Live data from Hacker News

Wine 2.0 released

winehq.org

41–50 of 314 posts

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#41
post #26

This brings me back to the early days of my Linux usage. I've always been fascinated by this project. My very nerdy dream has always been to try to contribute to it somehow. How hard is it to get in to the community?

Very straightforward. Just subscribe to the wine-devel mailing list, pick some bugs, and off you go!

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#42

I've been using computers my whole life, and a lot of the magic has been explained away. Wine is a project that continues to astound me. Grats to the Wine team, this is great!

Took the words out of my mouth. It's saved me from having to install complex or insecure VMs or additional machines so many times I can't count. I also enjoy using it to bundle applications usable on Linux and MacOS that otherwise were locked in to windows.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#43

Cool. I have to admit I haven't thought about Wine in a while because I can't think of any software I use that doesn't have a Linux version. What are people's use-cases nowadays?

Tag&Rename [1], a still maintained Windows-only shareware excellent at tagging music. Occasional use, Linux equivalents suck in various ways, it's perfectly configured to my needs, and works perfectly in Wine so why change it :) [1] http://www.softpointer.com/tr.htm EDIT: thanks for the Linux alternative suggestions everyone! I have (had) mostly the same complaints about ExFalso / Puddletag / EasyTAG as the ones I po…

Let the computer do the work, I recommend beets which pulls Musicbrainz data: http://beets.io/

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#44
post #37

> The main highlights are the support for Microsoft Office 2013, and the 64-bit support on macOS. This made me chuckle. Better late than never I suppose.

I havent used office in a many years now.. but I thought MS Office is now an online offering similar to Google Docs?

There's a "light" version available online, but you must be thinking about Office 365.

Although the core product is still desktop based, they've been shifting to an optional subscription model where you pay $9/month or so for perpetual updates and 1tb of storage.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#45

> The main highlights are the support for Microsoft Office 2013, and the 64-bit support on macOS. This made me chuckle. Better late than never I suppose.

you're falling for MS's marketing gimmick: "let's put the year in the product name so it will slowly shame and pressure people to give us more money for next years version (whose killer feature is a new splash screen with a year that is closer to now).

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#46
I could't get my Windows 10 installation on my iMac to run the 2004 game Vampire the Masquerade Bloodlines. Tried it with Crossover for Mac (Wine based) - and it worked.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#47

Cool. I have to admit I haven't thought about Wine in a while because I can't think of any software I use that doesn't have a Linux version. What are people's use-cases nowadays?

One I can think of right off the bat is gaming, especially old games that might never be ported to Linux (or, for that matter, remain compatible with newer versions of Windows). Also, for a while (before they DRM'd it) I ran the Reason DAW on a linux box. They didn't have windows 7 drivers for my MIDI keyboard at the time, but they did have Linux drivers somehow.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#48
post #37

> The main highlights are the support for Microsoft Office 2013, and the 64-bit support on macOS. This made me chuckle. Better late than never I suppose.

I havent used office in a many years now.. but I thought MS Office is now an online offering similar to Google Docs?

Yes and no.

The old installable still exists and many features only exists in that version. The offline version has also become a lot easier to install.

The web app version is lacking in a number of ways and was buggy last I tried.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#49
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tag&Rename [1], a still maintained Windows-only shareware excellent at tagging music. Occasional use, Linux equivalents suck in various ways, it's perfectly configured to my needs, and works perfectly in Wine so why change it :) [1] http://www.softpointer.com/tr.htm EDIT: thanks for the Linux alternative suggestions everyone! I have (had) mostly the same complaints about ExFalso / Puddletag / EasyTAG as the ones I po…

What are the shortcomings you find in Picard?

Last time I tried (which may be old): performance, opaqueness in what the musicbrainz magic is supposed/about to do to my files, lack of features and UX conveniences making it impossible to reproduce my stupidly picky tagging / filenaming scheme :)

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#50

Cool. I have to admit I haven't thought about Wine in a while because I can't think of any software I use that doesn't have a Linux version. What are people's use-cases nowadays?

Back before the demise of what.cd, I used Wine for Exact Audio Copy. As far as I know, there was still no "approved" cd ripper that would run natively on Linux.
Post reply on HN