Hmmmm. Without knowing the details of how the image was created it's hard to say whether this is especially interesting or not. For example - why would a 3D model based on high-quality photogrammetry be any less "real" than a digital photograph. It's just a few more stages in a processing pipeline that starts with his real face. If however - there was no photographic source material - either for geometry or textures…
Because it isn't. It shows that you can get a digital ID based on the photograph of an entity that technically never existed, it's a texture map around human shaped blank, not a photograph of a human. You can bet that to the authorities this is a real problem.