Live data from Hacker News

Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US

nytimes.com

111–120 of 273 posts

Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A public company generally cares about quarterly performance. A private company might have its sights as far as a few years out. However, with education it takes about 20 years to start seeing a return on investment. It just doesn't make sense to approach education from a business standpoint, both because the ROI is very low, and you need to have stability in education, you can't have someone like ITT Tech all of a s…

If you really believe this why don't you short-sell a bunch of companies and make a killing?

Because the belief has nothing to do with your arbitrary test. And even if it did, the market can remain irrational longer than you can stay solvent.

Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US

#112

I have found this website very helpful in the past few years when researching government financial info: http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/total_spending_chart I reached out to the website developer/maintainer/creator, Chris Chantrill, telling him I appreciated his work on the site and asking if he needed help (seems like a 1 man operation?) - here's how he responded: Thanks! I started the site in 2007 when "I coul…

Can't believe I'm posting something positive about the Irish government but they recently launched this site which is actually pretty decent. Pity other governments don't do the same. http://whereyourmoneygoes.gov.ie

Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US

#114
post #16
post #4

I really never liked Ballmer, but I did love him for the Developers dance, and now, well, this is awesome. I hope he does it in a long-term sustainable way.

Funny and satirical as it is, [1] completely changed my opinion of Steve Ballmer for the positive. > Steve Ballmer. You open the door to his enormous grinning face, and before you know it he’s in the hall handing over a bottle of something cheap (but with such confidence you don’t notice) and he’s giving you the handshake of your life. Then he’s in. Loving it. Loving the music. Loving the food and drink. He’s going u…

"non genius" seems like a funny way to describe a person who outperformed gates on the putnam

Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US

#115
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Funny and satirical as it is, [1] completely changed my opinion of Steve Ballmer for the positive. > Steve Ballmer. You open the door to his enormous grinning face, and before you know it he’s in the hall handing over a bottle of something cheap (but with such confidence you don’t notice) and he’s giving you the handshake of your life. Then he’s in. Loving it. Loving the music. Loving the food and drink. He’s going u…

One thing that gets wrong is calling Gates the genius. Ballmer is the smarter of the two.

Then why did Microsoft stagnate under his leadership, once Gates left?

Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> federal, state, and local levels (don't forget the counties!) The reason that cannot work is that when you get below the state level, you're dealing with governments that might or might not have enough money and motivation to do proper accounting, staffed by people who might or might not have actually gone to college. Mandating they contribute to the "national spreadsheet" would represent an unprecedented impositio…

If they can't track their basic budget how can they be fiscally responsible? Small govt's don't have the luxury of just printing more money.

Do you believe all local governments are fiscally responsible?

Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US

#117
post #77

And in related news, Trump killed open.gov today. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170414/13382037153/trump...

And he wonders why people are increasingly skeptical of his administration.

Increasingly? Weren't most of his supporters somewhat skeptical from the start?

Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I took it to mean "third parties politicize CBO reports" rather than "CBO reports are created with ideological slants," because, well, that's the truth of the matter. You can't criticize a CBO forecast for being slightly inaccurate when politicians decide to change the parameters after the fact.

I think you're correct, but it was poorly worded

Sorry about that, GP is correct with regard to my intent.

Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US

#119

> “How many people work for government in the United States?” he asked, with the excitement of a child showing off a new toy, before displaying the answer. “Almost 24 million." Directly, sure. Indirectly, a lot more. By indirectly, I mean companies that do government contract work.

If you go by that approach then everyone in the society indirectly works for the govt in some way or the other.

correct! if you are paid in dollars, you are indirectly working for the government.

what is the purpose of taxes? to create unemployment:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1uWVj0YJ3M

Re: Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spending in the US

#120

Today I filed my tax return showing all the money that came in and every minute expense required to make that money. Why can't we hold the government to the same standard? There should be one (huge) annual spreadsheet published showing how much money came in (federal, state, and local levels), with a detailed accounting of where every penny went, just like I am required to do for my business to claim deductions.

> federal, state, and local levels (don't forget the counties!) The reason that cannot work is that when you get below the state level, you're dealing with governments that might or might not have enough money and motivation to do proper accounting, staffed by people who might or might not have actually gone to college. Mandating they contribute to the "national spreadsheet" would represent an unprecedented impositio…

At the individual & small business tax filing level, you're also dealing with people who might not have money or motivation to do proper accounting, who might not have actually gone to college.

But they're still required to file everything properly, no matter how complex their personal/business taxes get.

Post reply on HN