Earlier quoted context omitted.
if you accountant was a computer. We have to stop this madness of thinking that "John READS my diary" means the same thing as "The function fread() READS nitems objects". Those don't mean the same thing except in a metaphorical sense. It's insane.
It's not about who reads it, it's about who has access. If a system has access to read my email as plain text, it means anyone who owns or can get access to that system can read my email. Some one wrote fread, it could've been john, and john absolutely could be reading your email. Look at the what happened with ubers god mode. That said the value of gmail for me exceeds the risk of people I care about reading my emai…
Google Will Stop Reading Your Emails for Gmail Ads
301–310 of 460 posts
Re: Google Will Stop Reading Your Emails for Gmail Ads
#302Will there still be a way to opt-in? This seems like one of those decisions that is a net negative for functionality in favor of quelling some misguided privacy concerns. Hopefully this doesn't lessen the quality of ads by much.
Re: Google Will Stop Reading Your Emails for Gmail Ads
#303I very recently switched to fastmail and couldn't be happier. For $90 a year, I don't have to deal with people snooping and tracking me around for ads. I know google is trying to give me value with all their facial recognition and recommendations, but I don't think it is going to end well. When it does end badly, it will be too late for the user because we would've given up all the data. I don't want Google to build…
Re: Google Will Stop Reading Your Emails for Gmail Ads
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
To play Devil's advocate, the ads benefit you because they make Gmail free.
I would rather pay and do not share anything with Google (or for that matter all of Google's partners who can purchase our data)
I'm pretty sure that's the empty set.
Re: Google Will Stop Reading Your Emails for Gmail Ads
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
[I'm stupid they have 2FA, ignore this comment.] Another huge problem is the lack of two-factor authentication. How can a security-oriented service not offer TOTP or even SMS 2FA.
2FA has been out for almost 6 months.
Re: Google Will Stop Reading Your Emails for Gmail Ads
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
Depends. Is that drone providing me with some other useful service, or is it following me around entirely without my knowledge or consent? Gmail provides me with a free email service. They already have the full text of all my emails. If they want to use that data to help decide what ads to serve me, I have no problem with that so long as that data isn't shared with anyone else without my consent.
> data isn't shared with anyone else without my consent Do you have any way of verifying this? I am not accusing google of anything, I just find this to be an interesting level of trust to have with a free online service.
I didn't even say not to trust google, I just questioned the level of trust.
Re: Google Will Stop Reading Your Emails for Gmail Ads
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
That directive might be related to what's happening. But let's not be naive: if Google will stop reading our emails in order to send us personalized ads, that's because it doesn't really need to. People share just enough outside their email environment for Google to do its thing. Another sign of which those worrying about privacy should be aware.
Exactly. Google already knows a shit ton about you, and given how data driven they are, I guarantee they came to the conclusion that they would still be able to show highly targeted ads with little or no loss in revenue or click-through-rates rates. Heck, dollars to donuts they've already A/B tested the shit out of it to reach this conclusion.
Re: Google Will Stop Reading Your Emails for Gmail Ads
#308I very recently switched to fastmail and couldn't be happier. For $90 a year, I don't have to deal with people snooping and tracking me around for ads. I know google is trying to give me value with all their facial recognition and recommendations, but I don't think it is going to end well. When it does end badly, it will be too late for the user because we would've given up all the data. I don't want Google to build…
I tried Fastmail for a while but I just couldn't deal with the spam. There was a lot of spam and Gmail's filters seem to be better at dealing with it.
Re: Google Will Stop Reading Your Emails for Gmail Ads
#309This most likely is a pragmatic financial decision. Contextual advertising is generating a lower CPM than data/person based advertising. Said differently the relevance that can be extracted from your specific email is less than the cumulative knowledge that Google has about you from other sources.
Re: Google Will Stop Reading Your Emails for Gmail Ads
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wouldn't Google be able to largely mitigate the effects of that if they wanted to by making it so accounts that do not consent to the scanning get smaller mailboxes or do not get spam filtering or something like that? I'd expect that would get most of its users to consent.
They could but is it worth it? I suspect the scanning of emails hasn't yielded the personalization once hoped. And the bad publicity outweighs any future potential.