51–60 of 75 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Making a post without explicitly labeling it as sarcasm is always a risky maneuver but I prefer the nuance.
The best outcome is when sarcasm is not detected, yet the comment still gets upvoted.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And then they will also use that information to help other companies poach your employees, at best. At worst, the data will be purchased for some sales team to identify and target your company to sign some wildly overpriced long term sales contract. They will know employee behavior and who the key prospects are in your organization. It has happened before. Even I was shocked how tens of thousands of companies handed…
Just a pet peeve, but please re-consider the casual use of the word "poach" when referring to companies hiring employees. It reduces a worker's agency to that of a farm animal or wild game, as if they were owned by their employer and "stolen" away by some other employer. I think we can all agree that we are not the property of our employers, so the word "poach" is pretty inappropriate and I'd argue moderately offensi…
I was deliberately and enthusiastically nodding with the "we are not the property of our employers" bit. Then you dropped the O-word and now, mostly because I'm curious to the point of disaster, I think I actually kind of need to see one argue that 'poach' is carte-blanche "offensive".
I fail to understand how a group of smart, well paid executives all got in a room, wrote down these ideas, and no one said this was dumb.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And then they will also use that information to help other companies poach your employees, at best. At worst, the data will be purchased for some sales team to identify and target your company to sign some wildly overpriced long term sales contract. They will know employee behavior and who the key prospects are in your organization. It has happened before. Even I was shocked how tens of thousands of companies handed…
Just a pet peeve, but please re-consider the casual use of the word "poach" when referring to companies hiring employees. It reduces a worker's agency to that of a farm animal or wild game, as if they were owned by their employer and "stolen" away by some other employer. I think we can all agree that we are not the property of our employers, so the word "poach" is pretty inappropriate and I'd argue moderately offensi…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just a pet peeve, but please re-consider the casual use of the word "poach" when referring to companies hiring employees. It reduces a worker's agency to that of a farm animal or wild game, as if they were owned by their employer and "stolen" away by some other employer. I think we can all agree that we are not the property of our employers, so the word "poach" is pretty inappropriate and I'd argue moderately offensi…
If you Google this word, one of the definitions is “take or acquire in an unfair or clandestine way”.
/s
This doesn’t mean that I don’t integrate things, it’s just that I usually do so on my own terms. In my experience, 3rd parties are pretty bad at guessing exactly how I want two things to work together. I would rather see services remain open, with several options for tying them together, than have a monolith decide on exactly one way to do it that serves primarily their interests over mine.
* LinkedIn identity and network in Microsoft Outlook and the Office suite
* LinkedIn notifications within the Windows action center
* Enabling members drafting résumés in Word to update their profiles, and discover and apply to jobs on LinkedIn
* Extending the reach of Sponsored Content across Microsoft properties
* Enterprise LinkedIn Lookup powered by Active Directory and Office 365
* LinkedIn Learning available across the Office 365 and Windows ecosystem
* Developing a business news desk across our content ecosystem and MSN.com
Few of these features benefit the user.
Good reason to switch to LibreOffice, if you haven't already.
(My last Microsoft Office purchase was Word 97. LibreOffice is pretty good now, although the early years of SunOffice and OpenOffice were painful. I liked Windows 7, and I still have one machine running it, but everything else is Linux now.)