Earlier quoted context omitted.
A public company generally cares about quarterly performance. A private company might have its sights as far as a few years out. However, with education it takes about 20 years to start seeing a return on investment. It just doesn't make sense to approach education from a business standpoint, both because the ROI is very low, and you need to have stability in education, you can't have someone like ITT Tech all of a s…
If you really believe this why don't you short-sell a bunch of companies and make a killing?
Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US
111–120 of 273 posts
Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US
#112I have found this website very helpful in the past few years when researching government financial info: http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/total_spending_chart I reached out to the website developer/maintainer/creator, Chris Chantrill, telling him I appreciated his work on the site and asking if he needed help (seems like a 1 man operation?) - here's how he responded: Thanks! I started the site in 2007 when "I coul…
Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US
#113Our startup is trying open the information on government spending to the masses:
Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US
#114I really never liked Ballmer, but I did love him for the Developers dance, and now, well, this is awesome. I hope he does it in a long-term sustainable way.
Funny and satirical as it is, [1] completely changed my opinion of Steve Ballmer for the positive. > Steve Ballmer. You open the door to his enormous grinning face, and before you know it he’s in the hall handing over a bottle of something cheap (but with such confidence you don’t notice) and he’s giving you the handshake of your life. Then he’s in. Loving it. Loving the music. Loving the food and drink. He’s going u…
Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
Funny and satirical as it is, [1] completely changed my opinion of Steve Ballmer for the positive. > Steve Ballmer. You open the door to his enormous grinning face, and before you know it he’s in the hall handing over a bottle of something cheap (but with such confidence you don’t notice) and he’s giving you the handshake of your life. Then he’s in. Loving it. Loving the music. Loving the food and drink. He’s going u…
One thing that gets wrong is calling Gates the genius. Ballmer is the smarter of the two.
Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
> federal, state, and local levels (don't forget the counties!) The reason that cannot work is that when you get below the state level, you're dealing with governments that might or might not have enough money and motivation to do proper accounting, staffed by people who might or might not have actually gone to college. Mandating they contribute to the "national spreadsheet" would represent an unprecedented impositio…
If they can't track their basic budget how can they be fiscally responsible? Small govt's don't have the luxury of just printing more money.
Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US
#117Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
I took it to mean "third parties politicize CBO reports" rather than "CBO reports are created with ideological slants," because, well, that's the truth of the matter. You can't criticize a CBO forecast for being slightly inaccurate when politicians decide to change the parameters after the fact.
I think you're correct, but it was poorly worded
Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US
#119> “How many people work for government in the United States?” he asked, with the excitement of a child showing off a new toy, before displaying the answer. “Almost 24 million." Directly, sure. Indirectly, a lot more. By indirectly, I mean companies that do government contract work.
If you go by that approach then everyone in the society indirectly works for the govt in some way or the other.
what is the purpose of taxes? to create unemployment:
Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US
#120Today I filed my tax return showing all the money that came in and every minute expense required to make that money. Why can't we hold the government to the same standard? There should be one (huge) annual spreadsheet published showing how much money came in (federal, state, and local levels), with a detailed accounting of where every penny went, just like I am required to do for my business to claim deductions.
> federal, state, and local levels (don't forget the counties!) The reason that cannot work is that when you get below the state level, you're dealing with governments that might or might not have enough money and motivation to do proper accounting, staffed by people who might or might not have actually gone to college. Mandating they contribute to the "national spreadsheet" would represent an unprecedented impositio…
But they're still required to file everything properly, no matter how complex their personal/business taxes get.