Live data from Hacker News

China Can’t Sustain Its Debt-Fueled Binge, Moody’s Says

nytimes.com

191–200 of 263 posts

Re: China Can’t Sustain Its Debt-Fueled Binge, Moody’s Says

#191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

and there will need to be a reckoning And yet when I read things like this I also think of the cliché, "Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent." People have been waiting decades for Japan's post-boom day of reckoning and we've not seen it.

Nikkei peaked at 40k in 1990; it has been hovering around 10-20k ever since.

That 40k price was after a huge asset price bubble.

Re: China Can’t Sustain Its Debt-Fueled Binge, Moody’s Says

#192
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where did you get this info? Every source I see shows China's Debt/GDP (42.90%) as much lower than the US (104.17%).

The parent is talking about total debt - public, household, and corporate. China's public debt isn't too much but the corporate debt is what has skyrocketed. Many analysts treat Chinese corporate debt as more-or-less equivalent to public debt (and don't do this for the United States), on the assumption that the government will bail out SOEs rather than allow them to fail and create widespread unemployment. That may o…

>Many analysts treat Chinese corporate debt as more-or-less equivalent to public debt (and don't do this for the United States), on the assumption that the government will bail out SOEs rather than allow them to fail and create widespread unemployment

I'd say this certainly gives a lot of political leeway in China, compared to having the opposite in place. I wonder if all the major US companies that were bailed out, that their debt should be considered public debt seeing there is already a precedent in place. But something tells me I doubt moodys will have a word on that.

Re: China Can’t Sustain Its Debt-Fueled Binge, Moody’s Says

#195
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It sounds more like a parable, not an actual story. The point is that if enough people make prediction, some of them will right over and over and over - even though it's all random.

> a parable Ha, that's a great observation; I hadn't thought of it. On one hand, I'm very uncomfortable with any implied comparison to the most well known practitioner of parables. On the other, many others have used the form. Maybe I'll write all my HN posts in parable form - 'those who have ears to hear' will understand; the others I won't have to deal with. I could use it for business emails too. Coming up with th…

Call it a fable, then.

It's a really effective technique for getting a point across to most people if they'll give you the time to listen and you're a good storyteller. It's a bit less effective in highly nerdy spaces but still worth doing.

Re: China Can’t Sustain Its Debt-Fueled Binge, Moody’s Says

#196
post #30
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you seriously suggesting that US government deficits are run to invest in education and infrastructure? Deficits are mostly attributable to military spending. I'm doubtful that killing people in other countries who present absolutely no threat to you is productivity-enhancing.

GI bill pays for a lot of education

In my opinion, in a modern society education should be free, for everybody, and not influenced by private or religious interests. If a society fails to provide this to their youth, then somebody else will influence the kids, but not necessarily provide education.

It's just my opinion. Otherwise we are back to Middle Age.

Re: China Can’t Sustain Its Debt-Fueled Binge, Moody’s Says

#197
post #97

Ok, this is probably a silly question, but who holds all the debt now? The avg US citizen would say China holds much of the US debt, but now it sounds like China is borrowing their way into trouble too... it's not any of these third world countries... who is it?

The biggest group holding US debt are its citizens. The social security trust fund has been raided for decades by the general fund to spend on defense security state and has not been paid back. Politicians and their funders hope everyone is hoodwinked into forgiving the debt or just taxing everyone more to make up for the stolen^W borrowed money.

> The social security trust fund has been raided for decades by the general fund to spend on defense security state and has not been paid back.

Where is the money in the social security trust fund kept. I had assumed it was in treasury bonds and therefore lent to the US Government general funds to be spent at the will of congress. Is the Social Security Administration actually holding VOO or physical gold?

Re: China Can’t Sustain Its Debt-Fueled Binge, Moody’s Says

#198
post #185
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems like smart people have been predicting that China's growth is unsustainable on a regular basis for at least 15 years... it's tough for an average HNer like myself to take the time to tell which "expert" is just blowing smoke and which expert truly has a handle on the salient facts- Guess all I can really do is simply wait and see who ends up being right...

It's funny because these massive debt accumulations invariably end up either in financial collapses or period of very high inflation, both of which can have dramatic impacts on a large part of the population (particularly savers and pensioners). But they are the most predictable thing in the world. Yet no one seems to be worried about them, whether in Europe or in the US. When the collapse will happen, people will be…

China is a bit more of a complex situation since they are a republic, the citizens have no direct say in government matters. Now of course the Chinese government knows they have to continue providing growth, otherwise citizens will question the system and revolution could happen.

But let's say a majority of voting eligible citizens decided their country needs to dial down debt-fueled growth? Well there's almost nothing they can do, even though popular opinion has changed.

In Greece, even with the fraud that went on voters still had to know bad financial choices were being made. Heck, I live in the U.S. and know when politicians are using financialeering to make the books balance better...

Re: China Can’t Sustain Its Debt-Fueled Binge, Moody’s Says

#199

I think the best model to understand this is Michael Pettis's balance sheet analysis. He covers it extensively, but here's his latest digest of the model: http://carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancialmarkets/66221 It really makes clear how stark the choices are for China. The debt binge of the last ~10 years has masked the flattening out of productive investment, and there will need to be a reckoning. Hopefully it's a…

"To move from the abstract to something specific, I will assume, as occurred in 2009-10 as a consequence of the global crisis, that for reasons external to China there is a sharp contraction in its current account surplus, mainly caused by a sharp fall in exports....." (he then goes on to describe the repercussions that match his model.) Maybe I'm misunderstanding what he's saying, but isn't what he describes true of…

So what you are talking about would amount to a rebalancing of the economy from the SOEs to the private sector. This is something he has written extensively about and that he thinks is necessary for long-term sustainable growth. But something has to be done about the SEOs, and right now they are kept afloat by a transfer in the OTHER direction. That is, the resources spent on their debt is cannibalizing growth in other areas.

Re: China Can’t Sustain Its Debt-Fueled Binge, Moody’s Says

#200
post #63

Moody's? Is that the same credit rating agency which intentionally inflated credit rating for risky mortgage investment and eventually fined almost $1b[1]? It is just so funny that an agency that has already destroyed its own creditability is still running around and doing credit rating for others. [1] http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-14/moodys-agrees-settleme...

I think the only credible credit rating agency is Standard and Poor's. It'll be interesting to see how they react to this downgrade by Moody's.

S&P is arguably worse - S&P was fined $1.5B for its shameful role before GFC, it refused to downgrade problematic assets because their business revenue relies on all those junk assets being rated AAA[1].

[1] http://www.bbc.com/news/business-31115174

Should I trust what S&P is saying given their track records like this?

Post reply on HN