Live data from Hacker News

Tyson Foods CEO: The Future of Food Might Be Meatless

foxbusiness.com

181–190 of 205 posts

Re: Tyson Foods CEO: The Future of Food Might Be Meatless

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're not in Memphis. They're in San Francisco. My guess for why they're named Memphis Meats is ”[a founder's] family also owns a chain of 43 BBQ restaurants based out of Memphis, Tennessee"

I was curious about that too being from Memphis. Which BBQ chain?

Baby Jacks BBQ

You're from Memphis? It's so rare to run into another Memphian on HN.

Re: Tyson Foods CEO: The Future of Food Might Be Meatless

#182
post #176
post #163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So to me this makes it even lesser of a problem namely all we have to do is fix the legal system and stop them from lobbying aggressively instead of most of the world population all of a sudden changing its diet entirely.

Your solution here is laughable. A couple of points: 1. I mentioned that the current laws are lax for a reason. There really isn't much in the way of controls over animal agriculture other than things that might affect public health and safety. Getting all of these companies to play ball with the current legal environment will not get us anywhere near where we would need to be. 2. The idea that "all" we have to do is…

Why do you not believe in the political system and the power that comes with that? We the people can change laws if we choose to, to sit on the bench and cry foul however will not get you anywhere. You live in (presumably US) the freest country in the world and want to take things in your hand while not believing in democracy and convincing your fellow citizens to see eye to eye with you on issues like this? No one said changing the system is easy it takes dedication and effort if you truly believe evil companies are the problem force them to follow the law if you think the laws are in adequate lobby for new ones. Political passivity is not the answer. I highly recommend reading Beyond Fear by Bruce Schneier [1].

[1] https://www.schneier.com/books/beyond_fear/

Re: Tyson Foods CEO: The Future of Food Might Be Meatless

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was curious about that too being from Memphis. Which BBQ chain?

Baby Jacks BBQ You're from Memphis? It's so rare to run into another Memphian on HN.

I'm about 10-20 minutes away from it right now. Ain't had Baby Jacks. Might have to try it. Far as Memphians, yeah there's just a handful of us that I've seen. Gonna have a Memphis HN get-together one day with all of us.

Re: Tyson Foods CEO: The Future of Food Might Be Meatless

#184
post #7

if they can make affordable plant based chicken that's as tasty and protein-packed as real chicken and veg beef that's as good as real beef, then I'm 100% in. the biggest problem with non-meat foods (for me) has always been with their macros. I can get 32g of protein with nearly zero fat or carbs from 4oz of chicken for less than $2 a serving. Last I checked, this was not possible with alternative food.

A big part of those 'macros' is farm subsidies. Meat is artificially cheap in the US. Kind of ridiculously so.

Can you quantify that at all? How much of a discount is there baked in due to subsidies?

Re: Tyson Foods CEO: The Future of Food Might Be Meatless

#185
post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly, if all you do is just stop eating beef, you'll cut your footprint from meat by more than half. A serving of chicken takes about 20% of the resources of the same serving of beef. Lighter cuts of meat combined with the right spices are a gateway to lots of interesting dishes with less or even no meat.

You'll get roughly the same amount of meat from 1 cow as you will from 200 chickens. Worth considering if pounds of flesh per life is a factor in your decision.

Grandparent is likely talking about environmental effect per amount of meat produced. Cows are much worse than chicken in that regard because of all the methane that they're farting out.

Re: Tyson Foods CEO: The Future of Food Might Be Meatless

#186
post #175
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> No one is "going back to the farm" to raise their own cattle, which they slaughter themselves, for a steak. It also doesn't scale to the "buy cheap steaks and grill a steak for lunch every day" level that some people do. I'm sorry, but you are quite wrong. There are mobile slaughterhouses that cater to this exact market: A farmer raises a couple cows, the mobile butcher slaughters the animal and process the meat in…

> You need to meet some more rural friends to see other ways that people live. Your rural way of living does not scale to the number of people we currently have living on Earth. It also does not scale to meet some people's current consumption patterns, which is one of my points. > Especially warrior cultures ate a lot of meat. "Warrior culture" does not scale to 8 billion people. You can't use this as justification t…

We started talking about what people will do.

Now you've decided to talk about what people should do.

That's an entirely different topic.

By the fact that you've moved the goalposts, I take it you acknowledge my point that eating animals is not: "one of those things that in 50 to 100 years people will look back on with bewilderment"?

Re: Tyson Foods CEO: The Future of Food Might Be Meatless

#187
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A big part of those 'macros' is farm subsidies. Meat is artificially cheap in the US. Kind of ridiculously so.

Can you quantify that at all? How much of a discount is there baked in due to subsidies?

Here's a list written by a guy who wrote a book on the economics of meat production in the US. (Yeah, it's on the PETA web site, but somehow the 'i just really like big Macs' crowd doesn't get around to doing research on food in the same way...)

http://www.peta.org/living/food/10-things-wish-everyone-knew...

His top-line number is that a $5 burger would cost $13 without various subsidies, funded by $38B or year in subsidies to the meat industry.

I also found claims that removing subsidies would eventually lower prices by allowing competition from countries without subsidies. But my guess is there's a limit to bottom price globally given current tech, regulations, tariffs, and land availability. And it's difficult to know where that is relative to subsidizes process in the US...

Re: Tyson Foods CEO: The Future of Food Might Be Meatless

#188
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gardein Breakfast Patties[1][2] retail for $3 at my grocery store and regularly have $1-off in-store coupons. Even the macros are solid. Everything else I've tried from Gardein has been excellent as well, and this is far from the best stuff out there. [1] https://gardein.com/products/breakfast-patties/ [2] http://imgur.com/XUodQQv

I'd be willing to give this a try. Out of curiosity, what would you consider the best (or at least respectably high)?

I wish I had an answer for you, I'm really honestly not too educated on the subject. I just know that there are more expensive and better reviewed meat-replacements out there than what I've personally bought in the store. That being said, Gardein is no slouch. I've also been to The Herbivorous Butcher in Minneapolis and Twin Cities Veg Fest and the quality of meat-replacements (and cheese-replacements) at both those places were on a whole other level.

Re: Tyson Foods CEO: The Future of Food Might Be Meatless

#189
post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You'll get roughly the same amount of meat from 1 cow as you will from 200 chickens. Worth considering if pounds of flesh per life is a factor in your decision.

Grandparent is likely talking about environmental effect per amount of meat produced. Cows are much worse than chicken in that regard because of all the methane that they're farting out.

No one's contesting that, but you can't only consider environmental impact when the differences in animal welfare are unfathomably worse for chicken meat production - easily orders of magnitude worse per pound of meat.

Anyone thinking of trading beef consumption for chicken for one ethical reason (environment) should really be aware of and consider all ethical implications first. I strongly believe people underestimate the harm chickens go through (beef cows are treated pretty well, unlike chickens), let alone understand the number of chickens they eat per year.

Re: Tyson Foods CEO: The Future of Food Might Be Meatless

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Baby Jacks BBQ You're from Memphis? It's so rare to run into another Memphian on HN.

I'm about 10-20 minutes away from it right now. Ain't had Baby Jacks. Might have to try it. Far as Memphians, yeah there's just a handful of us that I've seen. Gonna have a Memphis HN get-together one day with all of us.

Agreed!
Post reply on HN