Here's another nifty visualisation - this time with drone strikes: http://drones.pitchinteractive.com/
The statement that only 2% are high profile targets is kind of misleading. The vetting that goes into assessing whether military age males are actually doing bad things is surprisingly high. I am not saying mistakes were not made. Civilians and kids have died for sure, but the majority of those killed were combatants. Implying otherwise makes me doubt the veracity of the other claims here. Nifty visualization though.
I hope so because otherwise that makes the US a monster.
> Civilians and kids have died for sure
It makes you wonder though, about cause and effect.
I mean, imagine if a foreign power had the capability to deploy drone strikes on US soil against people it saw as 'military combatants', and managed to kill them while they were attending weddings and the like, with some civilians and children regretfully caught in the crossfire.
I don't imagine it would take long for large numbers of military age males to be willing to become combatants against such an enemy.