Live data from Hacker News

Too many people are buying cars using financial products they do not understand

timharford.com

171–180 of 330 posts

Re: Too many people are buying cars using financial products they do not understand

#171
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a lot more to this than a simple equation. Otherwise we would all borrow as much as we could (about 2% and somewhat predictable) and put it all in the stock market (avg 7,5 % but volatile).

Anyone willing to give me a loan for $10m at 2% -- I'm game. 2% is a good interest rate for a collateralized loan, and frankly, often it's not worth putting up the money yourself if you can borrow it (at 2%). Then again, a car isn't (really) an asset with a positive RoI..

tell that to the people that own certain porsches. some of those 911's go up in value

Re: Too many people are buying cars using financial products they do not understand

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just bought a car that I could have paid for cash but they offered me zero % financing over three years, with zero down.

When you guys say "cash", do you mean "not credit"? Because my dealership did not seem to appreciate it at all when I gave them 30,000 euros in stacks of 50 euro notes.

Cash management is a PITA. Plus SAR reporting.

Re: Too many people are buying cars using financial products they do not understand

#173
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same thing here in Norway. When I bought my last car, I negotiated the price down quite a bit and got upgrades/winter tires etc for the same price. When all was said and done and he asked how I wanted to finance it, I pulled out my direct debit and he went pale. I had to argue for another half an hour to keep all the negotiated stuff while paying for it outright, it was silly.

That's because their deal was hedging on the additional commission they'd gain from financing. It's rather screwy. Whenever I trade in a car I always negotiate price on the car alone first, then get a trade appraisal (usually have one in hand from Carmax prior) and if they start playing games I walk out. Past two cars, I walked out and got a call within an hour saying come back we'll do the deal.

I did similar with our last Honda. Came to the end and I asked if they would want me to sign an arbitration agreement.

Told them I would, but not for free. A lot of people died for my right to sue them in court. I asked for and received an accessory they sell for $180...

They were confused...

Re: Too many people are buying cars using financial products they do not understand

#174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I've bought mortgages, I was required by law to sign a document that says "I have read and understood these loan documents." I've seen many people in the newspaper complaining that they neither read nor understood the terms. At what point do you expect legally competent adults to pay attention to and take responsibility for what they're doing?

Do you read the terms and conditions pop up that every bit of software seems to contain?

If they cost $50,000, you bet I do. Lesser ones, if I sign my name, I do. Click thru ones on fairly worthless software aren't binding.

Re: Too many people are buying cars using financial products they do not understand

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I've bought mortgages, I was required by law to sign a document that says "I have read and understood these loan documents." I've seen many people in the newspaper complaining that they neither read nor understood the terms. At what point do you expect legally competent adults to pay attention to and take responsibility for what they're doing?

> At what point do you expect legally competent adults to pay attention to and take responsibility for what they're doing? At no point. I don't even consider it a matter of "responsibility". You can only take responsibility when things are clearly laid out. But what about the even more important responsibility to CLEARLY lay things out that should fall into businesses? What I do expect and find important, and should…

> What I do expect and find important, and should be legally binding, is that no business should be allowed to hide the actual impact of purchases behind legalese and long-winded "financial product" descriptions, and then put the blame on the customer for not "reading through it".

And in general, as I pointed out here, such contracts tend to be invalid in court. However, signing a piece of paper in plain english certifying saying "I read it" when one did not ought to mean something.

A legal doctrine where one can not bother reading contracts and yet get them decided in favor of ones imaginary terms doesn't sound like a workable system. The whole point of written contracts is so there's a record of what the terms were and what was agreed upon.

Re: Too many people are buying cars using financial products they do not understand

#176
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No non-lawyer is competent to understand all real estate transaction documents. But they might be competent enough to acquiesce to the grand stupidity of our culture [1] and hire a real estate attorney. Mine reviewed all the relevant documents and come to the closing, for a flat fee that I thought was rather reasonable, in particular compared to the hand cramp I got from all the ridiculous paper work I had to hand si…

> No non-lawyer is competent to understand all real estate transaction documents. I understood them well enough. It isn't that hard. The misunderstandings people would complain about were not about subtleties or legal hare-splitting. It's also established legal doctrine that a contract written in ambiguous, confusing, or tricky language isn't going to hold up in court. Judges take a dim view of that. I also actually…

A house is, for most people, a very large transaction. Saying "it isn't that hard" considering attorney's specialize in real estate is like saying "reading x-rays isn't that hard".

Had I not had an attorney present, it would have taken me all day, instead of 4 hours of reading stuff. It wasn't a matter of confidence in myself, it was a matter of having less than 100% trust in everyone else present.

Re: Too many people are buying cars using financial products they do not understand

#177
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why does buying a car in America involve so much (or even any!) negotiation at all? I guess it's a form of price discrimination? I just tried to figure out (via Google) whether it's common in eg Germany---but what I found what mostly only about negotiations for used cars.

Literally, the only things you negotiate in the US are cars and houses. Not groceries nor clothes nor millions of other things. Perhaps a few minor things here or there.. but we pretty much just stick to the basics.

Healthcare. If you ended up paying from pocket.

Re: Too many people are buying cars using financial products they do not understand

#178
post #42
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I bought a Honda many years ago, they were offering 1% financing. At the same time, Toyota was doing 0% financing. I don't know how they make a profit on it, but why wouldn't you get a 0% finance deal over paying in full? I think the main benefit of paying upfront is to buy a used car.

Yep, my 2012 Civic was bought on 1% financing. Paid off now, still runs great, and I kept the would-be total payment in cash in retirement accounts. Probably could have done better on a used car, but for once I wanted to be the one to run something into the ground. Still waiting on that.

I have a 2003 Pilot with 250k miles. It will die someday, but it's lasted about 5 years longer than I expected it so far!

Re: Too many people are buying cars using financial products they do not understand

#179
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If cost of debt borrow money / finance

There is a lot more to this than a simple equation. Otherwise we would all borrow as much as we could (about 2% and somewhat predictable) and put it all in the stock market (avg 7,5 % but volatile).

You can't get unsecured credit that cheap for very long or in great quantities.

And when people do shit like that with home equity loans, etc, everything works great until it doesn't.

Re: Too many people are buying cars using financial products they do not understand

#180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you read the terms and conditions pop up that every bit of software seems to contain?

If they cost $50,000, you bet I do. Lesser ones, if I sign my name, I do. Click thru ones on fairly worthless software aren't binding.

Look up the names Schwartz and Aurenheimer. They either ignored the click through EULA or deliberately broke it. Charged with CFAA felonies over it. One got prison for many years. The other killed himself to avoid it as well as to protest the insanity of having criminal charges brought against them because they broke the EULA terms on a web site. Both used scripts to cycle through ID numbers in a web page. This is what happens when you don't read. The system is fucked. Better make sure you aren't violating the TOS on any of the web sites you visit.
Post reply on HN