Is there a website like HN that's actually focused/moderated and doesn't mix Cosmo type clickbait with actual news?
To Stay in Love, Sign on the Dotted Line
21–30 of 94 posts
Re: To Stay in Love, Sign on the Dotted Line
#22Can't wait until they have to litigate this one!
Re: To Stay in Love, Sign on the Dotted Line
#23Re: To Stay in Love, Sign on the Dotted Line
#24I know god knows how much families in my home country (Russia) who had no problems living together to old age without having to do anything special. I also know god knows how much dysfunctional families as well. I knew quite a few oddbals too, a couple that were still lovey dovey and dating casually for close to 12 years since their mid-teens. I knew a married couple that everybody suspected to be "mutually-infidel," yet they had a really strong bond.
It is all luck and compatibility/synergies of individual differences
Re: To Stay in Love, Sign on the Dotted Line
#25The older I get, the more I come around to the conclusion that thought is bad.
Re: To Stay in Love, Sign on the Dotted Line
#26Sounds strange, and horrible. A relationship isn't a business.`
Sounds like someone who never met a divorce/family law attorney. In California legally speaking part your relationship is treated as such.
Re: To Stay in Love, Sign on the Dotted Line
#27Better title: "To stay in love, communicate honestly and openly" | these guys just happened to find a way to do that in writing
Re: To Stay in Love, Sign on the Dotted Line
#28Why is this allowed on HN? It's not tech, startups or anything in between. Is there a website like HN that's actually focused/moderated and doesn't mix Cosmo type clickbait with actual news?
Re: To Stay in Love, Sign on the Dotted Line
#29Better title: "To stay in love, communicate honestly and openly" | these guys just happened to find a way to do that in writing
"Trust" also happens to be the foundation for a good relationship.
Re: To Stay in Love, Sign on the Dotted Line
#30The title of the article is "To Stay in Love, Sign on the Dotted Line," but there's absolutely nothing in it that supports the title. All it is is about an unmarried woman whose been in a relationship for only 3 years saying a scheduled conversations and paper an pen (or keyboard in this case) helps her have relationship communication.
The title should really be "communication is helpful for my new relationship."
It's misguided at best to conclude every couple should create this sort of formal contract. Every couple communicates differently.