Live data from Hacker News

Most Electronics Being Banned on Certain US-Bound Flights

bloomberg.com

71–80 of 488 posts

Re: Most Electronics Being Banned on Certain US-Bound Flights

#71
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess it's a shoutout to Trump's core supporters that he's still committed to doing "The Right Thing" by putting those brown people in their proper places. (Totally not picked because they're muslim, I swear, wink wink.)

So who was Obama appealing to among his core supporters, when he attacked "brown people" in Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen?

Trump supporters...

Re: Most Electronics Being Banned on Certain US-Bound Flights

#72
post #68
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The security check to get into the airport makes sense if you want to avoid terrorist attacks at the airport.

But why not just move the original check then to the edge of the airport, expanding the "safe zone".

The second check to get into a plane is more exhaustive. They let you introduce liquids into the airport!

Re: Most Electronics Being Banned on Certain US-Bound Flights

#73

You look at this and say to yourself, "this doesn't make any sense! i don't get how allowing cell phones and 'medical devices' (nebulous term) into carry ons, but demanding that laptops go into checked baggage is keeping us safe!" And you're right! It isn't. But then you realize that the special interests that came up with this policy were paid LARGE SUMS OF MONEY to impress Trump and all of his supporters and career…

Look, I hate Trump. But air security policy hasn't been rational for a long time. Don't tie every government dysfunction to Trump.

I can see where you are coming from. But isn't this a policy directly from the administration?

It seems they've taken a keen interest in making travel very painful for select foreigners. I don't think this is a policy from anyone other than the new government?

Re: Most Electronics Being Banned on Certain US-Bound Flights

#74
When I was passing through Singapore once, two Americans in front of me started taking their shoes off right before the security check. The security officer gave them a weird look and said they can put it back on because he uses a scanner and doesn't need to look inside everyones shoe. Fast forward 3 years and i'm reading comments on HN about double security check not being bad heh.

Checked in bag is not free. Checked in bags also get manhandled unless you pay hefty to get the fragile tag and insurance. For someone cheap like me who carries a backpack which is free so far, the extra cost is my biggest concern. Hope something like this doesn't happen in domestic flights.

Edit: typos

Re: Most Electronics Being Banned on Certain US-Bound Flights

#75

You look at this and say to yourself, "this doesn't make any sense! i don't get how allowing cell phones and 'medical devices' (nebulous term) into carry ons, but demanding that laptops go into checked baggage is keeping us safe!" And you're right! It isn't. But then you realize that the special interests that came up with this policy were paid LARGE SUMS OF MONEY to impress Trump and all of his supporters and career…

Dude, it's a 96 hour ban, all signs point to this being a targeted response to a specific credible threat.

Chill.

Re: Most Electronics Being Banned on Certain US-Bound Flights

#77
post #64
post #39

Thank you for your reasonable comment. You're going to get down voted into oblivion for it though. The right to privacy, drone strikes, budgets, Russia, etc. aren't issues until the D after someone's name turns into an R. Get with the program or lose all your internet points, man.

I'd argue that criticizing a new President for taking bad policies even further isn't misguided.

Right? I would highlight the negative aspects of any policy from any administration, no matter who or what is involved.

I would then make rational suggestions on how to fix it.

When an administration routinely refuses to follow logic, compromise, betterment of humanity- this law doesn't even help Americans!- then that administration earns my cynicism and disrespect.

Re: Most Electronics Being Banned on Certain US-Bound Flights

#78
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess it's a shoutout to Trump's core supporters that he's still committed to doing "The Right Thing" by putting those brown people in their proper places. (Totally not picked because they're muslim, I swear, wink wink.)

So who was Obama appealing to among his core supporters, when he attacked "brown people" in Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen?

People who don't like ISIS, ghaddafi, ISIS/AQ, the taliban, ibid, pirates, and AQAP respectively.

Re: Most Electronics Being Banned on Certain US-Bound Flights

#79
post #56

Note that some airlines, like Delta, do not allow computers or lithium batteries in checked luggage (for example: https://www.delta.com/content/www/en_US/traveling-with-us/ba... && https://www.delta.com/content/www/en_US/traveling-with-us/ba... ) so this essentially means that other than phones, these things are completely banned and will have to be shipped separately or not shipped at all. EDIT: Also, no airline tha…

> Note that some airlines, like Delta, do not allow computers or lithium batteries in checked luggage [...] so this essentially means that other than phones, these things are completely banned and will have to be shipped separately or not shipped at all.

This is incorrect, only spare batteries aren't allowed in checked baggage, computers are fine. From your second link [1]:

> Lithium ion batteries installed in a personal electronic device can be transported as checked or carry on baggage. Lithium ion batteries not installed in a device (spares) must be in carry-on baggage and no more than two (2) spares between 100 and 160 watt hours are allowed.

[1] https://www.delta.com/content/www/en_US/traveling-with-us/ba...

Re: Most Electronics Being Banned on Certain US-Bound Flights

#80
post #51
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Spare (laptop) batteries are not allowed as checked luggage [1] (presumably the danger of a shorted battery causing a hull fire or explosion). Why would a laptop go into checked when an equivalently sized battery not be allowed? Further discrepancies that show we don't have a rational executive branch. [1] https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/as...

Laptops don't have exposed terminals.

Neither do the external power packs that are currently banned in checked luggage
Post reply on HN