The Future of UI
11–20 of 91 posts
Re: The Future of UI
#12Sure, it looks cool, but it appears to require a lot of slow and inefficient physical movement to accomplish the most basic of tasks. Imagine a bunch of cubical works sitting at their desktops waving their arms around trying to navigate their computer's file system :-)
In the real world the movements might be much more subtle. Certainly no broader than, say, American Sign Language, which is quite analogous to what we are reinventing here.
Re: The Future of UI
#13I saw similar demo from Microsoft Surface and MIT Sixth Sense
The thrilling potential of SixthSense technology: http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/pranav_mistry_the_thrillin... I haven't seen the one by Microsoft. I really recommend watching this, it's pretty intense.
Re: The Future of UI
#14I saw similar demo from Microsoft Surface and MIT Sixth Sense
The thrilling potential of SixthSense technology: http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/pranav_mistry_the_thrillin... I haven't seen the one by Microsoft. I really recommend watching this, it's pretty intense.
Re: The Future of UI
#15The mouse is movement and control, the gestures need you to hold your hands in strange positions and move within a field of view (what the camera can see). An improved design will need to be intuitive.
Re: The Future of UI
#16One of the most popular demonstrations is browsing through a bunch of photos on a huge screen with large gestures. While this looks quite impressive it's inaccurate when performing specific tasks (e.g. the color-selection planes in the video), the gestures are limited and you have to learn somewhat unintuitive ones apart from the more obvious "select", "move left" and "zoom" gestures. His more real world example (the table and the globe) didn't quite work, but what he could show us wasn't a step up from using a mouse.
An other favorite is the "physical elements on a table" example. This works reasonable well but his examples again were not convincing. Using it as a wind tunnel without being able to rotate it in three dimensions? Calculating the shadows of buildings?
But what's holding us back? Processing power? Cost? Hardware requirements? Or a general lack of use cases, of areas where this really makes sense?
Re: The Future of UI
#17free shipping competitive price any size available they do wholesale and retail! All are extremely CHEAP: http://wowcool.org their products: jordan air max oakland raiders. Ed Hardy AF JUICY POLO Bikini. Christan Audigier BIKINI JACKET. gstar coogi evisu true jeans. coach chanel gucci LV handbags. coogi DG edhardy gucci t-shirts. CA edhardy vests.paul smith shoes. jordan dunk af1 max gucci shoes. EDhardy gucci ny New Era cap. coach okely Adidas CHANEL DG Sunglass. Worthy of my recommendation, go and see: http://wowcool.org
Re: The Future of UI
#18I saw similar demo from Microsoft Surface and MIT Sixth Sense
The thrilling potential of SixthSense technology: http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/pranav_mistry_the_thrillin... I haven't seen the one by Microsoft. I really recommend watching this, it's pretty intense.
Re: The Future of UI
#19I love that, and I totally agree. I think what we're going to see in the future is applications that primarily use the interfaces they're best suited for with fallbacks to other less well-suited interfaces.
Is this going to be the future for every application? No way. The same way touch-based interfaces aren't the future for every application. But (as with any demo) he's only scratching the surface here and I believe that a UI which matches the way we already think about things has some huge implications.
Re: The Future of UI
#20Sure, it looks cool, but it appears to require a lot of slow and inefficient physical movement to accomplish the most basic of tasks. Imagine a bunch of cubical works sitting at their desktops waving their arms around trying to navigate their computer's file system :-)