Live data from Hacker News

Circuit building: stop using antique parts (2014)

sensitiveresearch.com

71–80 of 169 posts

Re: Circuit building: stop using antique parts (2014)

#71
Why use a 120 in todays modern age? Because that thing you're repairing was Woz'd to the point that that VCE plays an important part in the circuit's operation.

Keep your TIPS, you might not necessarily use them for that brand new design of yours, but you'll probably use them for something.

Re: Circuit building: stop using antique parts (2014)

#72

There is nothing wrong with bipolar transistors. They aren't antiquated. FETs have definitely overtaken them in power applications (for good reason) but it seems hard to displace them for small signal applications. Small signal FETs just aren't that plentiful or cheap. There are many instances where a small signal FET makes sense (level translators, etc) but the cost doesn't justify its use. Using a 2n2222 and the li…

The article seems mostly right when it's about interfacing logic circuits with loads that require even moderate currents. FET is king in this field. I've a little aquarium and I've noticed how fish always get scared when lights turn suddenly on or off. So I took an Arduino and wrote a timer app for it, using PWM to slowly drive the output up over 60 minutes (sunrise), keep it at max for a few hours, then drive it dow…

There is a purpose-designed Chinese chip exactly for your situation - control brightness of a LED strip based on PWM input. Compared to a bare MOSFET, this chip gives you higher efficiency, current-controlled (i.e. flicker-free) output and ability to drive LEDs directly (without current-limiting resistors).

PT4115, pretty cheap on ebay and other usual places.

Re: Circuit building: stop using antique parts (2014)

#73
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>In particular, this made me sad: the 10K resistor to ground isn't strictly necessary, but it ensures that the MOSFET remains OFF if the arduino is disconnected or it's pin is not an OUTPUT. Not sure why that made you sad (extraneous ' in its?). But I agree about the static-sensitive disadvantage of MOSFETs. Also, the author mentions that a TIP120 is not a transistor but a darlington pair (two transistors in one) but…

It wasn't the grammar :-) it was that the author considered the 10K resistor to ground as "not strictly necessary". It is critical if the microprocessor pin can float (tri-state). Without it, and a floating gate, not only will the FET eventually turn on, it can be damaged by excess charge build up.

Not just excessive charge up it could be possible for it to be stuck in its linear region and dissipate a lot of power as it's spuriously turning on because there's a charge on the gate. I've managed to do that one on accident with a bad motor driving circuit. Though it was also largely caused by coupling on the breadboard.

Re: Circuit building: stop using antique parts (2014)

#74
post #29
post #23

If you want to switch power, MOSFETs are the way to go today. Voltage drop is near zero. Digi-Key has over a thousand MOSFETs in TO-220 packages. Here's one of the cheapest with a low gate threshold.[1] Probably good enough for most Arduino on/off applications. MOSFETs do have some problems. They can draw large gate currents for the first few nanoseconds of turn-on, which can overload whatever is driving them. The ga…

I would love to see something on digikey or mouser that allowed me to search for MOSFETs in a way that was less painful. Let's say you wanted to do a special purpose switching power supply. Digikey doesn't have a column for gate capacitance (for the mosfet), or Q (for the inductor). All that manual work to read datasheets is terrible, especially if your design takes a little while to perfect and some of the component…

Digikey does have the gate capacitance, just specified in a weird way - gate charge @ voltage. Most higher power FETs are always specified @ 10V gate, so it's directly equivalent.

Re: Circuit building: stop using antique parts (2014)

#75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I ever made analog audio equipment professionally, I would add an entire series of switches and dials that weren't wired up to anything.

You could label them like "warmth", "aggressiveness", "heart", and have people go apeshit trying to figure out the best setting for their song.

"Girth"

Re: Circuit building: stop using antique parts (2014)

#76

I'm an electronics amateur, got a question here: I use a PN2222 [1] transistor to switch a 5V supply through an infrared LED from a microcontroller. It works, but should I be using something better/smaller/more cost effective/more appropriate for the circuit [2]? [1] https://blog.bschwind.com/2016/05/29/sending-infrared-comman... [2] https://blog.bschwind.com/2016/05/29/sending-infrared-comman... (the resistor in the…

For something like that? If it works, it's good.

If you are trying to optimize for whatever parameters, then maybe there are better parts. But for something simple and basic like that, its fine.

Re: Circuit building: stop using antique parts (2014)

#77
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you properly drive a 2N3055 (so all the way to 'on' or all the way to 'off') you'd have to put a pretty good current through it to get it to get hot. The trick is to use the highest voltage you can get away with (most power for the least amount of current). .6V * quite a few amps before you overcome the housings capacity to get rid of the heat. You'll need to properly drive it though and not at too high a frequenc…

> before you overcome the housings capacity to get rid of the heat. The thing is, most of these larger BJT parts were designed to be used with heatsinks, not usually standalone. IMHO, there's nothing wrong with dropping some voltage and dumping some heat. Sure, it isn't efficient, but if you size everything properly, and your project can accommodate the heatsink - then where's the problem? Heck, a long time ago you c…

> outside of the L298's weird footprint, and the fact that heatsinks for them are almost unobtanium

In a pinch: any piece of aluminum U profile will do, just drill a hole in it and use some heat conducting paste.

Re: Circuit building: stop using antique parts (2014)

#78

I'm an electronics amateur, got a question here: I use a PN2222 [1] transistor to switch a 5V supply through an infrared LED from a microcontroller. It works, but should I be using something better/smaller/more cost effective/more appropriate for the circuit [2]? [1] https://blog.bschwind.com/2016/05/29/sending-infrared-comman... [2] https://blog.bschwind.com/2016/05/29/sending-infrared-comman... (the resistor in the…

No, in fact in that circuit the PN2222 is the only thing limiting current to your LED. If you switch that to a MOSFET you'll blow up your LED unless you add a series resistor. (are you sure you aren't already giving too much current to your LED?)

Re: Circuit building: stop using antique parts (2014)

#80
post #29
post #23

If you want to switch power, MOSFETs are the way to go today. Voltage drop is near zero. Digi-Key has over a thousand MOSFETs in TO-220 packages. Here's one of the cheapest with a low gate threshold.[1] Probably good enough for most Arduino on/off applications. MOSFETs do have some problems. They can draw large gate currents for the first few nanoseconds of turn-on, which can overload whatever is driving them. The ga…

I would love to see something on digikey or mouser that allowed me to search for MOSFETs in a way that was less painful. Let's say you wanted to do a special purpose switching power supply. Digikey doesn't have a column for gate capacitance (for the mosfet), or Q (for the inductor). All that manual work to read datasheets is terrible, especially if your design takes a little while to perfect and some of the component…

Is the Octopart search engine still running? Or something like it?
Post reply on HN