Live data from Hacker News

My Family’s Slave

theatlantic.com

321–330 of 645 posts

Re: My Family’s Slave

#321

I visited Hong Kong a year ago. It is famous for its night markets, its abundant partying, and the massive financial powerhouses that make their home here. I did all the tourist things, I partied, I explored, it was great. A couchsurfing host showed me around the city on a tram. She pointed out masses of ladies in plain clothing sitting around on the sidewalks and in streets. It was a Sunday. This was the "maids day"…

They aren't permitted to go back home and sleep on the weekends? Why not?

Re: My Family’s Slave

#322

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Certainly one could question to what extent wage earners are truly "free" given the need to continue to perform wage labor to survive.

Thereby the term "wage slavery".

Yeah, but that one's been repeated so often people just tune it out.

Re: My Family’s Slave

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Women actually control the majority of discretionary spending, and not because they make more money. The fact that there is no contract does not mean the work is not compensated.

Marriage is a conteact, and usually entitles you to 50% equity.

Did you forget the /sarcasm tag, because history shows otherwise.

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you forgot that intent doesn't convey well through forum posts.

Re: My Family’s Slave

#324
post #65
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand your reasoning and try acting decently (even though I probably fail often). Of course it is easier to point out mistakes instead of changing oneself to the better. I think it is commendable that you were so open about your thoughts, which empowered a stranger like me to take a moral shit on your behavior in this specific situation. I have some acquaintances with weird/antisocial/borderline illegal behavi…

I've had some acquaintances do some weird, antisocial, definitely illegal things. I can't recall a time when an acquaintance has done something that appears as evil as the situation we're discussing. Best case interpretation that I can make, ignoring the floor mat. They were micromanaging when their employee wakes up despite their daily responsibilities being temporarily reduced (home owners were away). If I had a fr…

> If I had a friend doing even the above, I'd at LEAST ask "explain to me how this isn't you being a dick."

Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but it sounds like the "master of the house" (the one calling in the morning) wasn't the friend, but the friend's father?

Re: My Family’s Slave

#325
post #324
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've had some acquaintances do some weird, antisocial, definitely illegal things. I can't recall a time when an acquaintance has done something that appears as evil as the situation we're discussing. Best case interpretation that I can make, ignoring the floor mat. They were micromanaging when their employee wakes up despite their daily responsibilities being temporarily reduced (home owners were away). If I had a fr…

> If I had a friend doing even the above, I'd at LEAST ask "explain to me how this isn't you being a dick." Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but it sounds like the "master of the house" (the one calling in the morning) wasn't the friend, but the friend's father?

You might be right. If that's the case, I offer this errata: "Explain to me how this isn't your father being a dick."

Re: My Family’s Slave

#326
post #297
post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, her name wasn't actually Lola. It was Eudocia Tomas Pulido. Lola was literally her slave name. There's a lot to talk about in the article, and I'm not super-excited about digging deep into that here on hn, but I think it's worthwhile to point out her real name.

"Lola" was not her "slave name." "Lola" is an affectionate nickname that means "grandma" in Filipino.

"Lola" was the name her owners called her. Affectionate is a complicated word here, considering that affection didn't change the fact that a woman was held in servitude to the Tizon family. The least we can do in this situation is try to stop erasing her real name.

Re: My Family’s Slave

#327
post #295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's because women's lib effectively doubled the labor force, halving wages. Now only the top 3% can afford a house-spouse.

You might look into the insane stuff that has happened to housing. That is possibly a better explanation for why it now takes two incomes to try to keep a roof over our heads.

I hear repeatedly that "real wages have been constant since 1970". What started happening around then? Labor follows the same supply demand curves as any other commodity.

Re: My Family’s Slave

#328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

we could as a society pay (women) people for emotional labor and for taking care of children and elderly. we could choose to economically value teachers and nurses instead of economically devaluing "feminine" roles -- and creating economic value specifically for masculine-branded roles. (those moments when piloting and programming became branded and $$ as male professions) in order to end professional segregation, we…

>we could as a society pay (women) people for emotional labor They already get paid for emotional labor with emotional reward. >we could choose to economically value teachers and nurses instead of economically devaluing "feminine" roles Maybe you could stop being sexist and calling things like education and nursing "feminine." >in order to end professional segregation If you can point out actual instances of sexism i…

> They already get paid for emotional labor with emotional reward.

Great, so they can just pay the rent with emotional reward then.

> Maybe you could stop being sexist and calling things like education and nursing "feminine."

Clearly these occupations have a larger percentage than average of female workers, they're associated with women, and probably not coincidentally, they also have low pay and low prestige. I don't know why it's the "enlightened" move to stick your fingers in your ears and pretend that's not the case.

Re: My Family’s Slave

#329
post #5

A well written story. I'd be interested in hearing from any Filipino commentators how common this practice still is/is perceived to be in the Philippines today. It's ranked 33/167 by Global Slavery Index[0] as compared to the US at #52. [0] https://www.globalslaveryindex.org/country/philippines/

It was common among my (upper-class) extended family, but (disclaimer) I only ever visited every year or so until I was 15.

A lot needs to be done in terms of triangulating proper compensation and upping respect for some families, but I think people also need to maybe visit the Philippines.

That's not to say I didn't find it weird, I totally did. They were privy to such intimate aspects of our lives, but sitting in the car next to them was weird, and they wouldn't really be "allowed" to eat with us (although my mother, around Alex's age, was fine with them eating with us). It was unsettling to me even as a young kid. It was like they were these pariahs and I didn't exactly know why and couldn't really ask why, but they were so present in the day to day that they would know when I cried over something stupid or if I had a period stain I had trouble washing out.

But, I think it's also good to have some frame of reference. Again, proper compensation and respect are essential. But also realise that it's a country trying to grow it's middle class and that there's no way to go from point A to point B in the major metropolitan area without seeing children digging through trash, shanty-towns that may or may not wear the next rainy flood, etc. In these situations, proper compensation for a live-in helper to a middle class family maybe (I wouldn't know) is the stability of room and board and food, even if that means sleeping on a futon with the other live-in workers (who do different roles) in a tiny spare room.

My philosophy tends to be that if you can reasonably afford to give them better standards, then do so. So if you're a foreigner, give them that extra $20 because they will certainly appreciate the exchange rate. If you're well-to-do and regularly have live-in help, having proper "maids quarters" and cots can't be too much of an ask over time.

Re: My Family’s Slave

#330
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What's your humane socialist alternative? Collectivising the children and raising them in a commune? This was tried in the kibbutz and is almost unanimous that it failed completely.

I'm aware of that. People often make indirect little attacks against capitalism here as some kind of socialist dog whistle. I want to call them out, and asking what concrete things they propose. Anything they can put to words has likely already been tried and ended in disaster - people advocating for misery need to be exposed for what they are.

Is there argument here that literally nothing whatsoever could be better than the system we currently live under? The one where we're hurtling toward ecological catastrophe and essentially no mitigation is being done?
Post reply on HN