Earlier quoted context omitted.
Basically people move out to the suburbs so they can have more control of the area around them.
...so they agree to give up their property rights to an undemocratically elected group?
Comcast internet speed improved with non-Comcast hardware
161–170 of 181 posts
Re: Comcast internet speed improved with non-Comcast hardware
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
In many apartment buildings the 2.4 Ghz spectrum is just too crowded. Just using a cheap 5Ghz 11n without breamforming would likely solve the problem. I've got at least 40 bss's on 2.4 and I'm the only one on 5Ghz. It's crazy. I'd say Comcast should use 5Ghz but then that spectrum will get crowded too.
All devices going forward (especially isp routers) _should_ use only 5ghz. Consumers should have to spend extra on 2.4 AP gear to support legacy client devices. 5ghz has reduced propagation and there are so many more channels available that it is actually optimal to use in dense evvironments. Mesh wifi is pretty much a requirement for a lot of users to keep the same coverage with multiple rooms compared with their ex…
In addition, I think Sonos still sells devices without 5GHz radios (and probably plenty of other companies).
Re: Comcast internet speed improved with non-Comcast hardware
#163Comcast ripped me off much more than that. My HOA signed a (incredible bad) deal with Comcast to provide basic channels (the ones nobody wants) for $35/unit* * for 3 years. Then, Comcast's rep allegedly* forged the contract to last 8 years instead of 3. The stupid manager lost the emails, Comcast insisted on the (allegedly* forged) 8-year contract and so the HOA paid it until the manager found the original signed con…
Every single Home Owner's Association should immediately die in a hole.
I agree though that regulatory HOA's suck in general.
Re: Comcast internet speed improved with non-Comcast hardware
#164Don't use Speedtest.net. The major providers all prioritize their traffic and it gives unrealistic results. I built a graphical console-based speed tester (client+server) that you can run yourself to get a more accurate picture and test between your home and servers you actually use: https://github.com/chrissnell/sparkyfish
Re: Comcast internet speed improved with non-Comcast hardware
#165Re: Comcast internet speed improved with non-Comcast hardware
#166Re: Comcast internet speed improved with non-Comcast hardware
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
Every single Home Owner's Association should immediately die in a hole.
Honestly, I like mine. Let's see... - No palm trees: great, they're tacky as all hell, fall over too easily and people never maintain them so they fill up with rats - No tall screening trees: great, same basic reasons - No painting your house: great, there's always some idiot who wants a horribly clashing house - File for changes: not a big deal, if your stuff is in order it usually takes a couple days. - Can't leave…
Re: Comcast internet speed improved with non-Comcast hardware
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
...so they agree to give up their property rights to an undemocratically elected group?
HOA boards are democratically elected.
Does every member of a family get a vote? How about every adult? Or is it just one vote per household?
Re: Comcast internet speed improved with non-Comcast hardware
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
All devices going forward (especially isp routers) _should_ use only 5ghz. Consumers should have to spend extra on 2.4 AP gear to support legacy client devices. 5ghz has reduced propagation and there are so many more channels available that it is actually optimal to use in dense evvironments. Mesh wifi is pretty much a requirement for a lot of users to keep the same coverage with multiple rooms compared with their ex…
5GHz isn't a panacea, at least in my experience. It doesn't penetrate walls well enough to reach to the edges of my (quite small) apartment, so my laptops and other devices drop down to an acceptable rate on 2.4GHz. In addition, I think Sonos still sells devices without 5GHz radios (and probably plenty of other companies).
Lack of support is a huge problem though. Tons of devices are sold without 5Ghz support.
Re: Comcast internet speed improved with non-Comcast hardware
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
All devices going forward (especially isp routers) _should_ use only 5ghz. Consumers should have to spend extra on 2.4 AP gear to support legacy client devices. 5ghz has reduced propagation and there are so many more channels available that it is actually optimal to use in dense evvironments. Mesh wifi is pretty much a requirement for a lot of users to keep the same coverage with multiple rooms compared with their ex…
5GHz isn't a panacea, at least in my experience. It doesn't penetrate walls well enough to reach to the edges of my (quite small) apartment, so my laptops and other devices drop down to an acceptable rate on 2.4GHz. In addition, I think Sonos still sells devices without 5GHz radios (and probably plenty of other companies).
2.4ghz works perfectly, and always has. I think the real answer here is more dual band routers, even in cheapo ISP provided combo boxes.