Dear Apple
21–30 of 211 posts
Re: Dear Apple
#22Re: Dear Apple
#23It would also be an absolute joy if we could actually refactor with Xcode.
I immediately downloaded appcode when I found I couldn't rename variables in swift
Sadly, that's the only refactoring support available right now.
Re: Dear Apple
#24I don't think it's considered a problem by the team at Apple, or even by some developers, but I would love a more stable Swift language. The number of changes per version * the number of projects in the world is causing a large amount of work and instability. This is contributing to the low tool quality as well.
Swift 3 had a purposeful effort to prioritize syntax-impacting changes and API changes as possible with the idea that Swift 4 and beyond would have backward compatibility for Swift 3 code. Swift 4/5 will establish ABI compatibility, so that binary swift libraries will work across compiler versions
Another year of breaking changes, hooray!
Re: Dear Apple
#25Re: Dear Apple
#26Can we give this HN post a better title? This is atrociously clickbaiting. Granted it just goes to GitHub, but I would like to have at least an _inkling_ of what I'm about to read.
Re: Dear Apple
#27I thought this was a letter from Github to Apple, but was disappointed to discover that it was a letter from some subset of the Apple developer community.
I recognize that this is sort of pulling at a thread, but since Github is so widely used, perhaps some sort of exception can be made?
Re: Dear Apple
#28It's absurd to have to beg the wealthiest software company in the world for what should be considered really basic stuff. Xcode is consistently unstable, slow, missing simple essential functionality (like refactoring), and Apple's interface builder is something that most experienced Apple devs know to run for the hills from.
I will say, though, that I've always liked IB (though not storyboards). But then there's the wonderful "Oh, you opened a nib, I should move something around in the XML." -> SCM status changes even though I didn't modify the file.
Re: Dear Apple
#29It's absurd to have to beg the wealthiest software company in the world for what should be considered really basic stuff. Xcode is consistently unstable, slow, missing simple essential functionality (like refactoring), and Apple's interface builder is something that most experienced Apple devs know to run for the hills from.
Once a given institution reaches a certain scale, the apparent limitations on human attention at the top of the hierarchy make it impossible for the organization to contemplate small ventures. Like the parable of Bill Gates finding a hundred-dollar bill on the sidewalk, it's no longer worth the time to stoop to pick up the small stuff.
(Intuitively, this seems related to the absurd inflation in the cost of public works in the US over the last century.)