Live data from Hacker News

Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

arstechnica.com

11–20 of 344 posts

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#13
post #9

I hope Oracle wins. The sooner Java dies, the better.

Are you that hateful of Java that you are blind to the implications of an Oracle win? It won't be just Java 'dying.'

Our laws governing software are so fundamentally broken already lol. It doesn't matter anymore.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#15

Oracle is at that stage where they didn't invent or do anything right in the last 5 years but try to get money from lawsuits.

From what I've been told by a contact in their database sales team is that there pipeline for on-premise licenses is drying up quickly but their SaaS business is doing well.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#16
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you that hateful of Java that you are blind to the implications of an Oracle win? It won't be just Java 'dying.'

Our laws governing software are so fundamentally broken already lol. It doesn't matter anymore.

This is not helpful. Specifically, petulance will not lead to improvement.

To that end, do you have any suggestions on making things better? Do you contribute to any organizations that are trying?

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#17
post #11

I hope Oracle wins. The sooner Java dies, the better.

I still don't understand why Google did not buy Sun Microsystems. They hired a lot of the staff anyway, and could have avoided the lawsuit.

Hiring the staff and handling the lawsuit - Google has their own in-house law firm anyways - has likely worked out to be cheaper for them than buying Sun Microsystems would have been.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#18
post #11

I hope Oracle wins. The sooner Java dies, the better.

I still don't understand why Google did not buy Sun Microsystems. They hired a lot of the staff anyway, and could have avoided the lawsuit.

It's $7.4 billion they didn't need to spend. The legal fees are a fraction of that.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#19
Okay, either I'm crazy or everyone else is. Assuming the court isn't trying to set a new precedent with regards to software it seems like Oracle should have easily won this case. There is an argument to be made that APIs shouldn't be copyrightable but surely it's not fair use -- Google's use of Java doesn't even come close to meeting the criteria.

Re: Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in API battle

#20
Although Oracle denied they bought Sun just to sue Google you have to wonder since they are claiming "billions" in damages and only paid $7.4 billion after IBM dropped their $7.0 billion bid.

This purchase was such a seminal moment for the industry you have to wonder what an alternative history would look like if say IBM or Google made the purchase not to mention some dark horses like Amazon or Red hat.

Post reply on HN