Live data from Hacker News

Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

arstechnica.com

161–170 of 344 posts

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#161

I'm really looking forward to the next 5 or 6 years, when all of the software patents created in the 90s and 2000's expire. It can't come soon enough.

Or wait until some conglomerate lobbies hard enough to make software patents last as long as the copyright on Micky Mouse.

Oh dear God please no

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#162
post #100

Oracle is set to repeat the trajectory of SCO. Their primary product (the Oracle DB engine) is being displaced by the NoSQL and things like Postgres. The "next generation" of developers equals SQL engines with "old and bad", and when forced, it ends up with Postgres anyway. Oracle used to survive in significant part by the support of the "database administrators" class. This layer of support is also becoming thinner…

Maybe for startups, on the enterprise space I am yet to see any customer move away from Oracle, SQL Server, DB2 and similar.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huh? "The 9th [circuit]" is a Federal circuit court...

The terminology's confusing, but there's a court named the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit [1], even though the term "federal circuit court" also colloquially means the Courts of Appeals in general. This Federal Circuit is a non-geographical Court of Appeals, separate from the 11 numbered, geographically based Courts of Appeals, and has exclusive jurisdiction over patent cases (among a few other things). The…

Ah, so the "Federal Circuit" is another court at the same level as the other circuit courts that doesn't have a number associated with it. The choice of abbreviation is confusing to say the least.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#164

Oracle is such a shit company. There are still some great hackers there but Larry Ellison is an asshole, and I don't envy anyone who has to work for him even indirectly. "Left Oracle's Java business in tatters" eh? Where was their mobile OS? Their Dalvik? The wounds to Java have all been self-inflicted. If they succeed in copyrighting the API then where does this leave OpenJDK? Operating at the mercy of Larry fucking…

> Oracle is such a shit company

Oracle is a parasite, milking the innovations of years ago through customer lock-in and aggressive litigation.

They are a black hole in the tech ecosystem, extracting hundreds of billions of value for themselves, profiting from open source while contributing very little back to the community.

If they win this lawsuit it will be a dark day for innovation and a big loss for shared knowledge and progress.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#165
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's assume Oracle wins on appeal... What's next? Is everyone suddenly writing .Net code? Or are we left to find languages with lapsed copyrights? Fortran IV and Snobol are the new hotness! Everyone in to the pool!

Languages without a corporate owner.

Good luck finding those.

Even Fortran, C and C++ compilers depend on the work that a few corporations like Apple, Google, Intel, Microsoft,... put working on the compilers and sending employees to ANSI meetings.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#166
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it's nearly impossible to find someone separating the quintessential geek love for Google and geek hatred for Oracle from the facts of the case other than Mueller. But you can't separate the facts from the quintessential paid love for Oracle and the paid hatred for Google of Mueller. And exactly what tech has been ripping Google?

>But you can't separate the facts from the quintessential paid love for Oracle and the paid hatred for Google of Mueller. Sure, which is why I was asking you for someone arguing this who was more impeccably non-biased. I realize that some opinions in arguments do not deserve being argued for, such as mass genocide, but I don't think this case is as clear cut and it's a little disturbing to me that the internet was so…

Microsoft Legal seems to agree with Google on this due to there's interaction with Wine emulation software which directly costs Microsoft revinue.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software). Microsoft has not made public statements about Wine. However, the Microsoft Update software will block updates to Microsoft applications running in Wine. On 16 February 2005, Ivan Leo Puoti discovered that Microsoft had started checking the Windows Registry for the Wine configuration key and would block the Windows Update for any component.[95] As Puoti noted, "It's also the first time Microsoft acknowledges the existence of Wine."

That's about as unbiased as you can get IMO.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#167
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Languages without a corporate owner.

JavaScript is right out. There's such a mish-mash of API owners there that it will give decades of court cases from copyright trolls. This is one of the most important tech cases in history. Oracle is on a fast-track to destroying the software industry with it.

Well, Google started it when they tried to avoid paying Java SE license to use it in embedded devices.

For example, the guys from MicroEJ did the things the right way and don't have any issues with Oracle,

http://www.microej.com/products/device-software-development/...

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#168
Oracle is starting to remind me a lot of SCO:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO/Linux_controversies

That hasn't worked out well for them.

IMO, successful technology companies do not correlate with the value dollarsSpentOnLitigation/overallRevenue.

I think selling ORCL and buying QQQ will be a profitable trade in the next 5 or so years.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#169

Although Oracle denied they bought Sun just to sue Google you have to wonder since they are claiming "billions" in damages and only paid $7.4 billion after IBM dropped their $7.0 billion bid. This purchase was such a seminal moment for the industry you have to wonder what an alternative history would look like if say IBM or Google made the purchase not to mention some dark horses like Amazon or Red hat.

They absolutely bought Sun just to sue. I used to know someone personally involved on the case. Oracle is a horrible company.

To be fair, Google's "don't be evil" is also a bunch of crap. They've done their fair share of shady and exploitive things.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#170

Yeah. I got a suggestion. Don't join the industry. And if you're still in college, don't major in Computer Science Edit: Got hellbanned lol. @gregnoire: HN is a giant circlejerk You prolly think this site is so great and intellectual just because it has ycombinator in the URL. Internet comments fundamentally suck @DanBC: Pretty sure I got hellbanned. It's been an hour, still can't make new comments @sjwright: The med…

You weren't hellbanned, but you had violated the guidelines sufficiently to get enough downvotes to become subject to some of the same limitations. We've now banned this account for only posting uncivilly and unsubstantively.

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13624326 and marked it off-topic.

Post reply on HN