Honnest question for Safari users: why Safari? I don't really know Safari. I used Chrome on Windows and iOS, and when I moved to OSX I naturally continued with Chrome. And the dev tools are really great.
More power efficient which is key because I use a laptop all the time, and often on battery power. It fits better with macOS conventions compared to Chrome and Firefox. It's faster. Safari content blockers (I use 1Blocker) seems to not slow down page loading at all compared to conventional ad-blockers on both Safari and Chrome, which does. I used Chrome on Mac for years. Then Safari became better, and then it kept ge…
Safari Technology Preview supports 100% of the ES2015/16/17 features
81–90 of 126 posts
Re: Safari Technology Preview supports 100% of the ES2015/16/17 features
#82Honnest question for Safari users: why Safari? I don't really know Safari. I used Chrome on Windows and iOS, and when I moved to OSX I naturally continued with Chrome. And the dev tools are really great.
I use Chrome every day because all of my work stuff on my work laptop goes in Chrome, and all of my personal stuff goes in Safari, because that's what I like the best and use at home. Separate browsers mean separate session tokens for work vs personal gmail.
Re: Safari Technology Preview supports 100% of the ES2015/16/17 features
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
More power efficient which is key because I use a laptop all the time, and often on battery power. It fits better with macOS conventions compared to Chrome and Firefox. It's faster. Safari content blockers (I use 1Blocker) seems to not slow down page loading at all compared to conventional ad-blockers on both Safari and Chrome, which does. I used Chrome on Mac for years. Then Safari became better, and then it kept ge…
Is there any way to hook up bookmark syncing cross browser? Better battery life would be nice, but I like having Chrome's sync between Mac, Windows, Linux, and iOS.
Re: Safari Technology Preview supports 100% of the ES2015/16/17 features
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
The power efficiency isn't even close. The 2016 MBP battery lasts about 10 hours running Safari versus 3 hours running Chrome. I've never particularly liked Safari, but I'm close to switching myself because Chrome is such a disaster. From the energy impact tab on the Activity Monitor: Chrome: 43 Safari: 0.3
+1. I use Safari for everything work, personal stuff like banking and news. Chrome incognito for you know what.
Re: Safari Technology Preview supports 100% of the ES2015/16/17 features
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean the title is the whole context. If you're worried about the table not being static, one can ideally refer to an archive [0] (just saved it) or since this is an open source project that is version controlled, the specific revision [1] displayed. [0]: https://web.archive.org/web/20161208203812/http://kangax.git... [1]: https://github.com/kangax/compat-table/blob/559825d41e7b8773...
I wouldn't say that I'm "worried", but the title states a fact that will likely, at some point, not be supported by the given link.
Re: Safari Technology Preview supports 100% of the ES2015/16/17 features
#86Re: Safari Technology Preview supports 100% of the ES2015/16/17 features
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many reasons. Among those I care about: * It's a lot more power-efficient than any other browser. * In my experience, it's often faster than Chrome. * It follows platform conventions. I still get weirded out by Chrome cramming everything into that ⋮ button. * It syncs history, favorites, and open tabs over iCloud to Safari on my phone. It also supports Handoff. * It's not made by Google, a company that I prefer to gi…
An FYI regarding "In my experience, it's often faster than Chrome"... I found during development that Safari will start retrieving suggested URLs even before you finish typing them, so if I'm going to 'news.ycombinator.com', it makes the request when I hit 'n', and by the time I hit a few more characters and enter a few hundred milliseconds later, the request is already complete.
Re: Safari Technology Preview supports 100% of the ES2015/16/17 features
#88Honnest question for Safari users: why Safari? I don't really know Safari. I used Chrome on Windows and iOS, and when I moved to OSX I naturally continued with Chrome. And the dev tools are really great.
Re: Safari Technology Preview supports 100% of the ES2015/16/17 features
#89Honnest question for Safari users: why Safari? I don't really know Safari. I used Chrome on Windows and iOS, and when I moved to OSX I naturally continued with Chrome. And the dev tools are really great.
Many reasons. Among those I care about: * It's a lot more power-efficient than any other browser. * In my experience, it's often faster than Chrome. * It follows platform conventions. I still get weirded out by Chrome cramming everything into that ⋮ button. * It syncs history, favorites, and open tabs over iCloud to Safari on my phone. It also supports Handoff. * It's not made by Google, a company that I prefer to gi…
Chrome shows wrong, washed out or desaturated colors everywhere (not just embedded images without color profiles or wrong gamma, but css hex colors), it's a big difference from Safari, Firefox and specially from browsers on Windows machines and phones.
Re: Safari Technology Preview supports 100% of the ES2015/16/17 features
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
More power efficient which is key because I use a laptop all the time, and often on battery power. It fits better with macOS conventions compared to Chrome and Firefox. It's faster. Safari content blockers (I use 1Blocker) seems to not slow down page loading at all compared to conventional ad-blockers on both Safari and Chrome, which does. I used Chrome on Mac for years. Then Safari became better, and then it kept ge…
The power efficiency isn't even close. The 2016 MBP battery lasts about 10 hours running Safari versus 3 hours running Chrome. I've never particularly liked Safari, but I'm close to switching myself because Chrome is such a disaster. From the energy impact tab on the Activity Monitor: Chrome: 43 Safari: 0.3
Can you point to battery benchmarks or is this an off the cuff personal test?
Are you talking about an old version of Chrome? You're aware they've been making progress recently?
https://9to5mac.com/2016/09/06/google-chrome-mac-battery-per...