Live data from Hacker News

Fedora dev: “HN feedback on what they want from their Desktop – We got it”

blogs.gnome.org

81–90 of 155 posts

Re: Fedora dev: “HN feedback on what they want from their Desktop – We got it”

#81

My advice: Instead of supporting a bunch of hardware poorly make one laptop like the macbook pro with: * 2 ram slots * 2 M.2 SSD slots * a decent kb * a decent touchpad * a decent screen * discrete graphics * good battery management (you can do this because it's only one) * thunderbolt 3 * at least 3 usb ports * no dvd * ONE TRRS audio port * ethernet * HDMI for legacy reasons forget about * thinnest * lightest * or…

Im very happy with Linux Mint 18 on my MacBook Air (2013model). The best hardware and Mint made possible using rEFInd boot manager. Everything 'just works'.

Re: Fedora dev: “HN feedback on what they want from their Desktop – We got it”

#82

I'm using Fedora again as my desktop after some years on OS X. Things that I'd like to see: * A better email app. Currently none can be said to work very well. I'm actually considering mutt at this point * A better Gnome Calendar. I think this is coming in the next release. * A PDF viewer that supports highlighting.

Email app - have a look at Geary. Simple, looks good, works.

Re: Fedora dev: “HN feedback on what they want from their Desktop – We got it”

#83

My advice: Instead of supporting a bunch of hardware poorly make one laptop like the macbook pro with: * 2 ram slots * 2 M.2 SSD slots * a decent kb * a decent touchpad * a decent screen * discrete graphics * good battery management (you can do this because it's only one) * thunderbolt 3 * at least 3 usb ports * no dvd * ONE TRRS audio port * ethernet * HDMI for legacy reasons forget about * thinnest * lightest * or…

Soon https://system76.com/laptops/galago

Re: Fedora dev: “HN feedback on what they want from their Desktop – We got it”

#84
Amazing response. In the Ubuntu thread many people argued as if the issue were Linux. me and I assume others as well are tired from answering that this all is long fixed in some way or another especially if you can not show them a friendly easy guide that just works. Glad to know fedora got that all covered.

Will forward to my fancy pants friends with 4k touch screen laptops

Re: Fedora dev: “HN feedback on what they want from their Desktop – We got it”

#85
post #6

I'm using a 4k screen and a HiDPI thinkpad (T460p) for my workstation and it works amazingly well even today. Was a wild ride since Skylake + 4k + docking station became stable only recently with Linux 4.9, but scaling always worked. Here's what it takes: Xft DPI and hinting settings (font rendering): # .Xresources Xft.dpi: 144 Xft.hinting: 1 Xft.hintstyle: hintslight Xft.antialias: 1 Xcursor.size: 48 Xcursor.theme:…

The reduced-resolution thing has been a trick for ages, I just refused to use the 4k screen I paid a premium for at half res with horrid (seriously, horrid complete with artifacts and fuzz, I even patched xrandr to disable bi-cubic filtering trying to make it ok and still couldn't stand it) looking text aliasing. I'm impressed you'd call that "pretty much perfect and comparable (if not better) to macOS with a recent…

Isn't especially mac known for having various issues with dual monitor setups? Sure the scaling works pretty well but the flicker and the idea that you can only use it with power cable are definitly deal breakers for me.

Re: Fedora dev: “HN feedback on what they want from their Desktop – We got it”

#86

My advice: Instead of supporting a bunch of hardware poorly make one laptop like the macbook pro with: * 2 ram slots * 2 M.2 SSD slots * a decent kb * a decent touchpad * a decent screen * discrete graphics * good battery management (you can do this because it's only one) * thunderbolt 3 * at least 3 usb ports * no dvd * ONE TRRS audio port * ethernet * HDMI for legacy reasons forget about * thinnest * lightest * or…

I rather have no dedicated graphics and couldn't care less about touch pad and screen but want a decent keyboard. People want different things, that's something Apple always sucked for

Re: Fedora dev: “HN feedback on what they want from their Desktop – We got it”

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://minifree.org/product/libreboot-x220/ Upd: this is a 12" laptop. However, they offered Libreboot X400 before, which is 14". You can still get one via https://minifree.org/product/libreboot-installation-service/

This computer looks like it comes from 90s.

> it comes from the 90's

What does that even mean? Can you be more specific?

Re: Fedora dev: “HN feedback on what they want from their Desktop – We got it”

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://minifree.org/product/libreboot-x220/ Upd: this is a 12" laptop. However, they offered Libreboot X400 before, which is 14". You can still get one via https://minifree.org/product/libreboot-installation-service/

This computer looks like it comes from 90s.

[deleted]

Re: Fedora dev: “HN feedback on what they want from their Desktop – We got it”

#89
post #45

I've tried running newer CentOS and Fedora GNOME environments but they always feel so much slower than Xfce or unity. When I open ps it shows gnome-shell constantly using 10% cpu and 20-30% memory. Opening menus and switching desktops is such a pain with all the delay. I found this true with Virtual Machines as well.

I run Gnome Shell on Arch and haven't experienced this. Did you file or contribute your specs to a bug report?

Re: Fedora dev: “HN feedback on what they want from their Desktop – We got it”

#90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://minifree.org/product/libreboot-x220/ Upd: this is a 12" laptop. However, they offered Libreboot X400 before, which is 14". You can still get one via https://minifree.org/product/libreboot-installation-service/

This computer looks like it comes from 90s.

Because it's Thinkpad and it should look like that.
Post reply on HN