It could even offer suggestions like "Spend $200 more and recover on a island paradise!"
If globalism is good for low wage workers it certainly should be good for the medical profession.
101–110 of 139 posts
It could even offer suggestions like "Spend $200 more and recover on a island paradise!"
If globalism is good for low wage workers it certainly should be good for the medical profession.
While it isn't my research project, I've been trying to use computer vision and some naive AI to identify early breast cancer lesions in images from mouse tissue with mixed success, but it's something that can be very much accelerated with a large human dataset with outcomes.
(If you work in the field and what to help/hire me with/for something like this, kindly send a message to hn AT naj-p.com)
There are understandably some ethical guidelines that need to be worked for this sort of thing, but seeing as their are public repositories of not-so-dissimilar information (e.g. mammograms), it should be workable.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> everything that can allow an app to give you a first diagnose before heading to the doctor. Why do you want to have the diagnosis before seeing a physician? (I'm legitimately interested in the answer.) In my experience, it's about 50-50 with helping versus hurting making the correct diagnosis and providing accurate treatment.
Seeing a doctor can be expensive and inconvenient (another form of expensive).
Even in the US where you actually have to pay for medical stuff, it can't be more than $10 or so for a quick consultation?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seeing a doctor can be expensive and inconvenient (another form of expensive).
I can understand inconvenient, but expensive? Even in the US where you actually have to pay for medical stuff, it can't be more than $10 or so for a quick consultation?
(Breast) Cancer biopsies, with histology and outcome reports. While it isn't my research project, I've been trying to use computer vision and some naive AI to identify early breast cancer lesions in images from mouse tissue with mixed success, but it's something that can be very much accelerated with a large human dataset with outcomes. (If you work in the field and what to help/hire me with/for something like this,…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
One potential problem with this - the question of liability, and who is responsible for diagnostic accuracy? In this case, for some "Lab on a Chip" device providing a patient directly with diagnostic information without the vetting of a human doctor, liability would sit with the company. IBM's Watson at MD Anderson Cancer center did not work out real well for them. In other words, using AI in the realm of medical dia…
This seems like an easy question to answer. The liability lies with the user until they seek the professional advice of a doctor. Say a user decides to self-diagnose and damages themselves (either through inaction or self-medication or whatever). What difference does it make whether they diagnosed themselves by browsing symptoms on wikipedia or using an advanced diagnosis AI on their phone?
(Breast) Cancer biopsies, with histology and outcome reports. While it isn't my research project, I've been trying to use computer vision and some naive AI to identify early breast cancer lesions in images from mouse tissue with mixed success, but it's something that can be very much accelerated with a large human dataset with outcomes. (If you work in the field and what to help/hire me with/for something like this,…
You're probably aware, but CAD is a staple of modern mammo interpretation workflows. Products like Hologic ImageChecker CAD.
Mammogram analysis is an essential first-line, but I think doctors need better insight in treatment options and finer stratification. An early Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia, for example, is usually treated as pre-pre-cancer, but we might be able to identify a subtype of these lesions that progress on to more aggressive stages.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seeing a doctor can be expensive and inconvenient (another form of expensive).
I can understand inconvenient, but expensive? Even in the US where you actually have to pay for medical stuff, it can't be more than $10 or so for a quick consultation?
Health and doctor visit information which has been cross-correlated with food purchases and exercise type and frequency. Right now we have no way of determining which interactions lead to which conditions, so we generalise based on the 3 inputs independently, when in reality it is perfectly normal to eat more when doing lots of exercise, or need doctor visits when doing exercise with inadequate nutrition.
With that info we can start doing "personalized nutrition" such as (totally made up): "If you have a Diabetes, then you should eat more Broccoli and Radishes because they have nutrients that mediate sugar uptake"