UW engineers achieve Wi-Fi at 10,000 times lower power
41–50 of 70 posts
Re: UW engineers achieve Wi-Fi at 10,000 times lower power
#42This seem another wifi achievement only replicable in a desert environment, during a solar maximum, on the dark side of the moon, while holding a black cat. If you are using a "wifi" antenna then that antenna is going to be picking up all sorts of little things. Normally these aren't much of an issue, but at these sensitivities suddenly that phone down the hall, the one not running at a 10e-3 power setting, is a real…
Re: UW engineers achieve Wi-Fi at 10,000 times lower power
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
You won't be downloading OS images very well, but it's still a lot. That's two HD videos simultaneously, with some to spare.
5Mbps is an interesting definition of HD...
So, based on that type of math, I expect to see only 4mbps actual throughput to a single client; less if shared by multiple clients. These radios are likely not MIMO, so the antenna will have to "context switch" between multiple clients, so expect bandwidth to be significantly less in multiple device scenarios.
All that being said, I think this is fascinating, and quite perfect for the hundreds of various environmental sensors that will inevitably end up in all of our houses to help us live more automated lives. All hail our new IoT sensor streaming, data driven, fully automated smart homes...
Re: UW engineers achieve Wi-Fi at 10,000 times lower power
#44This article is a few months old. The technology is now being commercialized by the same authors, as Jeeva Wireless: http://www.jeevawireless.com/
In case someone is wondering 'Jeeva' (pronounced as Jeev) means living thing in Hindi.
Re: UW engineers achieve Wi-Fi at 10,000 times lower power
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've looked at the paper [1], but I can't figure out how this is different from backscattered RFID with 802.11 on top. The paper says RFID requires a full-duplex radio while the WiFi chipset is orders of magnitude less expensive. Are they modulating differently or is there some RF magic? [1] http://passivewifi.cs.washington.edu/files/passive_wifi.pdf
The technology is ~50 years old, and was originally invented by the Soviets to eavesdrop on the US embassy in Moscow. https://youtu.be/mAai6dRAtFo?t=9m35s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device) TL;DR Using a passive antenna to modulate a directed microwave emission.
Re: UW engineers achieve Wi-Fi at 10,000 times lower power
#46I invented a coffee machine which works using 10000 times less power: it works by deferring the actual coffee making to another machine you plug into another wall socket.
Re: UW engineers achieve Wi-Fi at 10,000 times lower power
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
You won't be downloading OS images very well, but it's still a lot. That's two HD videos simultaneously, with some to spare.
I take it you've never used 802.11b. You were lucky to get a single YouTube video at 480p to load without downgrading, let alone two HD streams.
Re: UW engineers achieve Wi-Fi at 10,000 times lower power
#48I invented a coffee machine which works using 10000 times less power: it works by deferring the actual coffee making to another machine you plug into another wall socket.
Re: UW engineers achieve Wi-Fi at 10,000 times lower power
#49The low-power devices don't actually generate any signal at all thus don't have to pay that expensive power cost. Instead a passive antenna is modulated to reflect or absorb ambient signal, the reflected signal conforms to traditional 802.11 packets. The ambient signals are created by a relatively high-powered device that is plugged into wall power. Here is a 2 minute video showing an early prototype of their work fr…
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)
Re: UW engineers achieve Wi-Fi at 10,000 times lower power
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've looked at the paper [1], but I can't figure out how this is different from backscattered RFID with 802.11 on top. The paper says RFID requires a full-duplex radio while the WiFi chipset is orders of magnitude less expensive. Are they modulating differently or is there some RF magic? [1] http://passivewifi.cs.washington.edu/files/passive_wifi.pdf
Passive RFID is powered by the incoming radio waves that is 1000x stronger than the signal transmission energy from the RFID tag. There is no statement to the power requirement for passive WIFI from an active WIFI power source. The active WIFI transmitter may require outputting radio waves many times more powerful in order to receive a signal transmission from the passive wifi device. edit: For that reason, I'm not t…
Edit: After looking at the pater, it seems that I may have misunderstood the article, it needs a plugged RF carrier tone generator at at fixed frequency.