Greenspun: Let's stop investing in our kids
blogs.law.harvard.edu
Greenspun: Let's stop investing in our kids
1–10 of 79 posts
Re: Greenspun: Let's stop investing in our kids
#2Re: Greenspun: Let's stop investing in our kids
#3Read the article. Visited link to Wikipedia article? Daymit, how you can SURVIVE on 35K a year in USA??? Maybe somewhere in Mississippi, but not in North USA. Still, you'll have to eat random crap from 7-11 and macdonalds...
Re: Greenspun: Let's stop investing in our kids
#4Re: Greenspun: Let's stop investing in our kids
#5I can't take an article seriously that claims we'd be better off without doctors and hospitals. Whatever fallacy that's called, I'm definitely guilty.
It says that we're paying too much for the service we get in return.
Re: Greenspun: Let's stop investing in our kids
#6I can't take an article seriously that claims we'd be better off without doctors and hospitals. Whatever fallacy that's called, I'm definitely guilty.
That's not quite what it says. It says that we're paying too much for the service we get in return.
This is what it says.
Re: Greenspun: Let's stop investing in our kids
#7Re: Greenspun: Let's stop investing in our kids
#8I can't take an article seriously that claims we'd be better off without doctors and hospitals. Whatever fallacy that's called, I'm definitely guilty.
More generally: "For the amount of money that we are putting into , we should be getting more value out of it."
Re: Greenspun: Let's stop investing in our kids
#9I can't take an article seriously that claims we'd be better off without doctors and hospitals. Whatever fallacy that's called, I'm definitely guilty.
He's showing that things are screwed up. We're spending too much on education for what we are getting in return. He's claiming that the system is wholly inefficient. He's just extending that to the health care system in that one-liner. More generally: "For the amount of money that we are putting into , we should be getting more value out of it."
Re: Greenspun: Let's stop investing in our kids
#10Read the article. Visited link to Wikipedia article? Daymit, how you can SURVIVE on 35K a year in USA??? Maybe somewhere in Mississippi, but not in North USA. Still, you'll have to eat random crap from 7-11 and macdonalds...
I and many of my friends survive on less than 10K in the USA. Even Derek Sivers (from Mixergy interview) claims to live on 20K or less.
[Note: I realize that electricity and Internet are not necessary to survive, but the person claiming to survive on $20K/year obviously has both.]
[Aside: I hope that the answer doesn't come down to something stupid like, "I invested $1-million in making my house/property as self-sufficient as possible." That kinda excludes a good portion of the population from trying.]