Live data from Hacker News

Safety incidents at Tesla plant were higher than industry average in 2015

latimes.com

61–70 of 112 posts

Re: Safety incidents at Tesla plant were higher than industry average in 2015

#61
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When your job involves pulling down a hanging drill, and the worse injury a person can expect is tennis elbow, that's not too bad. Also, yes, poor people work 12-16 hours a day. It was certainly the case when I worked at a grocery store years ago, at least.

Does that mean it's acceptable?

It means that other types of injuries (death, dismemberment) should be prioritized.

Re: Safety incidents at Tesla plant were higher than industry average in 2015

#62
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This doesn't answer the question.

Doesn't it? If Tesla is about as dangerous as slaughterhouses and sawmills, and Tesla is more dangerous than other automakers, then it follows that other auto makers are less dangerous than slaughterhouses and sawmills.

If A > B and A > C, you still don't know if B > C.

Re: Safety incidents at Tesla plant were higher than industry average in 2015

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Global warming. We're at or past the tipping point already, but electric cars and solar houses are definitely the direction we need to be going if we want to avoid disastrous and irreversible climate change. If-- if --Tesla can help make that happen, it'll be worth a lot of sacrifice.

What caused climate change before there were people?

There's a relevant xkcd about that: https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/1732:_Earth_Tempe...

Re: Safety incidents at Tesla plant were higher than industry average in 2015

#64
post #57
post #52

Shocking revelation reveals that up to half of car makers have below average safety records! Edit - I know safety is a serious matter, but it does look like this is a historical issue that Tesla takes seriously and has under control.

That would be "below _median_ safety records."

Well, yes. The median is an average that always has that property. That's the joke.

Re: Safety incidents at Tesla plant were higher than industry average in 2015

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What, exactly, is "worth it", though? SpaceX, sure, that could be worth it. They're actually innovating. But Tesla? A goddamn car company? What the hell is so important about fancy cars for rich people that they have to screw the workers for? Sure, they call themselves an "energy company", and they have made "amazing advances in energy technology", but both Tesla's fancy solar panel AND battery "advances" are literal…

Global warming. We're at or past the tipping point already, but electric cars and solar houses are definitely the direction we need to be going if we want to avoid disastrous and irreversible climate change. If-- if --Tesla can help make that happen, it'll be worth a lot of sacrifice.

I think it's a mistake to think that a more efficient personal vehicle can make the difference in climate change. The fundamental problem is that personal vehicles are NOT efficient, except on a personal level. A disruption in transportation is needed. Trains that are cheap and easy to install would do it. Something out of left field that hasn't been invented yet could do it. But improving cars can only ever be an incremental change, and we're well past the point where incremental changes can help.

Re: Safety incidents at Tesla plant were higher than industry average in 2015

#66
post #43
post #3

Title here is misleading. Actual title of article at LA Times is "Tesla had worse safety records than slaughterhouses and sawmills" - note "had", past tense. The records in question are from 2015, and as the article says, they are working on improvements.

Ok, we've changed the baity title to representative language from the article, in accordance with https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html . All: let's please have a more substantive discussion now. It's amazing how sensitive these threads are to hot coals in the title.

FWIW, the article is written in a vindictive and personal tone; there's basically no way that's going to generate a balanced discussion about the ethics of workplace risk, or the usefulness of labour statistics.

Re: Safety incidents at Tesla plant were higher than industry average in 2015

#67
post #51
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok, we've changed the baity title to representative language from the article, in accordance with https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html . All: let's please have a more substantive discussion now. It's amazing how sensitive these threads are to hot coals in the title.

I don't think you would get much productive discussion for the article, which makes apples to oranges comparisons, misrepresents the report or focuses on irrelevant details. The report itself is fairly clear and easy to read and probably serves as a much better starting point for a discussion. The report is linked in the article - http://worksafe.typepad.com/files/worksafe_tesla5_24.pdf

Even the report is a bit misleading, comparing Tesla's yearly rates to the same-year averages paints the picture that Tesla got an additional 15% more risky than the industry in one year. About a quarter of the y/y change in the industry average between 2014 and 2015 is apparently residual[0]. There are only three points, but the residuals on the slope of Tesla's TRIR are lower than the residuals on the industry average [1]. What this basically shows us is that Tesla hasn't been a company long enough to establish a trend, upward or downward, of workplace injury. Worksafe Inc.'s report claims that Days Away, Restricted [activity], and Transfer[red] (understandably [given how inconsistent OSHA themselves are about what it stands for] misquoted as Days Away Transfer Rate) is a better indicator of rates of serious injury, but it's obvious to a layperson that days off, even on a 300 form, are discretionary. It could just as easily be the case that Tesla workers are encouraged to take days off for more minor injuries.

[0]: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=linear+regression+of+%5... [1]: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=linear+regression+of+%5...

Re: Safety incidents at Tesla plant were higher than industry average in 2015

#68

>Charley Briese said his job involved pulling down a hanging drill three times a minute for 12 to 16 hours a day, causing severe tendinitis 12-16 hrs a day?

Are there no unions involved?

Or was he making tons of money because of overtime so didn't care until it became a critical health problem?

Sounds like both the employee and the employer were falling down on the job of ensuring safe working practices. Not to mention lax regulation.

Re: Safety incidents at Tesla plant were higher than industry average in 2015

#69
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does that mean it's acceptable?

It means that other types of injuries (death, dismemberment) should be prioritized.

It's often overwork that cause the death and dismemberment.

Re: Safety incidents at Tesla plant were higher than industry average in 2015

#70
The title itself uses a basic framing technique intentionally written to fool you into a false conclusion.

1- "worse than slaughterhouses and sawmills" is more catchy than "better than X" (chose any X automaker) 2- Is the safety level of a slaughterhouses or a sawmill comparable to a car's ? They are things not in the same category, with different sophistication level and different purpose, how many times a day an average person will enter a slaughterhouse or a sawmill ?

Post reply on HN