Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love how you say Africans would have been better under benevolent European rule and also say Brits should free themselves from European rule (however good it is), in a single comment.
Well, I'm looking at things how they currently are in 2017. I support self-determination of Africans (and subsequently all people), but that doesn't mean they wouldn't be better off right now under British rule. The British (and others, like the Dutch) never should have colonized Africa (or anywhere else), but they did. Likewise, I can acknowledge that the British are probably worse-off for leaving the EU, but also s…
Heaven:
British cops
German mechanics
French chefs
Italian lovers
Swiss administrators
Hell:
German cops
French mechanics
British chefs
Swiss lovers
Italian administrators
Some nation-tribes are better at governance than others. Their countries might be objectively better if they were administered by another nation-tribe, but then it wouldn't be their country.Rhodesia was certainly a better international trading partner than Zimbabwe is now, but at least Zimbabwe is unequivocally owned by the Zimbabweans. Other countries don't exist solely for the benefit of their international trade partners.