sexual misconduct investigation
#187Slightly OT: Everyone wants to become a CEO or VC. But the truth is you don't want to. You'll miss the times when you were a naive intern who could mess around with just everyone you met both on a private and professional level. Once you juggle millions it's over. The slightest advance is treated--with good reason--as sexual harassment.
That's only true strictly in the context of dating within the professional pool. I would argue that having more money and power is good in general, but NOT for dating subordinates and coworkers.
Without noticing you become quickly a public face the more powerful you get. Then, even in a private context you have to be careful who you approach, how you approach and how many. Often private and professional environments are not clearly separated as well.
Let's take again the intern example: There's nothing wrong with a cocky intern approaching and kiss-closing dozens of women on a night out. There's nothing wrong doing this every Friday and Saturday. But some CEOs or VCs would face immediate trouble if such behaviour even in a private context would become public.
Their life isn't better.
Re: McClure steps back at 500Startups after internal sexual misconduct investigation
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well it definitely has an affect, the only difference is everybody is either ok with it or indifferent to it. If all of a sudden Jimmy's wife starts being an asshole and gets fired then what? You don't think it would be handled differently if the head writer wasn't his wife? Just like this Facebook message thing. If she had been receptive to it, everybody is cool. But since she wasn't all of a sudden we've got the pi…
I mean there's also a couple other things that differentiates McClure's situation. He's also married. He seems to have accelerated the harassment immediately. Obviously I don't know the details, but it doesn't seem like he was just asking her out on a date. And if he did then clearly she wasn't receptive and he should have stopped. I think it's pretty easy to see that there's a clear violation on McClure's side.
Re: McClure steps back at 500Startups after internal sexual misconduct investigation
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If he wanted a relationship, there are infinitely better and more appropriate ways to go about it, especially if he thought she might actually be interested. McClure aside, in general situation when during recruitment precess you meet someone you would like to date is there really a way to go about it that doesn't end badly? Message during recruitment is plain creepy. Asking them out after they are hired is bad for…
This isn't actually that complicated. There are seven billion people in the world, you choose one of the ones that you aren't professionally compromised with to date. Period. Life is full of situations where you have to choose between two competing positive values. It's part of being an adult.
Re: McClure steps back at 500Startups after internal sexual misconduct investigation
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's only true strictly in the context of dating within the professional pool. I would argue that having more money and power is good in general, but NOT for dating subordinates and coworkers.
Yes, you are right, but it's not that easy. Also the private environment has its pitfalls. Without noticing you become quickly a public face the more powerful you get. Then, even in a private context you have to be careful who you approach, how you approach and how many. Often private and professional environments are not clearly separated as well. Let's take again the intern example: There's nothing wrong with a coc…
It's not rocket science. You can fool around with as many women as you want, as long as those women aren't subordinate to you in their professional roles. It's when you insist on mixing your business with your pleasure that you get yourself into trouble.
I legitimately cannot understand why so many men have so much trouble understanding this.