Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I've noticed that Switzerland, using a lot of hydropower, has a worse intensity than I expected. The carbon intensity on the map seems to be for consumed kWh, not produced kWh. The map indicates Switzerland imports a lot of electricity from Austria and Germany which have a much higher carbon intensity.
Also CERN is currently offline for the winter which gets most of its power from France imports.
Live display of CO2 emitted to produce electricity in European countries
141–150 of 194 posts
Re: Live display of CO2 emitted to produce electricity in European countries
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
> it seems to highlight energy mix It's literally a visualisation of how green the country's energy policy is (electricity production sources), the color coding is gCO2/kWh. > rather than absolute numbers Absolute numbers would mostly just track population, that's way more misleading as a small country with sparse population but 100% hydrocarbon energy production would appear greener than a large country with dense p…
Your calculations are wrong: Population: 38.53 / 80.63 ~= 47,7% More coal sourced: 15.5 / 0.477 / 23.4 ~= 38.8% 38.8% vs 65% makes a difference
> 38.8% vs 65% makes a difference
No, it does not according to your number Poland still uses almost 40% more coal per capita than Germany, meaning it still looks bad if you switch to that metric.
Re: Live display of CO2 emitted to produce electricity in European countries
#143There seems to be lots of wind potential around the scottish isles and iceland. I wonder how feasible it would be to plaster turbines over iceland and then sell that energy to europe.
Similarly-isolated New Zealand does a similar thing, refining aluminium ore from Australia using abundant hydro power [2].
[1] http://www.landsvirkjun.com/researchdevelopment/research/sub...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiwai_Point_Aluminium_Smelter
Re: Live display of CO2 emitted to produce electricity in European countries
#144Does anyone know of interesting tours you can take of electricity production in Europe or energy infrastructure in general? I'm in The Netherlands, but would be willing to travel for it. A real tour of a nuclear plant would be awesome (i.e. getting to hear / see the reactor), but tours of wind farms / turbines / dams etc. would also be great. Preferably in English.
For pumped storage there is Dinorwig[1] (North Wales) and Cruachan (West Scotland). If you arrive by public transport you can get a free tour of the Cruachan pumped storage hydro plant.
[0]: https://www.edfenergy.com/energy/education/visitor-centres
[1]: http://www.electricmountain.co.uk/
[2]: http://www.visitcruachan.co.uk/
Edit:
There's a photo at the bottom of this blog post from my visit to Cruachan last summer: https://unop.uk/mobile-gb-rail-live-departure-boards
If you're in the French Alps then you could visit Grand'Maison on a bad weather day: http://www.musee-edf-hydrelec.com/
Re: Live display of CO2 emitted to produce electricity in European countries
#145Polish right-wing government is blocking any development that could hurt coal industry. They passed the law that significantly constrains where windmills can be located. They also hindered development of solar by reverting the law that allowed individual owners of solar panels to be paid for the overproduced electricity.
Polish government is not right-wing. There may be right wing of it, but it is not right wing per se. Right wing of what? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanation for a better clue about what current polish government may aspire to be like. It may have some right wing parts of what is above all big centrist coalition. Another issue is. How is this government blocking development that could hurt coal industry any dif…
Re: Live display of CO2 emitted to produce electricity in European countries
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
We have coal, so we use it, like other countries did before. Wind/solar farms don't work well here because of the weather and are expensive. Nuclear plants would require foreign technology which is very costly, and so far nuclear plants here are just a dream, a way to drain the public funds into the pockets of "nuclear plant construction" committee, which doesn't do anything useful (it doesn't help that the public op…
Don't be mad at me, but basically what are you saying is: "Screw you all, screw the planet, flood after us...". You should really not use argument: "you did it, so we will also do it", because when "we" did it, there was probably no other way. And now is. It's 2016, you can't burn coal in rate like it was 15th century. It won't help us transition to clean energy anyhow.
For solar power, Poland doesn't have good geographical position, similar with wind (it is only in the northern part, while the majority of population is in the south). And hydro is not that environment friendly, but we have those in the south, but it is hard to make more because there is a limit on the amount of water and Poland has less of it than e.g. Egypt.
The only other option is nuclear, but as others have written it is not popular in the public.
Re: Live display of CO2 emitted to produce electricity in European countries
#147Does anyone know of interesting tours you can take of electricity production in Europe or energy infrastructure in general? I'm in The Netherlands, but would be willing to travel for it. A real tour of a nuclear plant would be awesome (i.e. getting to hear / see the reactor), but tours of wind farms / turbines / dams etc. would also be great. Preferably in English.
Another Scotland recommendation- Ben Cruachan hydro dam has a nice visitor center. Its on the west coast. I work for Vandebron in the Netherlands. Some of our smaller producers are happy to show visitors around. It helps if you are one of the households they are supplying of course ;)
Re: Live display of CO2 emitted to produce electricity in European countries
#148Wow, what's wrong with Poland? I guess they use a lot of coal to produce electricity..?
Nothing is wrong with Poland. If something is wrong then your ability to read presented data. It doesn't mean we are emitting more CO2 - for all colored map lovers see[1] CO2 emission per capita for Germany or other European countries before jumping to conclusions. [1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CO2_per_capita_per_c...
The map's color-scale is not ideal. Germany and France look similar, but Germany's emissions are 500% higher than France. In contrast, Poland is just 35% worse than Germany, but looks like the Death star on the map. It would work better with a single one-color gradient, rather than a green-yellow-black.
Re: Live display of CO2 emitted to produce electricity in European countries
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not eating beef will not reduce your "carbon emmisions" (except for transport etc, which would presumably be substituted). They will reduce your "greenhouse gas emissions" though.
Methane is a carbon molecule
Incidentally, while searching for a reference to the assertion that CO2 is and methane is not included in a carbon footprint, I found the opposite:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_footprint
(Methane emmisions are expressed in terms of the equivalent CO2 effect and added with actual CO2, the unit is then written as CO2e.)
My original quibble is therefore much less important.
Re: Live display of CO2 emitted to produce electricity in European countries
#150I already knew that we had serious problems in our grid, caused by politics (overdimensioned gas, insistence on using coal due to pressure by miners, etc.). That's more or less widely known, but I had no idea it was SO messed up. And why the imports when we have most of the renewable sources sitting idle? Wow.