Earlier quoted context omitted.
Skodas are quite popular in India
there aren't many cars in India compared to US or even some small European countries.
India 159m, USA 265m registered vehicles. India is the 6th largest producer of vehicles.
141–150 of 216 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Skodas are quite popular in India
there aren't many cars in India compared to US or even some small European countries.
India 159m, USA 265m registered vehicles. India is the 6th largest producer of vehicles.
One thing learned from: Volkswagen,airbnb,google,amazon,uber,facebook is to CHEAT. Illegal hotels, copyright infringement, skipping sales tax, fake cabs,profiting on personal data.. and now, illegal emission testing.
You should really read the autobiography of Arnold Schwarzenegger, then you get an idea of what it takes to be able to win.
One thing learned from: Volkswagen,airbnb,google,amazon,uber,facebook is to CHEAT. Illegal hotels, copyright infringement, skipping sales tax, fake cabs,profiting on personal data.. and now, illegal emission testing.
Certainly it would be easy to fine Facebook, Google in Europe for privacy/monopoly violations (i.e. things that actually matter) with huge fines?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
>though I hope you're joking about the guillotine I read that remark as this: If corporations are people legally, there should be certain crimes that lead to their dissolution. I assumed this was the proposal: If a corporation does something evil enough, its leaders going to prison and paying a fine isn't enough, it should face the corporate guillotine which revokes its incorporation.
Right, but one of the issues is that a corporate "person" isn't the same as an individual person, and they don't overlap completely. They are only treated as persons under the law with regard to certain rights/obligations (sue and be sued, open a bank account, pay taxes, etc). But a corporation isn't a person for purposes of criminal culpability; i.e. you could never arrest a corporation for murder. Though corporatio…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You dissolve the entity and sell the assests to pay back the costs of damage VW could pay the damages in its particular case without dissolution. What would you do with the extra money after liquidating its assets? It seems like you're simply arguing for even bigger fines.
Not the parent. If the company can pay for fines, fine. No need to dissolve them, but the leadership responsible still needs to face a judge. Just because you're part of a corporation, shouldn't mean you get to walk from crimes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> violating the environmental laws of every western country. European nations aren't "western"?
These terms were coined before the Americas were discovered by Europeans. Europe was the West, then you have the Middle East, then the Far East (China, Japan). That was the whole world to them pretty much. When the Americas were discovered they were known as the New World, and eventually became known as the West as well (Due to the fact that most of our culture comes from Europe, eg. Western Culture).
I suspect Rome (or some other city in Italy) is the centre of these terms, but I haven't looked for evidence of that.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The cheaper European brands like Skoda and SEAT also likely have significant volume. Skoda, for example, sold over a million vehicles—a non-trivial 10% of VW group's total. Audi sold something like 1.8M, probably with better margins than Skoda, so it's certainly a more important brand, but SEAT and Skoda aren't trivial either. Just in terms of car sales, SEAT + Skoda ≈ Audi.
Seat and skoda are only popular in handful of small European countries, vw is popular around the globe.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not the parent. If the company can pay for fines, fine. No need to dissolve them, but the leadership responsible still needs to face a judge. Just because you're part of a corporation, shouldn't mean you get to walk from crimes.
Kind of like this? https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/volkswagen-ag-agrees-plead-gu...
One thing learned from: Volkswagen,airbnb,google,amazon,uber,facebook is to CHEAT. Illegal hotels, copyright infringement, skipping sales tax, fake cabs,profiting on personal data.. and now, illegal emission testing.
That is how the world works. If you want to win, you have to be willing to do everything to get there. Not only for companies, but also in sport. Do you think the winners play fair? You should really read the autobiography of Arnold Schwarzenegger, then you get an idea of what it takes to be able to win.
Obviously, there are legal implications around the use of PEDs since many substances are illegal however I'm separating that out for this purpose.