Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Self Hosted vs. Gmail / Outlook?

news.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 66 posts

Re: Ask HN: Self Hosted vs. Gmail / Outlook?

#41
I have been setting up mailservers since the '90s when you still had to deal with sendmail's configuration format. I've used most email servers available on unix platforms. And I'm also someone who wants to do everything myself and not depend on anybody else if I don't have to. Still, and it hurts me to say this, it might simply not be worth your time. I use a paid service for my main mailbox now.

I have a mailserver handling some personal email, but I feel it's too risky (to take the responsibility) and too much effort to host email accounts for just a few other people. You can and probably will be every once in a while blacklisted by one of the big providers or have legitimate email bounce, even if you have SPF, DKIM, TLS and your own spam filters set up. You also have to keep an eye on your servers to see if no new filth gets through. And you'd probably want to keep a backup relay ready. You have to provide ways for the users to configure or fine-tune their individual spam settings and mark messages. You most likely want to install a web interface next to the IMAP and/or POP service, which opens another can of worms.

I feel I'm too old now – meaning I have so many other responsibilities – that I don't want to babysit something that is after all rather crucial and should "just work". If you have the energy and time, please go for it, otherwise just search for a reliable paid service.

Note that assuming privacy when talking about email, even though most protocol interactions might be encrypted these days, is in my opinion somewhat misguided. Don't use email if it's truly private. Or use end-to-end encryption, such as PGP.

There might be a hole in the market for a company that helps geeks host reliable email servers, for those that want more control than just an IMAP account with sieve support, but maybe the margins are too low and fighting spamming subscribers too hard.

Re: Ask HN: Self Hosted vs. Gmail / Outlook?

#42
post #16

Setting up your own email server will bring you into the wonderful world of big email corporations not delivering your emails until you subscribe to their whitelist with, for some of them, subscription fee. Back in the time, I had this problem with sending emails from my private server to yahoo or microsoft (hotmail, live.com, etc...), both refusing to deliver my emails to their clients as I could be a potential evil…

I've been running my own mail servers for quite a while and I can assure that this is total nonsense. No large email host charges a fee for mail delivery. There are some rogue antispam solutions that do so, but they are rare and only used by shady small email providers. There's even an RFC stating that charging for blacklist removal is forbidden.

You will sometimes have delivery problems, although the problem is much smaller than often painted. But they can usually be avoided if you don't send spam (many people send spam but like to call it differently - your newsletter you subscribe people that haven't asked for it is spam) and if you properly react to error messages and abuse reports.

Re: Ask HN: Self Hosted vs. Gmail / Outlook?

#43
I chose Google GSuite to avoid non-delivery of emails which was happening when I was still on self-hosting. Most emails I send used to be marked as spam and blocked. Not anymore. Fee I pay every month is very low compared to the time I used to spend managing my own servers.

Re: Ask HN: Self Hosted vs. Gmail / Outlook?

#45
post #29

If you care about privacy _and_ freedom, check out Kolab Now. https://kolabnow.com/

That's what I use. Works great and I've only ever had a few hours of service interruption.

One alternative I would suggest to people trying to decide between self hosted or hosted email is to consider a hybrid. Host your own inbound SMTP, but use a service for outbound, e.g. Mailgun. The hardest part of running a mail server today, is getting your email accepted by the receiving SMTP server.

Re: Ask HN: Self Hosted vs. Gmail / Outlook?

#46
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is Germany any better?

Hier privacy is like a king. Everyone must ask permission to access any data, otherwise a legal hell will unleash.

Judging by the country's past practices and the prevalent culture of "I value my privacy, yet want to know everything about you" I'd rather have the Americans or the Russians reading my mail.

Re: Ask HN: Self Hosted vs. Gmail / Outlook?

#47
I run Postfix & Dovecot (with SPF, DKIM, DMARC, DNSSEC, TLS) from my home network with a remote backup just in case it goes down, as well as my own DNS servers.

I had to ask my ISP to disable some rules on their end and pay a fee to have a static IP address, but overall it was pretty painless. Though I can imagine some providers being much worse.

After the initial hurdle of setting everything up in my experience everything went mostly fine. I had to whitelist my domain on Microsoft's site, but Gmail and Yahoo worked fine from the start. I haven't had a problem since. My university teachers receive my email just fine, so did my co-workers before I was given a corporate email address.

Is it worth it? Maybe not. It was more of a learning experience for me, but I find it works just as well as any other provider I've used. At least for now.

As others have said there are lots of outdated guides. I found the Archlinux Wiki and the manpages to be the most useful resources. Also please stay up to date on the software.

Re: Ask HN: Self Hosted vs. Gmail / Outlook?

#48
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hier privacy is like a king. Everyone must ask permission to access any data, otherwise a legal hell will unleash.

Simply not true. Telekom gives your data on a plate to whichever agency wants to access it. To the point that an NSA watch post is 5 minutes away from the Telekom headquarters in Darmstadt.

Not anymore. Yes, they used to, but since some incidents with NSA spying Merkel&Co, they closed all such collaboration programs. Now they are building something like a closed garden, where only german interests have access.

If this is tamper and intrusion proof, this is other story.

Re: Ask HN: Self Hosted vs. Gmail / Outlook?

#50
post #6
post #5

Use a paid service. I use Fastmail. It baffles me every day, how HN is obsessed with Gmail as if there was no alternative and are willing to trade a minor improvement in comfort over having every email read, analyzed, indexed, profiled and put into the Ad machine. I'm also surprised that so many people use the web client and not a native client with IMAP.

What are you talking about? HN is full of people pushing Fastmail over Gmail.

I'm talking about the number of stories about Gmail and their respective upvotes: https://hn.algolia.com/?query=gmail&sort=byPopularity&prefix...

Gmail is popular on HN, and probably more popular than all other alternatives.

Post reply on HN