Here's a video demo of OpenShift.io by Red Hat:
Red Hat OpenShift.io – Free, end-to-end, cloud-native development
101–110 of 124 posts
Re: Red Hat OpenShift.io – Free, end-to-end, cloud-native development
#102It's Redhat, whose focus has always been enterprise the money maker. Ever since it dumped the desktop years ago, I switched to the deb ecosystem and never looked back, do not want to have anything to do with Redhat,including this openshift thing, one reason is for the "dump-the-desktop"(please don't mention Fedora), another is that, DEB is so much better than RPM for my daily life. I also hate the Redhat-intrusively-…
By the way, my 2017 wildest forecast: Microsoft may acquire Redhat
2017 forecast... Microsoft acquires Canonical.
Re: Red Hat OpenShift.io – Free, end-to-end, cloud-native development
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
By the way, my 2017 wildest forecast: Microsoft may acquire Redhat
There is more chance of the pope converting to Islam, then MS acquiring Red Hat. That is one acquisition that would turn to shit over night, and MS would be left with just some logos, as the companies main assets (its engineering) would all walk out the door, followed by customers not renewing subscriptions.
It's 2017. Pope converted to Islam and Trump got elected. Didn't you hear?
Re: Red Hat OpenShift.io – Free, end-to-end, cloud-native development
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
By the way, my 2017 wildest forecast: Microsoft may acquire Redhat
Red Hat is to some extent protected from acquisition by the ideological poison pill. Because there's no IP (open source), the value of the company is basically the engineering talent, which enables the level of service Red Hat provides. Many of those engineers have very strong opinions about FOSS. The second a Microsoft (or worse, an Oracle) tried to acquire Red Hat, a huge portion of that talent would walk out the d…
No, the value of RH is in the clients they have, just like every enterprise software company ever.
Oracle is notorious for buying companies for their clients, even if everyone quits (eg, hostile takeover of Sieble)
Re: Red Hat OpenShift.io – Free, end-to-end, cloud-native development
#105I wonder if there's a name for this: that impatience and discomfort you feel about anything new until you understand what it is exactly and what to compare it to. Until that question is answered, you have ZERO patience for any marketing you read: especially fluffy visionary commentary about "digital transformation". You are quite literally making your readers angry because you are not answering their questions. For a…
You seem like one of those guys who simply can't appreciate a vertically integrated, synergistic solution that delivers on the promise of strategic technical innovation with seamless delivery.
Re: Red Hat OpenShift.io – Free, end-to-end, cloud-native development
#106Re: Red Hat OpenShift.io – Free, end-to-end, cloud-native development
#107Re: Red Hat OpenShift.io – Free, end-to-end, cloud-native development
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's an abuse prevention mechanism. We do not permit users to have multiple OpenShift Online accounts. See 2.1 in the OpenShift Online terms of service: https://www.openshift.com/legal/terms.html "You may not (or permit third parties to) create multiple accounts or otherwise access the Services in a manner that is intended to avoid Fees or to circumvent maximum capacity thresholds for the Services."
Then it's a bug right? The uniqueness check should be based on the part before the + sign.
No, I don't think what google does is standard behavior (not trying to say anything bad about Google; I love Google). However, as far as I know, disallowing + is not a particularly good way of preventing abuse. I won't go as far as to say it semms like bad code but it is pretty close.
I think it is OK to make a special case for Gmail and Google mail but it is counterproductive to try to crown it as a de facto standard.
http://mozilla.wikia.com/wiki/User:Me_at_work/plushaters?use...
Re: Red Hat OpenShift.io – Free, end-to-end, cloud-native development
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then they should have announced it when it was ready. There is now openshift.com (enterprise), openshift.org (OSS), and openshift.io (???) and none of these websites do a great job of explaining why you should be on that website and not the others.
You want everything explained, you want to use it for free and you don't want to participate. Everything that's wrong with the world ;-)
Don't be silly.
If you want customers, you have to actually convince them to try your product.
The expectation of a customer that they might want to understand what the heck they're signing up for... before they sign up for it is hardly controversial.
I think this thread makes it abundantly clear that a days work creating some screen casts instead of fluffing out some marketing fairyfloss would have significantly improved the reception of this product.
It's just plain marketing fail.
Re: Red Hat OpenShift.io – Free, end-to-end, cloud-native development
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
> 2. Show photos, video, or screenshots. You'll literally be able to demo it yourself for free, on demand, in production (IF YOU DARE!), within the next few days.
There is video link in this blog post: https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2017/05/02/announcing-red...
I was expecting to find a video in the link you pasted, almost missed it. Here's the actual link to the video
https://vimeo.com/215402513/02867b4aea